Эукариоты – группа организмов с богатейшим биотехнологическим потенциалом, а создание классификационной системы этих организмов, обладающей эвристической силой и большими прогностическими возможностями востребовано биотехнологическим сообществом. Требования, предъявляемые к биологической классификации со стороны прикладных наук (и биотехнологии в частности), сводятся к:

1) Стабильности классификационной системы.

2) Верным отражением ее природных взаимосвязей, т.е. эвристической силе и прогностическим возможностям.

В статье проведен ретроспективный обзор построений в мегасистематике эукариот, дана оценка стабильности текущей системы этих организмов и намечены подходы к созданию интерфейса, обеспечивающего взаимодействие таксономического и биотехнологического сообществ.

animalsbiotechnologyfungikingdomsmegasystematicsmolecular taxonomyphylogenomicsplantsprotiststaxonomic rankAmoebozoaAlveolataDiscobaCryptistaHaptistaJakobeaLoukozoaOpisthokontaPlantaeRhizariaStramenopilaбиотехнологиигрибыживотныемегасистематикамолекулярная таксономияпротистырастениятаксономический рангфилогеномикацарстваAmoebozoaAlveolataDiscobaCryptistaHaptistaJakobeaLoukozoaOpisthokontaPlantaeRhizariaStramenopilaБИН РАНАААА-А19-119020890079-61.Sweetlove L. Number of species on Earth tagged at 8.7 million. Nature. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.498Sweetlove L. Number of species on Earth tagged at 8.7 million // Nature. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.4982.Starobogatov Ya. I. Natural system and artificial systems (goal and principles of taxonomy). Vestnik zoologii=Zoodiversity. 1989;(6):3–7. (In Russ.).Старобогатов Я. И. Естественная система и искусственные системы (цель и принципы работы систематика) / Я. И. Старобогатов // Вестник зоологии. – 1989. – № 6. – С. 3–7.3.Zmitrovich I. V., Psurtseva N. V., Belova N. V. Evolutionary and taxonomic aspects of the search and study of lignindestroying fungi as active producers of oxidative enzymes. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya=Mycology and Phytopathology. 2007;41(1):57–78. (In Russ.).Змитрович И. В. Эволюционно-таксономические аспекты поиска и изучения лигнинразрушающих грибов – активных продуцентов окислительных ферментов / И. В. Змитрович, Н. В. Псурцева, Н. В. Белова // Микология и фитопатология. – 2007. – Т. 41. – Вып. 1. – С. 57–78.4.Zmitrovich I. V., Bondartseva M. A., Arefyev S. P., et al. Professor Solomon P. Wasser and Medicinal Mushroom Science with a special attention to the problems of mycotherapy in oncology. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2022;24(1):13–26. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2021041831Zmitrovich I. V., Bondartseva M. A., Arefyev S. P., et al. Professor Solomon P. Wasser and Medicinal Mushroom Science with a special attention to the problems of mycotherapy in oncology // International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2022. Vol. 24, no. 1. P. 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2021041831.5.Kusakin O. G., Drozdov A. L., eds. Phylem of the organic beings. Part 1. Prolegomena to the construction of the phylem. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 1994. 282 p. (In Russ.).Кусакин О. Г. Филема органического мира. Ч. 1. Пролегомены к построению филемы / О. Г. Кусакин, А. Л. Дроздов. – СПб.: Наука, 1994. – 282 с.6.Kusakin O. G., Drozdov A. L., eds. Phylem of the organic beings. Part 2: Prokaryota, Eukaryota: Microsporobiontes, Archemonadobiontes, Euglenobiontes, Myxobiontes, Rhodobiontes, Alveolates, Heterokontes. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 1997. 381 p. (In Russ.).Кусакин О. Г. Филема органического мира. Ч. 2: Prokaryota, Eukaryota: Microsporobiontes, Archemonadobiontes, Euglenobiontes, Myxobiontes, Rhodobiontes, Alveolates, Heterokontes / О. Г. Кусакин, А. Л. Дроздов. – СПб.: Наука, 1997. 381 с.7.Cavalier-Smith T. Amoeboflagellates and mitochondrial cristae in eukaryote evolution: megasystematics of the new protozoan subkingdoms eozoa and neozoa. Archiv für Protistenkunde. 1997;147(3–4):237–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80051-6Cavalier-Smith T. Amoeboflagellates and mitochondrial cristae in eukaryote evolution: megasystematics of the new protozoan subkingdoms eozoa and neozoa // Archiv für Protistenkunde. 1997. Vol. 147, no. 3–4. P. 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80051-68.Drozdov A. L. Principle of conservatism of cellular structures as the basis for construction of the multikingdom system of the organic word. In: Abdurakhmonov I. Y., ed. Phylogenetics. London: IntechOpen; 2017. 120 p. https://doi.org/ 10.5772/intechopen.68562Drozdov A. L. Principle of conservatism of cellular structures as the basis for construction of the multikingdom system of the organic word // In: Phylogenetics / ed. Abdurakhmonov I. Y. London: IntechOpen; 2017. 120 p. https://doi.org/ 10.5772/intechopen.685629.Merezhkovsky K. S., ed. Conspective course of general botany. Part 1. Kazan; 1910. 170 p. (In Russ.).Мережковский К. С. Конспективный курс общей ботаники. Ч. 1 / К. С. Мережковский. – Казань, 1910. – 170 с.10.Chatton E. Pansporella perplexa, amoebien a spores protégées parasite des Daphnies. Réflexions sur la biologie et la phylogenie des Protozoaires. Annales des sciences naturelles, series Zoologie. 1925;8(1–2):5–86.Chatton E. Pansporella perplexa, amoebien a spores protégées parasite des Daphnies. Réflexions sur la biologie et la phylogenie des Protozoaires // Annales des sciences naturelles, series Zoologie. 1925. Vol. 8, no. 1–2. P. 5–86.11.Hall R. P., ed. Protozoology. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1953. 682 p.Protozoology / ed. Hall R. P. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1953. 682 p.12.Chadefaud M., ed. Les végétaux non vasculaires (Cryptogamie). T. 1. Paris: Masson; 1960. 1018 p.Les végétaux non vasculaires (Cryptogamie). T. 1 / ed. Chadefaud M. Paris: Masson; 1960. 1018 p.13.Whittaker R. H. New concept of kingdoms of organisms. Science. 1969;163:150–160.Whittaker R.H. New concept of kingdoms of organisms // Science. 1969. Vol. 163. P. 150–160.14.Kusakin O.G., Starobogatov Ya.I. To the problem of the highest taxonomic categories of the organic world. Problems of evolution. T. 3. Novosibirsk; 1973. P. 95–103. (In Russ.).Кусакин О. Г. К вопросу о наивысших таксономических категориях органического мира / О. Г. Кусакин, Я. И. Старобогатов // Проблемы эволюции. – Новосибирск, 1973. – Т. 3. – С. 95–103.15.Starobogatov Ya. I. On the question of the number of kingdoms of eukaryotic organisms. In: Systematics of protozoans and their phylogenetic relations with lower eukaryotes. Leningrad; 1986. P. 4–25. (In Russ.).Старобогатов Я. И. К вопросу о числе царств эукариотных организмов / Я. И. Старобогатов // Систематика простейших и их филогенетические связи с низшими эукариотами. – Ленинград, 1986. – С. 4–25.16.Starobogatov Ya. I. The position of flagellated protists in the system of lower eukaryotes. Cytology. 1995;37:1030–1035.Starobogatov Ya. I. The position of flagellated protists in the system of lower eukaryotes // Cytology. 1995. Vol. 37. P. 1030–1035.17.Takhtadjan A.L. Four kingdoms of the organic world. Priroda = Nature. 1973;(2):22–32. (In Russ.).Тахтаджян А. Л. Четыре царства органического мира / А. Л. Тахтаджян // Природа. – 1973. – № 2. – С. 22–32.18.Margulis L., ed. Symbiosis in cell evolution. Life and its environment on early Earth. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman; 1981. 415 p.Symbiosis in cell evolution. Life and its environment on early Earth / ed. Margulis L. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman; 1981. 415 p.19.Margulis L., ed. The role of symbiosis in cell evolution. Moscow: Mir; 1983. 352 p. (In Russ.).Маргелис Л. Роль симбиоза в эволюции клетки / Л. Маргелис. – Москва: Мир, 1983. – 352 с.20.Cavalier-Smith T. The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2002;52(Pt.1):7–76. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-1-7Cavalier-Smith T. The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification // International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2002. Vol. 52. Part 1. P. 7–76. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-1-721.Leontiev D. V., Akulov A. Yu. Ecomorpheme of the organic world: the experience of construction. Zhurnal obshchey biologii = Journal of General Biology. 2004;65(6):500–526. (In Russ.).Леонтьев Д. В. Экоморфема органического мира: опыт построения / Д. В. Леонтьев, А. Ю. Акулов // Журнал общей биологии. – 2004. – Т. 65. – № 6. – С. 500–526.22.Zmitrovich I. V., ed. Epimorphology and tectomorphology of higher fungi. Saint Petersburg; 2010. 272 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1880.7364. (In Russ.).Змитрович И. В. Эпиморфология и тектоморфология высших грибов / И. В. Змитрович. – Санкт-Петербург, 2010. – 272 с. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1880.736423.Doweld A., ed. Prosyllabus tracheophytorum: tentamen systematis plantarum vascularium (Tracheophyta). Moscow: Geos; 2001. 200 p.Prosyllabus tracheophytorum: tentamen systematis plantarum vascularium (Tracheophyta) / ed. Doweld A. Moscow: Geos, 2001. 200 p.24.Zmitrovich I. V., Perelygin V. V., Sytin A. K., et al. Discussion concerning key terms in systematic and applied mycology. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2021;23(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2020037265Zmitrovich I. V., Perelygin V. V., Sytin A. K., et al. Discussion concerning key terms in systematic and applied mycology // International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 2021. Vol. 23, no. 1. Р. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.202003726525.Seravin L. N. Macrosystem of flagellates. In: Principles of building a macrosystem of multicellular animals. Leningrad; 1980: 4–22. (In Russ.).Серавин Л. Н. Макросистема жгутиконосцев / Л. Н. Серавин // Принципы построения макросистемы многоклеточных животных. – Ленинград: Зоологический институт АН СССР, 1980. – С. 4–22.26.Levine N. D., Corliss J. O., Cox F. E., et al. A new revised classification of Protozoa. Journal of Protozoology. 1980;27(1):37–58.Levine N. D., Corliss J. O., Cox F. E., et al. A new revised classification of Protozoa // Journal of Protozoology. 1980. Vol. 27, no. 1. P. 37–58.27.Karpov S. A., ed. The system of Protista. Omsk, 1990. 192 p. (In Russ.).Карпов С. А. Система протистов / С. А. Карпов. – Омск, 1990. – 192 с.28.Adl S. M., Simpson A. G., Lane C. E., et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2012;59(5):429–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.xAdl S. M., Simpson A. G., Lane C. E., et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes // Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2012. Vol. 59, no. 5. P. 429–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x29.Adl S. M., Bass D., Lane C. E., et al. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2018;66(1):4–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12691Adl S. M., Bass D., Lane C. E., et al. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes // Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2018. Vol. 66, no. 1. P. 4–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.1269130.Wasser S. P., Kondratieva N. V., Masyuk N. P., et al., eds. The algae. A guide. Kiev; 1989. 608 p. (In Russ.).Вассер С. П. Водоросли. Справочник / С. П. Вассер, Н. В. Кондратьева, Н. П. Масюк [и др.] – Киев, 1989. – 608 с.31.Karpov S. A., ed. Protists: A guide to Zoology. Part 1. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 2000. 679 p. (In Russ.).Протисты: Руководство по зоологии. Ч. 1 / под редакцией С. А. Карпова. – Санкт-Петербург: Наука, 2000. – 679 с.32.Leontiev D. V. General biology: a system of the organic world. Lecture course. Kharkov, 2013. 84 p. (In Russ.).Леонтьев Д. В. Общая биология: система органического мира. Курс лекций / Д. В. Леонтьев. – Харьков, 2013. – 84 с.33.Yakovlev G. P., Goncharov M. Yu., eds. Botany: a textbook for universities. Saint Petersburg: SpecLit; 2018. 879 p. (In Russ.).Ботаника: учебник для вузов / под редакцией Г. П. Яковлева, М. Ю. Гончарова. – СПб.: СпецЛит, 2018. – 879 с.34.Linné C., ed. Systema Naturae, ed. 13. Vindobonae: Typis Ioannis Thomae; 1767-1770.Systema Naturae, ed. 13 / ed. Linné C. Vindobonae: Typis Ioannis Thomae; 1767-1770.35.Fries E. M., ed. Systema mycologicum, sistens fungorum ordines, genera et species, huc usque cognitas, quas ad normam methodi naturalis determinavit, disposuii atque descripsit. Vol. 1. Gryphiswald; 1821. 520 p.Systema mycologicum, sistens fungorum ordines, genera et species, huc usque cognitas, quas ad normam methodi naturalis determinavit, disposuii atque descripsit / ed. Fries E. M. Gryphiswald, 1821. Vol. 1. 520 p.36.Bory de Saint-Vincent J.B., ed. Psychodiaire. In: Dictionnaire classique d’Histoire naturelle, 8. Paris; 1925.Bory de Saint-Vincent J.B. Psychodiaire // In: Dictionnaire classique d’Histoire naturelle, 8. Paris; 1925.37.Haeckel E., ed. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Bd 2. Berlin; 1866. 462 p.Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Bd 2 / ed. Haeckel E. Berlin; 1866. 462 p.38.Haeckel E., ed. System der Protisten. Leipzig; 1878. 104 p.System der Protisten / ed. Haeckel E. Leipzig; 1878. 104 p.39.Haeckel E., ed. Die Lebenswunder. Gemeinverständliche Studien über Biologische Phylosophie. Stuttgart; 1904.Die Lebenswunder. Gemeinverständliche Studien über Biologische Phylosophie / ed. Haeckel E. Stuttgart; 1904.40.Cohn F. Untersuchungen uber Bakterien II. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen. 1875;3:141–207.Cohn F. Untersuchungen uber Bakterien II // Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen. 1875. Vol. 3. P. 141–207.41.Němec B., ed. Uvod do všeobecne biologie. Praha, 1929.Uvod do všeobecne biologie / ed. Němec B. Praha; 1929.42.Taylor F. G. R. Problems in the development of an explicit hypothetical phylogeny of the lower eukaryotes. BioSystems. 1978;10:67–89.Taylor F.G.R. Problems in the development of an explicit hypothetical phylogeny of the lower eukaryotes // BioSystems. 1978. Vol. 10. P. 67–89.43.Stewart K. D., Mattox K. R. Phylogeny of phytoflagellates. In: Development in marine biology. V. 2. New York; 1980:433–462.Stewart K.D., Mattox K.R. Phylogeny of phytoflagellates // In: Development in marine biology. Vol. 2. New York, 1980. P. 433–462.44.Cavalier-Smith T. The excavate protozoan phyla Metamonada Grassé emend. (Anaeromonadea, Parabasalia, Carpediemonas, Eopharyngia) and Loukozoa emend. (Jakobea, Malawimonas): their evolutionary affinities and new higher taxa. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2003;53(6):1741–1758. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02548-0Cavalier-Smith T. The excavate protozoan phyla Metamonada Grassé emend. (Anaeromonadea, Parabasalia, Carpediemonas, Eopharyngia) and Loukozoa emend. (Jakobea, Malawimonas): their evolutionary affinities and new higher taxa // International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2003. Vol. 53, no. 6. P. 1741–1758. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02548-045.Seravin L. N. The main types and forms of the fine structure of mitochondrial cristae, the degree of their evolutionary stability (ability to morphological transformations). Cytology. 1993;35:3–34.Серавин Л. Н. Основные типы и формы тонкого строения крист митохондрий, степень их эволюционной стабильности (способность к морфологическим трансформациям) / Л. Н. Серавин // Цитология. – 1993. – Т. 35. – С. 3–34.46.Cavalier-Smith T. The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2002;52(2):297–354. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-2-297Cavalier-Smith T. The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa // International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2002. Vol. 52, no. 2. P. 297–354. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-2-29747.Roger A. J. Thomas Cavalier-Smith (1942–2021). Current Biology. 2021;31(16):R977–R981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.00Roger A. J. Thomas Cavalier-Smith (1942–2021) // Current Biology. 2021. Vol. 31, no. 16. P. R977–R981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.0048.Cavalier-Smith T. The evolutionary origin and phylogeny of microtubules spindles and eukaryotic flagella. BioSystems. 1978;1:93–114.Cavalier-Smith T. The evolutionary origin and phylogeny of microtubules spindles and eukaryotic flagella // BioSystems. 1978. Vol. 1. P. 93–114.49.Cavalier-Smith T. Eukaryote kingdoms: seven or nine? BioSystems. 1981;14:461–484.Cavalier-Smith T. Eukaryote kingdoms: seven or nine? // BioSystems. 1981. Vol. 14. P. 461–484.50.Cavalier-Smith T., Chao E. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Protoplasma. 2020;257:621–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01442-7Cavalier-Smith T., Chao E. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria) // Protoplasma. 2020. Vol. 257. P. 621–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01442-751.Karatygin I. V. Problems of macrosystematics of fungi. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 1999;33(3):150–165. (In Russ.).Каратыгин И. В. Проблемы макросистематики грибов / И. В. Каратыгин // Микология и фитопатология. – 1999. – Т. 33. – № 3. – С. 150–165.52.Woese C. R., Fox G. E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 1977;74(1):5088–5090.Woese C. R., Fox G. E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 1977. Vol. 74, no. 1. P. 5088–5090.53.Patterson D. J. Stramenopiles: chromophytes from a protistological perspective. In: The chromophyte algae: problems and perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1989:357–379.Patterson D. J. Stramenopiles: chromophytes from a protistological perspective // In: The chromophyte algae: problems and perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon Press;1989. P. 357–379.54.Nikolaev S. I., Berney C., Fahrni J. F., et al. The twilight of Heliozoa and rise of Rhizaria, an emerging supergroup of amoeboid eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 2004;101(21):8066–8071.Nikolaev S. I., Berney C., Fahrni J. F., et al. The twilight of Heliozoa and rise of Rhizaria, an emerging supergroup of amoeboid eukaryotes // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 2004. Vol. 101, no. 21. P. 8066–8071.55.Shalchian-Tabrizi K., Eikrem W., Klaveness D., et al. Telonemia, a new protist phylum with affinity to chromist lineages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2006;273(1595):1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3515Shalchian-Tabrizi K., Eikrem W., Klaveness D., et al. Telonemia, a new protist phylum with affinity to chromist lineages // Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2006. Vol. 273 (1595). P. 1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.351556.Cavalier-Smith T., Chao E., Lewis J. Multiple origins of Heliozoa from flagellate ancestors: New cryptist subphylum Corbihelia, superclass Corbistoma, and monophyly of Haptista, Cryptista, Hacrobia and Chromista. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2015;93:331–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.004Cavalier-Smith T., Chao E., Lewis J. Multiple origins of Heliozoa from flagellate ancestors: New cryptist subphylum Corbihelia, superclass Corbistoma, and monophyly of Haptista, Cryptista, Hacrobia and Chromista // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2015. Vol. 93. P. 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.00457.Ball S., Colleoni C., Cenci U., et al. The evolution of glycogen and starch metabolism in eukaryotes gives molecular clues to understand the establishment of plastid endosymbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011;62(6):1775–1801. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq411Ball S., Colleoni C., Cenci U., et al. The evolution of glycogen and starch metabolism in eukaryotes gives molecular clues to understand the establishment of plastid endosymbiosis // Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011. Vol. 62, no. 6. P. 1775–1801. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq41158.Hampl V., Hug L., Leigh J. W., et al. Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 2009;106(10):3859–3864. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807880106Hampl V., Hug L., Leigh J. W., et al. Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups” // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 2009. Vol. 106, no. 10. P. 3859–3864. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.080788010659.Cavalier-Smith T. Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: Euglenoid, dinoflagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 1999;46(4):347–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04614.xCavalier-Smith T. Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: Euglenoid, dinoflagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree // The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 1999. Vol. 46, no. 4. P. 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04614.x60.Brown M. W., Sharpe S. C., Silberman J. D., et al. Phylogenomics demonstrates that breviate flagellates are related to opisthokonts and apusomonads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2013; 280(1769):17–55. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1755Brown M. W., Sharpe S. C., Silberman J. D. et al. Phylogenomics demonstrates that breviate flagellates are related to opisthokonts and apusomonads // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2013. Vol. 280 (1769). P. 17–55. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.175561.Cavalier-Smith T. The origin of fungi and pseudofungi. In: Evolutionary biology of Fungi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987:339–353.Cavalier-Smith T. The origin of fungi and pseudofungi // In: Evolutionary biology of Fungi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. P. 339–35362.Cavalier-Smith T. Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. European Journal of Protistology. 2013;49(2):115–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001Cavalier-Smith T. Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa // European Journal of Protistology. 2013. Vol. 49, no. 2. P. 115–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.00163.Corliss J.O. The kingdom Protista and its 45 phyla. BioSystems. 1984;17(2):87–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(84)90003-0Corliss J. O. The kingdom Protista and its 45 phyla // BioSystems. 1984. Vol. 17, no. 2. P. 87–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(84)90003-064.Burki F., Roger A. J., Brown M. W., et al. The new tree of eukaryotes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2020;35(1):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.008Burki F., Roger A. J., Brown M. W., et al. The new tree of eukaryotes // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2020. Vol. 35, no. 1. P. 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.00865.Cerón-Romero M. A., Maurer-Alcalá X. X., Grattepanche J. D., et al. PhyloToL: A taxon/gene-Rich phylogenomic pipeline to explore genome evolution of diverse eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2019;36(8):1831–1842. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz103Cerón-Romero M. A., Maurer-Alcalá X. X., Grattepanche J. D., et al. PhyloToL: A taxon/gene-Rich phylogenomic pipeline to explore genome evolution of diverse eukaryotes // Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2019. Vol. 36, no. 8. P. 1831–1842. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz10366.Strassert J. F. H., Irisarri I., Williams T.A., et al. A molecular timescale for eukaryote evolution with implications for the origin of red algalderived plastids. Nature Communications. 2021;12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22044-zStrassert J. F. H., Irisarri I., Williams T. A., et al. A molecular timescale for eukaryote evolution with implications for the origin of red algalderived plastids // Nature Communications. 2021. Vol. 12. P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22044-z67.Roger A. J., Muñoz-Gómez S. A., Kamikawa R. The origin and diversification of mitochondria. Current Biology. 2017;27(21):R1177–R1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.015Roger A. J., Muñoz-Gómez S. A., Kamikawa R. The origin and diversification of mitochondria // Current Biology. 2017. Vol. 27, no. 21. P. R1177–R1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.01568.Cavalier-Smith T. Chloroplast evolution: secondary symbiogenesis and multiple losses. Current Biology. 2002;12(2):R62–R64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00675-3Cavalier-Smith T. Chloroplast evolution: secondary symbiogenesis and multiple losses // Current Biology. 2002. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. R62–R64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00675-369.Zmitrovich I. V. A revised eukaryote tree: the case for a euglenozoan root. International Journal on Algae. 2003;5(2):1–38.Zmitrovich I. V. A revised eukaryote tree: the case for a euglenozoan root // International Journal on Algae. 2003. Vol. 5, no. 2. P. 1–38.70.Bodył A., Stiller J., Mackiewicz P. Chromalveolate plastids: direct descent or multiple endosymbioses? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2009;24:119–121.Bodył A., Stiller J., Mackiewicz P. Chromalveolate plastids: direct descent or multiple endosymbioses? // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2009. Vol. 24. P. 119–121.71.Laumer C. E., Fernández R., Lemer S., et al. Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2019;286: 20190831.Laumer C. E., Fernández R., Lemer S., et al. Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2019. Vol. 286. P. 20190831.72.Tedersoo L., Sánchez-Ramírez S., Kõljalg U., et al. High-level classification of the fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses. Fungal Diversity. 2018;90:135–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0(0123456789Tedersoo L., Sánchez-Ramírez S., Kõljalg U., et al. High-level classification of the fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses // Fungal Diversity. 2018. Vol. 90. P. 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0(012345678973.Linnaeus C., Salm L., eds. Species Plantarum. T. 2. Holm; 1753.Species Plantarum. T. 2 / eds. Linnaeus C., Salm L. Holm; 1753.74.Decandolle A.P., ed. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. Paris: Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Wurtz; 1824.Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis/ ed. Decandolle A. P. Paris: Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Wurtz; 1824.75.Vasilyeva L. Systematics in mycology. Bibliotheca Mycologica. 1999;178:1‒253.Vasilyeva L. Systematics in mycology // Bibliotheca Mycologica. 1999. Vol. 178. P. 1‒253.76.Cantino P.D., de Queiroz K., eds. PhyloCode: A phylogenetic code of biological nomenclature. PhyloCode; 2003. 62 p.PhyloCode: A phylogenetic code of biological nomenclature / eds. Cantino P.D., de Queiroz K. PhyloCode; 2003. 62 p.77.Ereshefsky M., ed. The Poverty of the Linnean Hierarchy. A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. 328 p.The Poverty of the Linnean Hierarchy. A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy / ed. Ereshefsky M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. 328 p.78.Kutikova L. A., ed. Fauna of aeration tanks. Leningrad; 1984. 264 p. (In Russ.).Фауна аэротенков / под редакцией Кутиковой Л. А. – Ленинград: ЗИН АН СССР, 1984. – 264 с.79.Fleurence J., Levine I., eds. Seaweed in health and disease prevention. Elsevier; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-02206-XSeaweed in health and disease prevention / eds. Fleurence J., Levine I. Elsevier; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-02206-X80.Hyde K.D., Xu J., Rapior S., et al. The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially. Fungal Diversity. 2019;97:1–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00430-9Hyde K. D., Xu J., Rapior S., et al. The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially // Fungal Diversity. 2019, Vol. 97. P. 1–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00430-981.Knoerzer K., et al, eds. Innovative food processing technologies. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. 300 p.Innovative food processing technologies / ed. Knoerzer K., et al. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. 300 p.82.Biotechnology in Animal agriculture: status and current issues. CRS report for congress. 2011. URL: https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20110519_RL33334_11709812983bd008a37ba36f9a304a89bb8642cb.pdf83.Ragon M., Fontain M. C., Moreira D., et al. Different biogeographic patterns of prokaryotes and microbial eukaryotes in epilithic biofilms. Molecular Ecology. 2012;21:3852–3868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05659.xRagon M., Fontain M. C., Moreira D., et al. Different biogeographic patterns of prokaryotes and microbial eukaryotes in epilithic biofilms // Molecular Ecology. 2012. Vol. 21. P. 3852–3868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-94X.2012.05659.x