Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskayaIzvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya2587-5566The Russian Academy of Sciences1585610.31857/S2587-55662019446-62Research ArticleSettlement network topology as a factor of rural population dynamics (a case study of Tyumen oblast)SheludkovA. V.a.v.sheludkov@igras.ruOrlovM. A.a.v.sheludkov@igras.ruInstitute of Geography, Russian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences28082019446622808201928082019Copyright © 2019, Russian academy of sciences2019<p>After a brief counter-urbanization of the early 1990s, rural out-migration resumed in Russia. Population concentrates in large settlements, while small and medium-sized towns and villages lose people. The farther rural settlements from regional center the greater the outflow of people. Centripetal tendencies can be mitigated or amplified at local level, where specific conditions of the area come to fore. The authors suggest settlement network pattern as one of such contextual factors, whose effects on population dynamics are still poorly understood. The paper poses two questions: what the effects of settlement network topology on the rate of population concentration are, and how population dynamics in individual settlements depends on their position in settlement network. Based on a case study of Tyumen oblast of Russia the authors investigated population dynamics in 20022010 with methods of network, cluster and regression analysis. The authors did not find relationship between density and centralization of settlement network and rate of population concentration. However, the study revealed a significant role, played by the network position in determining individual settlements population increase/decrease. Together with initial population size, the network position explained 2324% of the variance in population dynamics among the towns and villages of Tyumen oblast. Outside the Tyumen metropolitan area settlements with highest inter-district network centrality grew. It is noteworthy that configuration of the regional settlement network at inter-district level emerged during the period of colonization of Western Siberia in 1719 centuries. The configuration largely stems from the river network. Thus, even if the factors, which determined settlement network pattern, have lost their force, the settlement pattern itself continues to affect social space.</p>rural depopulationpopulation concentrationsettlement patternsettlement networknetwork analysiscluster analysisWestern Siberiaдепопуляция сельских территорийсжатие расселениярисунок расселениясетевой анализкластерный анализЗападная Сибирь[Averkieva K.V. Innovation in agriculture of the Non-Black Soil Zone of Russia as a response to the contraction of space. Reg. Res. Russ., 2013, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52-61.][Glezer O.B. Local self-government system as a component of the institutional background of settlement pattern in modern Russia. In Voprosy geografii. Sb. 135: Geografiya naseleniya i sotsialnaya geografiya. [Problems of Geography. Vol. 135: Population Geography and Social Geography]. Moscow: Kodeks Publ., 2013, pp. 224-244. (In Russ.).][Glezer O.B. The main features of structure and dynamics of settlement pattern in large economic region: case study of the North Caucases. Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow: Inst. Geogr. Acad. Sci., 1987. 222 p.][Gol’ts G.A. Transport i rasselenie [Transport and Settlement Pattern]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1981. 248 p.][Gorkin A.P., Smirnyagin L.V. On the factors and conditions for the placement of capitalist industry. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 1973, no. 1, pp. 68-75. (In Russ.).][Gunko M.S., Glezer O.B. Small district centers and the surrounding areas in Central Russia (1970-2010): dynamics and distribution of population. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2015, no. 1, pp. 64-76. (In Russ.).][Zubarevich N.V. Transformation of the rural settlement pattern and social services network in rural areas. Reg. Res. Russ., 2013, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 221-233.][Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V The role of migration in enhancing settlement pattern contrasts at the municipal level in Russia. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2016, no. 5, pp. 46-59. (In Russ.).][Kovalev S.A. Types of settlements–rayon centres in the USSR. In Voprosy geografii. Sb. 56: Geografiya naseleniya SSSR [Problems of Geography. Vol. 17: the USSR Population Geography]. Moscow, 1962, pp. 54-72. (In Russ.).][Mkrtchyan N.V. Migration of young people to regional centers of Russia at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries. Reg. Res. Russ., 2013, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 335-347. (In Russ.).][Nefedova T.G., Mkrtchan N.V. Migration of rural population and dynamics of agricultural employment in the regions of Russia. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2017, no. 5, pp. 58-67. (In Russ.).][Nefedova T.G. Compression and polarization of social space in Russia. Demoskop Weekly, 2012, no. 507-508. (In Russ.).][Polyan P.M. Territorial’nye struktury – urbanizatsiya – rasselenie: teoreticheskie podkhody i metody izucheniya [Territorial Structures – Urbanization – Settlement: Theoretical Approaches and Research Methods]. Moscow: Novii Khronograf Publ., 2014. 788 p.][Tarkhov S.A. Transport accessibility. In Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: ponyatiya i terminy. Slovar’-spravochnik [Socio-Economic Geography: Concepts and Terms. Handbook]. Gorkin A.P., Ed. Smolensk: Oikumena Publ., 2013, pp. 267-268. (In Russ.).][Tkachenko A.A., Fomkina A.A., Shavrin V.N. Settlement systems of municipal districts of Central Russia. In Voprosy geografii. Sb. 135: Geografiya naseleniya i sotsialnaya geografiya [Problems of Geography. Vol. 135: Population Geography and Social Geography]. Moscow: Kodeks Publ., 2013, pp. 270-288. (In Russ.).][Treivish A.I. “Compression” of space: models and interpretations. In Szhatie sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: novoe v teorii regional’nogo razvitiya i praktike ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya [Compression of Socio-economic Space: New in the Theory of Regional Development and the Practice of its State Regulation]. Sintserov L.M., Ed. Moscow: Eslan Publ., 2010, pp. 16-31. (In Russ.).][Fomkina A.A. Trans-district centers of social infrastructure: a new approach to their identification (case study of the Tver oblast). Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2016, no 6, pp. 57-64. (In Russ.).][Sheludkov A.V., Rasskazov S.V., Farakhutdinov Sh.F. Sel’skie munitsipalitety yuga Tyumenskoi oblasti: prostranstvo, statistika, vlast’ [Rural Municipalities of the South of the Tyumen Region: Space, Statistics, Governance]. Moscow: Strana Oz Publ., 2016. 184 p.][Alekseev A.I., Safronov S.G. Transformation trends of Russia’s rural settlement patterns in the late soviet and post-soviet periods (1970-2010). Reg. Res. Russ., 2015, no. 2 (5), pp. 193-201.][Bates D., et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw., 2015, no. 1 (67), pp. 1-48.][Charrad M., et al. Package ‘nbclust’. J. Stat. Softw., 2014, no. 61, pp. 1-36.][Csárdi G., Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Syst., 2006, no. 1695 (5), pp. 1-9.][Fielding A.J. Migration and urbanization in Western Europe since 1950. The Geogr. J., 1989, no. 1(155), pp. 60-69.][Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1978, no. 3 (1), pp. 215-239.][Hanneman R.A., Riddle M. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, 2005. URL: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/ (accessed: 24.02.2019).][Jaždžewska I. The historical diversity of Poland’s urban network. Cluster Analysis vs. Historical Regions. Geogr. Pol., 2013, no. 86 (3), pp. 219-236.][Kansky K.J. Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships Between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics. Chicago, 1963. 155 p.][Karachurina L., Mkrtchyan N. Age-specific net migration patterns in the municipal formations of Russia. GeoJournal, 2018, no. 1 (83), pp. 119-136.][Lu B. shp2graph: Convert a SpatialLinesDataFrame Object to an ’igraph’-Class Object. 2018. R package version 0-4. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shp2graph (accessed: 24.02.2019).][Meyfroidt P. Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science. J. Land Use Sci., 2016, no. 5 (11), pp. 501-522.][NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems, U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model. Ver. 2. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2011.][Naumann M., Reichert-Schick A. Infrastructure and peripheralization: empirical evidence from North-Eastern Germany. In Peripheralization, Fischer-Tahir A., Naumann M., Eds. Springer, 2013, pp. 145-167.][Nefedova T., Treivish A. Differential urbanisation in Russia. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2003, no. 1 (94), pp. 75-88.][Peregrine P. A graph-theoretic approach to the evolution of Cahokia. Am. Antiq., 1991, no. 1 (56), pp. 66-75.][Pitts F.R. A graph theoretic approach to historical geography. Prof. Geogr., 1965, no. 17(5), pp. 15-20.][Rivers R., Knappett C., Evans T. What makes a site important? Centrality, gateways, and gravity. In Network Analysis in Archaeology. Knappett C., Ed. Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 125-150.][Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009. 213 p.]