Reducing integral structural risks of network structures on the example of forestry industry
- Authors: Bezdenezhnyh V.M.1, Sinyavskiy N.G.2
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- The Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 7, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 603-614
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2658-7548/article/view/699364
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.7.3.120688
- ID: 699364
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The relevance of the issues discussed in the article is due to the fact that in practice corporate structures are often formed without taking into account risk assessment. The article emphasizes the expediency of structuring production processes taking into account the risk structure by introducing the concept of structural integral risk.
To assess structural integral risks, the tools of graph theory and probability theory are used. The integral risk assessment is carried out on the example of a typical structure of a wood firm.
The assessment of integral structural risks is carried out under the assumption of sufficiency of quality work, at least one technological chain connecting the initial and final stages of production.
It is shown that if the structure is formed without taking into account the risks, the initial structural risk, i.e. the risk of poor quality operation of the company without additional measures, may be too large.
For the considered example, measures to reduce the initial structural integral risk are proposed. These measures consist both in influencing individual elementary risks and their totality and in improving the risk structure.
To assess structural integral risks, the tools of graph theory and probability theory are used. The integral risk assessment is carried out on the example of a typical structure of a wood firm.
The assessment of integral structural risks is carried out under the assumption of sufficiency of quality work, at least one technological chain connecting the initial and final stages of production.
It is shown that if the structure is formed without taking into account the risks, the initial structural risk, i.e. the risk of poor quality operation of the company without additional measures, may be too large.
For the considered example, measures to reduce the initial structural integral risk are proposed. These measures consist both in influencing individual elementary risks and their totality and in improving the risk structure.
About the authors
Vyacheslav Mikhaylovich Bezdenezhnyh
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Email: savrula@gmail.com
Nikolay Grigoryevich Sinyavskiy
The Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Email: synyavsky@list.ru
References
1. Авдийский В.И., Безденежных В.М. Риски хозяйствующих субъектов: теоретические основы, методология анализа, прогнозирования и управления. / Учебное пособие. - М.: Альфа-М. ИНФРА-М, 2013. – 368 c. 2. Авдийский В.И., Безденежных В.М. Прогнозирование и управление рисками организации. - М.: Кнорус, 2017. – 256 c. 3. Безденежных В.М., Синявский Н.Г. Проектирование систем управления рисками. / Учебник. - М.: Инфра-М, 2017. – 204 c. 4. Бернар И.В., Колли Ж.К. Толковый экономический и финансовый словарь. - М.: Международные отношения, 1997. – 759 c. 5. Горелова Г.В. Когнитивный подход к имитационному моделированию сложных систем // Известия ЮФУ. Технические науки. – 2013. – № 3(140). – c. 239-250. 6. ГОСТ Р 58771—2019 Менеджмент риска. Технология оценки рисков. (IEC 31010:2019, NEQ) 7. Найт Ф. Понятие риска и неопределенности // Thesis. – 1994. – № 5. – c. 12-28. 8. Верещагин В.В., Белоусов С.А. Развитие риск-менеджмента в России (обзор применяемых практик, ситуаций и актуальных проблем за период 2006-2015 гг.). / Сборник статей. - М.: ИНФРА-М, 2016. – 216 c. 9. Синявский Н.Г. Оценка бизнеса: гипотезы. Инструментарий, практические решения в различных областях деятельности. - М.: Финансы и статистика, 2005. – 240 c. 10. Синявский Н.Г. О системе показателей для генерирования направлений развития бизнеса на водном транспорте // Речной транспорт (XXI век). – 2012. – № 5(59). – c. 63-69. 11. Синявский Н.Г., Дадалко А.В. Когнитивная модель генерирования инноваций в ЛПК // Экономика образования. – 2014. – № 4. – c. 159-164. 12. Городецкий А.Е., Караваева И.В., Лев М.Ю., Бухвальд Е.М., Казанцев С.В., Коломиец А.Г., Колпакова И.А., Иванов Е.А., Быковская Ю.В., Сазонова Е.С. Экономическая безопасность России в новой реальности. - Москва: Институт экономики Российской академии наук, 2021. – 325 c. 13. Городецкий И.В., Караваева И.В. Экономическая безопасность России: теоретическое обоснование и методы регулирования. / Монография. - М.: Институт экономики РАН, 2023. – 361 c. 14. Эскиндаров М.А. Развитие корпоративных отношений в современной российской экономике. / Монография. - М.: Республика, 1999. – 368 c.
Supplementary files
