China: society and cultureChina: society and cultureКитай: общество и культура2782-36522949-1398Eco-Vector10829010.17816/Ch108290ArticlesСтатьи文章Review ArticleA Review of the Book «The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han» by Mark E. LewisРецензия на книгу Марка Льюиса (M.E. Lewis) «The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han»Mark Lewis的书评 (M.E.Lewis） “The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han“https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2785-12818749-6692BashkeevVictor V.БашкеевВиктор ВикторовичBashkeevVictor V.
Russian Federation
martartofaw@gmail.comInstitute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of SciencesИнститут Дальнего Востока Российской академии наукInstitute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences2705202210062022111231302705202227052022Copyright ©; 2022, Bashkeev V.V.Copyright ©; 2022, Башкеев В.В.Copyright ©; 2022, Bashkeev V.2022Bashkeev V.V.Башкеев В.В.Bashkeev V.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://journals.eco-vector.com/China_SC/article/view/108290

The review of the book (Lewis M.E. The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007) sums up the contents of the book and reviews its value for the world Han studies as well as those methods and research traditions of Western sinology in Ancient China studies which lay in the very base of the book creation. After paying respect to the advantages of the book, the author of this review discusses the effectiveness of methods used in the book for studying Chinese Ancient history.

В рецензии на книгу одного из ведущих американских ученых специалистов по китайской древности (Lewis M.E. The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007) рассматривается научная ценность работы для мирового ханеведения и те научные и методологические традиции, которые лежат в ее основе. Проанализировав содержание книги и отдав должное ее сильным сторонам, рецензент на примере данной книги выступает с критикой некоторых аспектов методологии западной синологической исторической науки в изучении Древнего Китая (М.Э. Льюис является ярким ее представителем, выступая одним из фронтменов американской «классической» синологии) и ставит вопрос о продуктивности ее использования для получения знаний о китайской древности.

美国著名的中国古代学者（Lewis M.E.The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han.Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007) 研究工作对世界范围内的科学价值及其背后的科学和方法传统。在分析了本书的内容并赞扬了其优点后，评论家对西方汉学史学研究中国古代方法论的某些方面进行了批评（M.E. Lewis是其中的突出代表，作为美国“古典”汉学的先驱之一）并提出了一个问题，其有效性是用来获取中国古代知识的。

Ancient ChinaQinWestern HanEastern Hanhistorical geographypolitical historyculturesource studiesHan shuShi JiДревний Китайгосударство ЦиньЗападная ХаньВосточная Ханьисторическая географияполитическая историякультураисточниковедениеХань шуШи цзи古代中国秦国西汉东汉历史地理政治史文化来源研究汉书史记Lewis ME. The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2007.Lewis M.E. The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.Lewis ME. Imperii Drevnego Kitaya [The Early Chinese Empires Qin and Han]. Belousov S, trans. Moscow, 2016. (In Russ).Льюис М.Э. Империи Древнего Китая. От Цинь к Хань: великая смена династий / пер. с англ. С.А. Белоусова. М., 2016.Istoria Kitaya: Uchebnik [History of China: Textbook]. Meliksetov AV, editor. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 2002. (In Russ).История Китая: Учебник / ред. А.В. Меликсетов. М.: Высшая школа, 2002.Hulsewé AFP. Remnants of Han Law. Leiden: Brill; 1955;1.Hulsewé A.F.P. Remnants of Han Law, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill, 1955.Hulsewé AFP. Remnants of Ch’in Law: An Annotated Translation of the Ch’in Legal and Administrative Rules of the 3rd Century B.C. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Hulsewé A.F.P. Remnants of Ch’in Law: An Annotated Translation of the Ch’in Legal and Administrative Rules of the 3rd Century B.C. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Cambridge History of China. The Ch’in and Han Empires. 221 BC. — A.D. 220. Loewe M, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986;1.Cambridge History of China. Vol. 1: The Ch’in and Han Empires. 221 BC. — A.D. 220. M. Loewe, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Dubs H, trans., comment. The History of the Former Han Dynasty by Pan Ku. The Imperial Annals (Chapters I–V). Baltimore: Waverly Press; 1938;1.Dubs H., trans., comment. The History of the Former Han Dynasty by Pan Ku. Vol. 1. The Imperial Annals (Chapters I–V). Baltimore: Waverly Press, 1938.Dubs H, trans., comment. The History of the Former Han Dynasty by Pan Ku. The Imperial Annals (Chapters VI–X). Baltimore: Waverly Press; 1944;2.Dubs H., trans., comment. The History of the Former Han Dynasty by Pan Ku. Vol. 2. The Imperial Annals (Chapters VI–X). Baltimore: Waverly Press, 1944.Dubs H, trans., comment. The History of the Former Han Dynasty by Pan Ku. The Imperial Annals (Chapters XI–XII and the Memoirs of Wang Mang). Baltimore: Waverly Press; 1955(3).Dubs H., trans., comment. The History of the Former Han Dynasty by Pan Ku. Vol. 3. The Imperial Annals (Chapters XI–XII and the Memoirs of Wang Mang). Baltimore: Waverly Press, 1955.Watson B. Records of The Grand Historian of China. New York: Columbia University Press; 1961.Watson B. Records of The Grand Historian of China. New York: Columbia University Press, 1961.Watson B. Records of the Grand Historian: Han Dynasty I & II; Qin dynasty. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.Watson B. Records of the Grand Historian: Han Dynasty I & II; Qin dynasty. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Sima Qian. Shiji [Records of the Grand Historian] Beijing; 1959. (In Chinese)司馬談. 史記. 北京: 中華書局, 1959. [Сыма Цянь. Шицзи (Исторические записки). Пекин: Чжунхуа, 1959.]Ban Gu. Han shu [History of Han]. Beijing; 1962. (In Chinese)班固. 漢書. 北京: 中華書局, 1962. [Бань Гу. Ханьшу (История Хань). Пекин: Чжунхуа, 1962.]Kern M. The Stele Inscriptions of Ch’in Shih-huang: Text and Ritual in Early Chinese Imperial Representation. New Haven (CT): American Oriental Society; 2000.Kern M. The Stele Inscriptions of Ch’in Shih-huang: Text and Ritual in Early Chinese Imperial Representation. New Haven (CT): American Oriental Society, 2000.Kern M. Religious Anxiety and Political Interest in Western Han Omen Interpretation: The Case of the Han Wudi Period (141–87 B.C.). Studies in Chinese History. 2000;(10):1–31.Kern M. Religious Anxiety and Political Interest in Western Han Omen Interpretation: The Case of the Han Wudi Period (141–87 B.C.) // Studies in Chinese History. 2000. No. 10. P. 1–31.Kern M. “Feature: Writing and Authority in Early China” by Mark Edward Lewis. China Review International. 2000;7(2):336–376.Kern M. “Feature: Writing and Authority in Early China” by Mark Edward Lewis // China Review International. 2000. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 336–376.Lewis ME. The Feng and Shan Sacrifices of Emperor Wu of the Han. In: McDermott J, editor. State and Court Ritual in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Lewis M.E. The Feng and Shan Sacrifices of Emperor Wu of the Han. In: McDermott J., ed. State and Court Ritual in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Durrant SW. Ssu’ma Ch’ien’s Portrayal of the First Ch’in Emperor. In: Imperial Rulership and Cultural Change in Traditional China. Brandauer FP, Chun-Chieh Huang, eds. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 1994.Durrant S.W. Ssu’ma Ch’ien’s Portrayal of the First Ch’in Emperor. In: Imperial Rulership and Cultural Change in Traditional China. Brandauer F.P., Chun-Chieh Huang, eds. Seattle: University of Washington Press,1994.Durrant SW. The Cloudy Mirror: Tension and Conflict in the Writings of Sima Qian. Albany: SUNY Press; 1995.Durrant S.W. The Cloudy Mirror: Tension and Conflict in the Writings of Sima Qian. Albany: SUNY Press, 1995.Nylan M. The Chin-wen/Ku-wen Controversy in Han Times. T’oung Pao. 1994;80(1):82–144.Nylan M. The Chin-wen/Ku-wen Controversy in Han Times // T’oung Pao. 1994. Vol. 80. No 1. P. 82–144.Nylan M. Confucian Piety and Individualism in Han China. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 1996;116(1):1–27.Nylan M. Confucian Piety and Individualism in Han China // Journal of the American Oriental Society. 1996. Vol. 116. No. 1. P. 1–27.Nylan M. Han Classicists Writing in Dialogue about their Own Tradition. Philosophy East and West. 1997;47(2):133–188.Nylan M. Han Classicists Writing in Dialogue about their Own Tradition // Philosophy East and West. 1997. Vol. 47. No. 2. P. 133–188.Nylan M. A Problematic Model: The Han ‘Orthodox Synthesis’ Then and Now. In: Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Hermeneutics. Chow Kai-wing, Ng On-cho, J.B. Henderson, eds. Albany: SUNY Press; 1999.Nylan M. A Problematic Model: The Han ‘Orthodox Synthesis’ Then and Now. In: Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Hermeneutics. Chow Kai-wing, Ng On-cho, Henderson J.B., eds. Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.Shaughnessy EL. Military Histories of Early China: A Review Article. Early China. 1996;21:159–182.Shaughnessy E.L. Military Histories of Early China: A Review Article // Early China. 1996. Vol. 21. P. 159–182.Chang Kwang-chih. The Archaeology of Ancient China. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 1986. 450 p.Chang Kwang-chih. The Archaeology of Ancient China. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press, 1986. 450 p.Gao Wen. Han bei ji shi [Collected Explanations of Han Inscriptions]. Kaifeng: Henan University Press; 1985. 528 p. (In Chinese)高文. 汉碑集释. 开封: 河南大学出版社, 1985. 528 頁 [Гао Вэнь. Комментарии к ханьским эпиграфическим текстам. Кайфэн: Хэнань дасюэ сюбаньше, 1985. 528 с.]Ma Jixing. Mawangdui gu yi shu kaoshi [Critical Elucidation of the Ancient Medical Texts from Mawangdui]. Changsha; 1992. (In Chinese)馬繼興. 馬王堆古醫書考釋. 長沙, 1992. [Ма Цзисин. Древние медицинские тексты из Мавандуя. Чанша, 1992.]Bashkeev VV. The first results of textological analysis of Gao-di-ji Shan from Han-shu in Comparison with Corresponding Chapters from Shi-ji. Society and State in China. 2018;48(2):432–449. (In Russ).Башкеев В.В. Первые результаты текстологического анализа Гао-ди цзи шан из Хань шу в сопоставлении с соответствующими главами из Ши цзи // Общество и государство в Китае. 2018. Т. 48. № 2. С. 432–449.Bashkeev VV. About Structure of Presentation of Events in Section Diji of Han Shu. On the basis of chapter Gao-di-ji Sia Data. Society and State in China. 2019;49(1):87–107. (In Russ).Башкеев В.В. О структуре изложения событий в разделе дицзи Хань шу. На материале главы Гао-ди цзи ся // Общество и государство в Китае. 2019. Т. 49. № 1. С. 87–107.Ulyanov MYu. Textual Aspects of the Study of Chunqiu Zuozhuan: To Problem of Distinguishing and Characterizing Structural-Genre Groups. Society and State in China. 2011;41(1):43–59. (In Russ).Ульянов М.Ю. Текстологические аспекты изучения Чуньцю Цзочжуань: к проблеме выделения и характеристики структурно-жанровых групп // Общество и государство в Китае. 2011. Т. 41. № 1. С. 43–59.Ulyanov MYu. Structure of the “Commenting Complex” of Chunqiu Zuozhuan (Commentary of Zuo to Chunqiu): Balance of “Historical” and “Canonical”. In: Rosenberg collection: Oriental Studies and Materials. Saint Petersburg; 2014. P:248–270. (In Russ).Ульянов М.Ю. Структура «комментирующего комплекса» Чуньцю Цзочжуань (комментарий Цзо к Чуньцю): соотношение «исторического» и «каноноведческого». В кн.: Розенберговский сборник: востоковедные исследования и материалы. СПб, 2014. С. 248–270.Bashkeev VV, Ulyanov MYu, Tseluyko MS. Podkhody k issledovaniyu politicheskikh protsessov v opisanii drevnei i srednevekovoi istorii Kitaya i stran Yugo-Vostochnoi Azii. In: Otgolosok proshedshego v budushchem. Moscow: Izdatelstvo PSTGU; 2012. P:47–71. (In Russ).Башкеев В.В., Ульянов М.Ю., Целуйко М.С. Подходы к исследованию политических процессов в описании древней и средневековой истории Китая и стран Юго-Восточной Азии. В кн.: Отголосок прошедшего в будущем. М. : Издательство ПСТГУ, 2012. С. 41–71.Deopik DV. Opyt kolichestvennogo analiza drevnei vostochnoi letopisi “Chun Qiu” [Experience of Quantitative Analysis of the Ancient Eastern Chronicle “Chun Qiu”]. In: Konfutsyeva letopis Chun Qiu (Chun Qiu /Springs and Autumns/ by Confucius). Monastyrev N, trans., Karapetyants AM, editor. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura; 1999. P:195–234. (In Russ).Деопик Д.В. Опыт количественного анализа древней восточной летописи «Чуньцю». В кн.: Конфуциева летопись «Чуньцю» («Вёсны и осени») / пер. и примеч. Н.И. Монастырева; отв. ред. А.М. Карапетьянц. М.: Восточная литература, 1999. С. 195–234.