Quantitative stratification of liver cirrhosis according to Child–Pugh classes based on magnetic resonance imaging
- Authors: Savchenkov Y.N.1,2, Trufanov G.E.3, Fokin V.A.3, Ionova E.A.1, Savchenkova A.P.4, Prosikov V.A.5, Ryzhkov A.V.3, Galyan T.N.6
-
Affiliations:
- Burnazyan Federal Biophysical Medical Center
- Demikhov City Clinical Hospital
- Almazov National Medical Research Centre
- Scientific and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies
- Demikhov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
- Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
- Section: Original articles
- Submitted: 05.03.2026
- Accepted: 03.05.2026
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/RMMArep/article/view/703838
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rmmar703838
- ID: 703838
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Objective noninvasive stratification of liver cirrhosis severity remains an important task in radiological diagnostics. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, including native T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction enable assessment of parenchymal structural remodeling and the severity of portal hypertension; however, their concordance with the clinical classification based on the Child-Pugh score has not been sufficiently investigated.
Objective. To comparatively evaluate the diagnostic performance of native T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction of the liver and spleen for stratification of cirrhosis according to Child-Pugh classes.
Materials and Methods. This retrospective study included 65 patients with liver cirrhosis examined on a high-field 1.5 T Ingenia Ambition S scanner (Philips). All patients underwent multiparametric MRI with quantitative assessment of native T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction of the liver and spleen. Stratification was performed according to Child-Pugh classes A, B, and C. Intergroup differences were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with pairwise comparisons by the Mann-Whitney test. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC analysis with calculation of AUROC and 95% confidence intervals (bootstrap, 2000 iterations) and comparison of curves by the DeLong test. Multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (FDR <0.05).
Results. The most pronounced and statistically robust differences between Child-Pugh classes were observed for hepatic ECV (H = 38.87; FDR = 0.001; ε² = 0.595). Splenic ECV also demonstrated interclass differences (FDR = 0.002; ε² = 0.199), although statistical robustness was not preserved when discriminating adjacent classes B-C. Native liver T1 mapping showed nominal intergroup significance without preservation after FDR correction (FDR = 0.061; ε² = 0.067), whereas splenic T1 mapping revealed no differences (FDR = 0.952). In all pairwise comparisons, the highest AUROC values were obtained for hepatic ECV (0.921-1.000), significantly exceeding other parameters (p <0.05, DeLong test). The strongest correlation with the total Child-Pugh score was observed for hepatic ECV (ρ = 0.761; FDR <0.001).
Conclusion. Among quantitative MRI parameters, hepatic extracellular volume fraction demonstrates the greatest stability and the highest concordance with the clinical stratification of cirrhosis according to the Child-Pugh classification. Splenic extracellular volume fraction shows lower AUROC values than hepatic extracellular volume fraction; however, it outperforms native T1 mapping of the liver and spleen in discriminating classes A-B and A-C. When comparing classes B and C, the diagnostic performance of splenic extracellular volume fraction decreases, whereas native T1 mapping of the liver and spleen is characterized by lower AUROC values for discrimination between these classes.
Full Text
About the authors
Yury N. Savchenkov
Burnazyan Federal Biophysical Medical Center; Demikhov City Clinical Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: yura_savchenkov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8258-522X
SPIN-code: 3815-1678
MD, Cand.Sci (Medicine), Assistant of the Dept, Head of the Dept of Radiation Diagnostics
Russian Federation, 123098, 23 Marshala Novikova str., Moscow, Russia; 109263, 4 Shkuleva str., Moscow, RussiaGennady E. Trufanov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Email: trufanovge@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1611-5000
SPIN-code: 3139-3581
Scopus Author ID: 6602602324
ResearcherId: ABE-3366-2020
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of Dept
2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, 197341, RussiaVladimir A. Fokin
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Email: vladfokin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2937-6322
SPIN-code: 6072-3550
Scopus Author ID: 24597519500
ResearcherId: P-9511-2015
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor of Dept
Russian Federation, 2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, 197341, RussiaElena A. Ionova
Burnazyan Federal Biophysical Medical Center
Email: ionela60@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6084-2061
SPIN-code: 3115-2872
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of Dept
Russian Federation, 109263, 4 Shkuleva str., Moscow, RussiaAlina P. Savchenkova
Scientific and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies
Email: alinchik25@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-0100-0306
SPIN-code: 9167-7924
radiologist
Russian Federation, 127051, Russia, Moscow, Petrovka str., 24, building 1Valentin A. Prosikov
Demikhov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
Email: yura_savchenkov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-6719-4900
SPIN-code: 4903-6654
radiologist
Russian Federation, 1/1 Velozavodskaya str., Moscow, 115280, RussiaAnton V. Ryzhkov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Email: ryzhkov@almazovcentre.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5226-1104
SPIN-code: 6745-3075
MD, radiologist; Head of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dept
Russian Federation, 2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, 197341, RussiaTatiana N. Galyan
Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
Email: galyan.tn@med.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4751-5119
SPIN-code: 6821-5834
Scopus Author ID: 57192999227
ResearcherId: AOH-3820-2022
MD, Cand.Sci (Medicine), Head of the Dept of Radiation Diagnostics
Russian Federation, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Abrikosovsky lane, 2.References
- Tham EKJ, Tan DJH, Danpanichkul P, et al. The Global Burden of Cirrhosis and Other Chronic Liver Diseases in 2021. Liver Int. 2025. doi: 10.1111/liv.70001
- Cerrito L, Galasso L, Iaccarino J, et al. Present and Future Perspectives in the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025;18:1321. doi: 10.3390/ph18091321
- Zeng X, Huang D, Zhu Z, et al. Mechanism-guided drug development and treatment for liver fibrosis: a clinical perspective. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1574385. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1574385
- Tarannum S, Ilyas T, Tarannum Shaik S, et al. Assessment of the Child-Pugh score... Cureus. 2024;16:e73768. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73768
- Costa F, Wiedenmann B, Roderburg C, et al. Systemic treatment in patients with Child-Pugh B liver dysfunction. Cancer Med. 2023;12:12766-12778. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6033
- Huang W, Peng Y, Kang L. Advancements of non-invasive imaging technologies. VIEW. 2024. doi: 10.1002/VIW.20240010
- Xue S, Zhu Y, Shao M, et al. T1/T2 mapping as a non-invasive method. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025;25:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03216-0
- Serai SD, Robson MD, Tirkes T, et al. T1 Mapping of the Abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025;224:6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.31643
- Mesropyan N, Chang J, Lutz P, et al. Clinical validation of T1rho mapping. Eur Radiol. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11682-3
- Higashi M, Tanabe M, Yamane M, et al. Impact of fat on the apparent T1 value of the liver. Eur Radiol. 2023;33:6844-6851. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10052-0
- Obmann VC, Ardoino M, Klaus J, et al. MRI extracellular volume fraction in liver fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;60:1678-1688. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29259
- Mesropyan N, Kupczyk P, Dold L, et al. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis including extracellular volume fraction. Abdom Radiol. 2021;46:2458-2466. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02822-x
- Mesropyan N, Kupczyk PA, Dold L, et al. Assessment of liver cirrhosis severity with extracellular volume fraction MRI. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13340-9
- Maino C, Vernuccio F, Cannella R, et al. Non-invasive imaging biomarkers in chronic liver disease. Eur J Radiol. 2024;181:111749. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111749
- Mazzola M, Cannella R, Pilato G, et al. Quantitative liver MRI biomarkers: what the radiologist should know. J Med Imaging Interv Radiol. 2024;11:13. doi: 10.1186/s44326-024-00013-3
- Zhang H, Hao E, Xia D, et al. Estimating liver cirrhosis severity with extracellular volume fraction by spectral CT. Sci Rep. 2025;15:18343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03717-x
- Mesropyan N, Isaak A, Faron A, et al. Magnetic resonance parametric mapping of the spleen. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:85-93. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07080-5
- Catucci D, Obmann VC, Berzigotti A, et al. Noninvasive assessment of clinically significant portal hypertension. Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109958. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109958
Supplementary files


