Weather conditions favouring cone initiation for Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Seed production in 25 trees of Siberian stone pine (age 180–200 years) over a 28-year period was examined to determine how the weather factors and their period influence strobilus initiation. Since floral induction in Siberian stone pine occurs in a short period of time only during three weeks at the end of summer, the dynamics of temperature and precipitation during the thirty-days interval, starting from 20 July, were analysed in the present work. The average monthly temperature in July and August, as well as the amount of precipitation in July and August had a weak influence on the number of the cone initiation. There was also a weak influence of weather parameters calculated for shorter time intervals by ten-day interval. Air temperature in the first and second ten-day intervals of July had a weak positive effect on cone initiation, but from the third ten-day interval of this month and throughout August, excessive heat began to negatively affect cone initiation. The only significant negative correlation was found for the temperature of the first ten-day interval of August. This indicates increased sensitivity of initiating cone primordia to air temperature and exactly in this time interval. The example of Siberian cedar pine shows that cool weather during the initiation of macrostrobils favours their abundance. Optimal conditions for cone initiation in Siberian pine are average daily temperatures not higher than +17.5 °C in the first ten-day interval of August. The results of the study expand the understanding of the mechanisms of climatic regulation of generative morphogenesis and are important not only for understanding the fundamental basis of the fruiting process, but also for yield forecasting and management.

About the authors

Aleksandr V. Popov

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: tomskceltic@gmail.com

Engineer of the 1st category Associate of the laboratory of dendroecology

Russian Federation, 10/3, Academichesky av., 634055, Tomsk

Svetlana N. Velisevich

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: s_n_velisevich@mail.ru

Senior Research Associate of the laboratory of dendroecology

Russian Federation, 10/3, Academichesky av., 634055, Tomsk

References

  1. Pearse I.S., Koenig W.D., Kelly D. Mechanisms of mast seeding: resources, weather, cues, and selection. New Phytologist, 2016, v. 212, pp. 546–562. doi: 10.1111/nph.14114
  2. Bogdziewicz M., Żywiec M., Espelta J.M., Fernández-Martínez M., Calama R., Ledwoń M., McIntire E., Crone E.E. Environmental veto synchronizes mast seeding in four contrasting tree species. American Naturalist, 2019, v. 194, no. 2, pp. 246–259. doi: 10.1086/704111
  3. Ashton P.S., Givnish T.J., Appanah S. Staggered flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: new insights into floral induction and the evolution of mast fruiting in the aseasonal tropics. American Naturalist, 1988, v. 132, no. 1, pp. 44–66. doi: 10.1086/284837
  4. Forcella F. Ovulate cone production in pinyon: negative exponential relationship with late summer temperature. Ecology, 1981, v. 62, pp. 488–491. doi: 10.2307/1936722
  5. Redmond M.D., Forcella F., Barger N.N. Declines in pinyon pine cone production associated with regional warming. Ecosphere, 2012, v. 3, no. 12, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1890/ES12-00306.1
  6. Bernier G. The control of floral evocation and morphogenesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1988, v. 39, pp. 175–219. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.39.060188.001135
  7. Kelly D., Geldenhuis A., James A., Holland E.P., Plank M.J. et al. Of mast and mean: differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change. Ecology Letters, 2013, v. 16, pp. 90–98. doi: 10.1111/ele.12020
  8. Shuvaev D.N., Semerikov V.L., Kuznetsova G.V. Late Quaternary history of Siberian stone pine as revealed by genetic and paleoecological data. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2023, v. 19, iss. 2, at. 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-023-01592-z
  9. Vander Wall, S.B. Seed Dispersal in Pines (Pinus). Bot. Rev, 2023 (In press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-023-09288-8.
  10. Titov E.V. Orexoproduktivnye kedrovye plantacii i lesosady [Nut producing stone pine plantations and forest plantations]. Voronezh: Publishing house of VSFUFT named after G.F. Morozov, 2021, 267 p.
  11. Goroshkevich S.N. Prostranstvenno-vremennaya i strukturno-funkcional’naya organizaciya krony kedra sibirskogo [Spatial-temporal and structural-functional organization of the crown of Siberian stone pine]. Dr. Sci. (Biol.) thesis. Tomsk, 2011, 611 p.
  12. Goroshkevich S., Velisevich S., Popov A., Khutornoy O., Vasilyeva G. 30-year cone production dynamics in Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica) in the southern boreal zone: a causal interpretation. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 2021, v. 154, no. 3, pp. 321–331. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.eu/issue/3728/
  13. Vorob’ev V.N., Vorob’eva N.A., Goroshkevich S.N. Rost i pol kedra sibirskogo [Growth and sexual reproduction of the Siberian stone pine]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1989, 167 p.
  14. Velisevich S.N. Shirotnaya izmenchivost’ kachestva urozhaya kedra sibirskogo [Latitudinal variability of Siberian stone pine crop quality]. Trinadtsatoe sibirskoe soveshchanie i shkola molodykh uchenykh po klimato-ekologicheskomu monitoringu: tezisy dokladov rossiyskoy konferentsii [Thirteenth Siberian Conference and School of Young Scientists on Climate and Ecological Monitoring. Theses of reports of the Russian conference], Tomsk 15–19 October 2019. Tomsk: Agraf-Press Publishing House, 2019, pp. 158–159.
  15. Wion A., Pearse I., Rodman K., Veblen T., Redmond M. Masting is shaped by tree-level attributes and stand structure, more than climate, in a Rocky Mountain conifer species. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, v. 531, at. 120794. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120794.
  16. Crone E.E., McIntire E.J.B., Brodie J. What defines mast seeding? Spatio-temporal patterns of cone production by whitebark pine. J. of Ecology, 2011, v. 99, pp. 438–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01790.x
  17. Farjon A. The Kew Review: Conifers of the World. Kew Bull, 2018, v. 73, is. 1, at. 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-018-9738-5.
  18. Goroshkevich S.N. Struktura i razvitie elementarnogo pobega kedra sibirskogo [The structure and development of Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) elementary shoot]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya, 2014; no. 4(28), pp. 37–55.
  19. Proietti S., Scariot V., De Pascale S., Paradiso R. Flowering Mechanisms and Environmental Stimuli for Flower Transition: Bases for Production Scheduling in Greenhouse Floriculture. Plants, 2022, v. 11, iss. 3, at. 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030432
  20. Dai X., Zhang Y., Xu X., Ran M., Zhang J. Transcriptome and functional analysis revealed the intervention of brassinosteroid in regulation of cold induced early flowering in tobacco. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, v. 14, at. 1136884. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1136884.
  21. Peer L.A., Bhat M.Y., Ahmad N., Mir B.A. Floral induction pathways: Decision making and determination in plants to flower – a comprehensive review. J. of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 2021, v. 9, pp. 7–17. doi: 10.7324/JABB.2021.9201
  22. Chaylakhyan M.X. Regulyatsiya tsveteniya vysshikh rasteniy [Regulation of higher plants flowering]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, 500 p.
  23. Owens J.N., Blake N.D. Forest tree seed production: a review of literature and recommendations for future research. Information Report P-I-X 53. Ontario: National Capital Region, 1985, 161 p.
  24. Colombo S., Templeton, C. Bud and crown architecture of white spruce and black spruce. Trees, 2006, v. 20, pp. 633–641. doi: 10.1007/s00468-006-0078-y
  25. Kozlowski T.T., Pallardy S.G. Growth Control in Woody Plants. San Diego: Academic Press Inc., 1997, 641 p.
  26. Cho L.H., Yoon J., An G. The control of flowering time by environmental factors. The Plant J., 2017, v. 90, iss. 4, pp. 708–719. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13461
  27. Ross S.D., Pharis R.P. Control of sex expression in conifers. Plant Growth Regulation, 1987, v. 6, pp. 37–60.
  28. Kong L., von Aderkas P., Zaharia, L.I. Effects of stem-injected gibberellins and 6-benzylaminopurine on phytohormone profiles and cone yield in two lodgepole pine genotypes. Trees, 2018, v. 32, pp. 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1670-7
  29. Webber J., Ott P., Owens J., Binder W. Elevated temperature during reproductive development affects cone traits and progeny performance in Picea glauca x engelmannii complex. Tree Physiology, 2005, v. 25, no. 10, pp. 1219–1227. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.10.1219
  30. Greenwood M.S., Hutchison K.W. Maturation as a Developmental Process. Clonal Forestry I. Berlin: Springer, 1993, pp. 14–33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-84175-0_3
  31. LaMontagne J.M., Redmond M.D., Wion A.P., Greene D.F. An assessment of temporal variability in mast seeding of North American Pinaceae. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 2021, v. 376, at. 20200373. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0373

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Popov A.V., Velisevich S.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 68118 от  21.12.2016.