<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Физическая и реабилитационная медицина, медицинская реабилитация</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2658-6843</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2949-1436</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">689262</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36425/rehab689262</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">WRCSQN</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REVIEWS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>НАУЧНЫЙ ОБЗОР</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Modern technologies for post-stroke shoulder joint rehabilitation: combining evidence-based methods and promising technologies: a review</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Современные технологии реабилитации плечевого сустава после инсульта: сочетание доказательных методов и перспективных технологий (обзор литературы)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9161-5235</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9425-5854</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Savchits</surname><given-names>Daria O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Савчиц</surname><given-names>Дарья Олеговна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>dar.shabalina@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-2586</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1279-7072</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Prokopenko</surname><given-names>Semen V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Прокопенко</surname><given-names>Семен Владимирович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, профессор</p></bio><email>s.v.proc.58@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9916-6235</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1541-8273</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Subocheva</surname><given-names>Svetlana A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Субочева</surname><given-names>Светлана Алексеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, доцент</p></bio><email>Sveta162007@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Красноярский государственный медицинский университет имени профессора В.Ф. Войно-Ясенецкого</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-10-06" publication-format="electronic"><day>06</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-10-23" publication-format="electronic"><day>23</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>220</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-08-14"><day>14</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-09-22"><day>22</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/2658-6843/article/view/689262">https://journals.eco-vector.com/2658-6843/article/view/689262</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Shoulder joint dysfunction after stroke, observed in 12%–64% of patients, leads to pain, the development of contractures and subluxation, significantly reducing patients’ quality of life and complicating their rehabilitation. To confirm that rehabilitation of shoulder joint dysfunction after stroke is a complex but achievable task, an analysis of 38 scientific articles published between 2014 and 2025 was conducted. A search of articles was performed using keywords in open-access databases including <italic>PubMed, Cochrane, eLIBRARY.RU</italic>, and <italic>Scopus</italic>. All materials relevant to the research topic and published in Russian and English were included in this review. This review presents a brief overview of shoulder joint anatomy and current evidence-based methods for restoring shoulder function impaired as a result of cerebrovascular disorders. Both traditional (orthoses, taping, braces, botulinum toxin therapy) and innovative (functional electrical stimulation, robotic therapy, virtual reality, computer vision, and artificial intelligence) technologies were analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the importance of early initiation of rehabilitation, focusing on scapulohumeral stabilization; a personalized comprehensive approach based on the degree of paresis, spasticity, and stroke stage; integration of high-tech solutions into clinical practice; and combining different rehabilitation methods, which is more effective than monotherapy. The results demonstrate that modern comprehensive rehabilitation strategies create new prospects for upper limb function recovery whereas highlighting the need to adapt novel tools for real-world clinical practice to improve the quality of life in patients after stroke.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Нарушение функции плечевого сустава после инсульта, наблюдаемое у 12–64% пациентов, приводит к болевому синдрому, развитию контрактур и подвывиха, что значительно снижает качество жизни пациентов и затрудняет их реабилитацию. С целью подтверждения того, что реабилитация плечевого сустава после инсульта является сложной, но решаемой задачей, выполнен анализ 38 научных статей по данной тематике, опубликованных в период 2014–2025 годов. Поиск статей проводился с использованием ключевых слов из открытых баз данных PubMed, Cochrane, eLibrary, Scopus. Для обзора были отобраны все материалы, соответствующие теме исследования, опубликованные на русском и английском языках.</p> <p>В данном обзоре представлена краткая анатомия плечевого сустава и даны современные, основанные на принципах доказательной медицины методы восстановления функций плеча, пострадавших в результате критического нарушения мозгового кровообращения. Проанализированы как традиционные (ортезирование, тейпирование, использование бандажей, ботулинотерапия), так и инновационные (функциональная электростимуляция, роботизированная терапия, виртуальная реальность, компьютерное зрение и искусственный интеллект) технологии. Подчёркивается важность раннего начала восстановительного лечения с акцентом на стабилизацию плечелопаточного комплекса; персонализированного комплексного подхода на основе степени пареза, спастичности и стадии инсульта; внедрения высокотехнологичных решений в клиническую практику, а также комбинирования различных методов реабилитации, что даёт бóльшую эффективность, чем монотерапия.</p> <p>Полученные результаты демонстрируют, что современные комплексные реабилитационные стратегии создают новые перспективы для восстановления функции верхней конечности, требуя при этом адаптации новых инструментов к реальной клинической практике для улучшения качества жизни пациентов после инсульта.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>rehabilitation</kwd><kwd>shoulder joint</kwd><kwd>post-stroke complications</kwd><kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd><kwd>computer vision</kwd><kwd>review</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>реабилитация</kwd><kwd>плечевой сустав</kwd><kwd>постинсультные осложнения</kwd><kwd>искусственный интеллект</kwd><kwd>компьютерное зрение</kwd><kwd>обзор</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Li Y, Yang S, Cui L, et al. Prevalence, risk factor and outcome in middle-aged and elderly population affected by hemiplegic shoulder pain: an observational study. Front Neurol. 2023;13:1041263. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1041263 EDN: GZZBHE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Hao N, Zhang M, Li Y, Guo Y. Risk factors for shoulder pain after stroke: a clinical study. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(1):145–149. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.1.4594 EDN: IYKLQA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Kim MG, Lee SA, Park EJ, et al. Elastic dynamic sling on subluxation of hemiplegic shoulder in patients with subacute stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):9975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169975 EDN: MNRSSC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Matozinho CV, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Samora GA, et al. Incidence and potential predictors of early onset of upper-limb contractures after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(5):678–684. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1637949</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Jacinto J, Camхes-Barbosa A, Carda S, et al. A practical guide to botulinum neurotoxin treatment of shoulder spasticity 1: anatomy, physiology, and goal setting. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1004629. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1004629 EDN: EGFAYV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Yang S, Kim TU, Kim DH, Chang MC. Understanding the physical examination of the shoulder: a narrative review. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(2):2293–2303. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1808 EDN: ZGCGGM</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Kim J, Lee J, Lee BH. Effect of scapular stabilization exercise during standing on upper limb function and gait ability of stroke patients. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017;8(4):540–544. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_464_16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Gao Z, Lv S, Ran X, et al. Influencing factors of corticomuscular coherence in stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024;18:1354332. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1354332 EDN: RSSSGT</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Nadler M, Pauls M. Shoulder orthoses for the prevention and reduction of hemiplegic shoulder pain and subluxation: systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(4):444–453. doi: 10.1177/0269215516648753</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Morone G, Princi AA, Iosa M, et al. Effects of shoulder brace usage on postural stability in stroke survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabil. 2024;54(3):449–456. doi: 10.3233/NRE-230250 EDN: MEHBWI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Zorowitz RD, Idank D, Ikai T, et al. Shoulder subluxation after stroke: a comparison of four supports. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(8):763–771. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80532-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Ada L, Foongchomcheay A, Canning C. Supportive devices for preventing and treating subluxation of the shoulder after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2005(1):CD003863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003863.pub2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ravichandran H, Janakiraman B, Sundaram S, et al. Systematic review on effectiveness of shoulder taping in hemiplegia. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(6):1463–1473. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Wang Y, Li X, Sun C, Xu R. Effectiveness of kinesiology taping on the functions of upper limbs in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized trial. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(7):4145–4156. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06010-1 EDN: YCTCSS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Kristensen MG, Busk H, Wienecke T. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves activities of daily living post stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021;4(1):100167. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100167 EDN: ZTLZYQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Khan MA, Fares H, Ghayvat H, et al. A systematic review on functional electrical stimulation based rehabilitation systems for upper limb post-stroke recovery. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1272992. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1272992 EDN: APCFRR</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Vafadar AK, Côté JN, Archambault PS. Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation in improving clinical outcomes in the upper arm following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:729768. doi: 10.1155/2015/729768</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Chih-Lin K, Gwo-Chi H. Post-stroke spasticity: a review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatments. Int J Gerontology. 2018;12(4):280–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijge.2018.05.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Shaw LC, Price CI, van Wijck FM, et al. Botulinum toxin for the upper limb after stroke (BoTULS) trial: effect on impairment, activity limitation, and pain. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1371–1379. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.582197</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Xie HM, Guo TT, Sun X, et al. Effectiveness of botulinum toxin a in treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(9):1775–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.010 EDN: CAZEFG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Ke M, Li D, Zhou P. Efficacy of botulinum toxin combined with rehabilitation treatments in the treatment of post-stroke spasticity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. NeuroRehabil. 2024;55(4):399–416. doi: 10.1177/10538135241290110 EDN: EMAYDY</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Lee HS, Kim DH, Seo HG, et al. Efficacy of personalized rTMS to enhance upper limb function in subacute stroke patients: a protocol for a multi-center, randomized controlled study. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1427142. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1427142 EDN: RKYLQK</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Chen YJ, Huang YZ, Chen CY, et al. Intermittent theta burst stimulation enhances upper limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1302-x EDN: IXLNCB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Aprile I, Germanotta M, Cruciani A, et al. Upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):3–14. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000295 EDN: VAZROU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Gnasso R, Palermi S, Picone A, et al. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation for post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic review. Sensors. 2023;23(19):8239. doi: 10.3390/s23198239 EDN: DPSVYC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Bertani R, Melegari C, de Cola MC, et al. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(9):1561–1569. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5 EDN: BHCIWA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Park JM, Park HJ, Yoon SY, et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Stroke. 2025;56(5):1243–1252. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048183 EDN: HKAMAV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Akgün İ, Demirbüken İ, Timurtaş E, et al. Exoskeleton-assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurol Res. 2024;46(11):1074–1082. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2024.2381385</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Park JH, Park G, Kim HY, et al. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00763-6 EDN: LDDBXU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Nicora G, Pe S, Santangelo G, et al. Systematic review of AI/ML applications in multi-domain robotic rehabilitation: trends, gaps, and future directions. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01605-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Mani Bharat V, Manimegalai P, George ST. A systematic review of techniques and clinical evidence to adopt virtual reality in post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation. Virtual Reality. 2024;28(4):172. doi: 10.1007/s10055-024-01065-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Maqsood U, Naz S, Nazir Sh. The effect of virtual reality on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with stroke. J Health Rehabil Res. 2023;1(1):29–33. doi: 10.61919/jhrr.v3i1.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Bok SK, Song Y, Lim A, et al. High-tech home-based rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(7):2668. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072668 EDN: URNFCI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Tong Q, Wei W, Zhang Y, et al. Survey on hand-based haptic interaction for virtual reality. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2023;16(2):154–170. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2023.3266199 EDN: DAFRUG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Zhu Y, Wang C, Li J, et al. Effect of different modalities of artificial intelligence rehabilitation techniques on patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1125172. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1125172 EDN: BREAIO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Oubre B, Daneault JF, Jung HT, et al. Estimating upper-limb impairment level in stroke survivors using wearable inertial sensors and a minimally-burdensome motor task. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28(3):601–611. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2966950 EDN: EEURFZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Senadheera I, Hettiarachchi P, Haslam B, et al. AI applications in adult stroke recovery and rehabilitation: a scoping review using AI. Sensors. 2024;24(20):6585. doi: 10.3390/s24206585 EDN: KZILGN</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
