Structural comparative analysis of T2T genome assemblies of Colletotrichum lini with different sets of chromosomes

Abstract

Background: The phytopathogen Colletotrichum lini is the causative agent of flax anthracnose. Its genome has accessory chromosomes, which, as shown in other species of the genus, can determine pathogenicity. However, the structural organization, degree of variability, and evolutionary relationships of these chromosomes in C. lini have remained virtually unexplored, since their analysis requires the presence of whole-genome assemblies of the telomere-to-telomere (T2T) level. The present study aims to fill the knowledge gap regarding the genomic diversity of C. lini by comparative analysis of T2T assemblies.

Aim: To study the structural diversity of the C. lini genome and to investigate the differences and relationships between the accessory chromosomes of C. lini strains with different sets of chromosomes.

Methods: The assembly of T2T-level genomes was carried out using sequencing data we had previously obtained via the Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Illumina platforms, utilizing Canu or Hifiasm assemblers followed by Racon, Medaka, and POLCA (after Canu) or Pilon (after Hifiasm) polishing tools. The quality of the assemblies was assessed using BUSCO, QUAST, and Merqury. Comparative genomic analysis was performed by whole-genome BLAST alignment with visualization of synteny in the syntenyPlotteR R package. Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed based on complete genome sequences by the SANS program with the inclusion of genomes of other species of the genus Colletotrichum with the "complete" assembly level available in the NCBI Genome database.

Results: The genomes of eight C. lini strains with a length of 53.7-54.7 Mb were assembled to the chromosome level: 12-14 chromosomes, BUSCO ≥98.7%. The core chromosomes (1-10) were highly conserved (size variability ≤3%), while the accessory ones (11-14) were rather variable (variability up to 38%). In strains without chromosomes 13 and 14, an increase in the size of chromosomes 11 and 12 was found. Major rearrangements were detected, including an inversion in chromosome 6 of strain #771 and inversions in accessory chromosomes of strain #391-4. Phylogenetic analysis of complete genomes showed clustering of C. lini strains in accordance with the set of accessory chromosomes. The closest species to C. lini was confirmed to be C. destructivum.

Conclusion: The study revealed a two-component architecture of the C. lini genome and demonstrated that intraspecific diversity is determined primarily by the set of accessory chromosomes, while the core chromosomes are structurally stable.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Elizaveta A. Ivankina

Email: sigova1567@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6457-0609
SPIN-code: 4624-7346
Russian Federation

Ekaterina M. Dvorianinova

Email: eugenevarenyuk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5060-9912
SPIN-code: 6778-0424
Russian Federation

Antoniy M. Kaplun

Email: atonkaplun@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-0453-0132
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Arkhipov

Email: arkhipov.aleksandr2.0@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-8289-0658
Russian Federation

Tatiana A. Rozhmina

Email: tatyana_rozhmina@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 9859-1518

Доктор биологических наук

Russian Federation

Elena N. Pushkova

Email: pushkova18@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6071-5919
SPIN-code: 5452-5753

Кандидат биологических наук

Russian Federation

Nataliya V. Melnikova

Email: mnv-4529264@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8083-3018
SPIN-code: 8105-6094

Кандидат биологических наук

Russian Federation

Alexey A. Dmitriev

Author for correspondence.
Email: alex_245@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6827-9584
SPIN-code: 4206-8226

Кандидат биологических наук

Russian Federation

References

  1. Campos JR, Severino P, Ferreira CS, et al. Linseed essential oil – source of lipids as active ingredients for pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2019;26(24):4537-4558. doi: 10.2174/0929867325666181031105603
  2. Deyholos MK. Bast fiber of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): Biological foundations of its ancient and modern uses. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. 2006;54(4):273-280. doi: 10.1560/IJPS_54_4_273
  3. Jhala AJ, Hall LM. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): current uses and future applications. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2010;4(9):4304-4312.
  4. Moyse J, Lecomte S, Marcou S, et al. Overview and management of the most common eukaryotic diseases of flax (Linum usitatissimum). Plants. 2023;12(15):2811. doi: 10.3390/plants12152811
  5. Kudryavtseva L.P. Fungal and bacterial infections of flax seeds. Agrarian science. 2022;(5):82-86. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2022-359-5-82-86
  6. Ogbuji NG, Agogbua JU. Genomics in plant pathogen identification and control. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2025;16:202510. doi: 3389/fpls.2025.1661432
  7. Loshakova N.I. Resistant varieties are an effective way to combat flax diseases Resistant varieties are an effective way to combat flax diseases. Plant protection and quarantine. 2011;9:43-44.
  8. Dvorianinova EM, Sigova EA, Mollaev TD, et al. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Colletotrichum lini Strains with Different Virulence on Flax. Journal of Fungi. 2024;10(1):32. doi: 10.3390/jof10010032
  9. Ivankina EA, Dvorianinova EM, Arkhipov AA, et al. T2T Colletotrichum lini Genomes with Hifiasm: ONT R9 and R10 Read Processing and Assembly Guidelines for Fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2026;12(1):45. doi: 10.3390/jof12010045
  10. Sigova EA, Dvorianinova EM, Arkhipov AA, et al. Nanopore Data-Driven T2T Genome Assemblies of Colletotrichum lini Strains. Journal of Fungi. 2024;10(12):874. doi: 10.3390/jof10120874
  11. Sigova EA, Dvorianinova EM, Rozhmina TA, et al. Complete Annotated Genome Assembly of Flax Pathogen Colletotrichum lini. Journal of Fungi. 2024;10(9):605. doi: 10.3390/jof10090605
  12. Bertazzoni S, Williams AH, Jones DA, et al. Accessories make the outfit: accessory chromosomes and other dispensable DNA regions in plant-pathogenic fungi. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2018;31(8):779-788. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-17-0135-FI
  13. Wang H, Huang R, Ren J, et al. The evolution of mini-chromosomes in the fungal genus Colletotrichum. mbio. 2023;14(4):e00629-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00629-23
  14. Bhadauria V, MacLachlan R, Pozniak C, et al. Genetic map-guided genome assembly reveals a virulence-governing minichromosome in the lentil anthracnose pathogen Colletotrichum lentis. New Phytologist. 2019;221(1):431-445. doi: 10.1111/nph.15369
  15. Wei H, Zhong Z, Li Z, et al. Loss of the accessory chromosome converts a pathogenic tree-root fungus into a mutualistic endophyte. Plant Communications. 2024;5(1):100672. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100672
  16. Mehrabi R, Bahkali AH, Abd-Elsalam KA, et al. Horizontal gene and chromosome transfer in plant pathogenic fungi affecting host range. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2011;35(3):542-554. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00263.x
  17. Shen W, Le S, Li Y, Hu F. SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PloS one. 2016;11(10):e0163962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163962
  18. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet journal. 2011;17(1):10-12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
  19. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114-2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
  20. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome research. 2017;27(5):722. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116
  21. Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome research. 2017;27(5):737. doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116
  22. Zimin AV, Salzberg SL. The genome polishing tool POLCA makes fast and accurate corrections in genome assemblies. PLoS computational biology. 2020;16(6):e1007981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007981
  23. Li H. New strategies to improve minimap2 alignment accuracy. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(23):4572-4574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab705
  24. Cheng H, Jarvis ED, Fedrigo O, et al. Haplotype-resolved assembly of diploid genomes without parental data. Nature biotechnology. 2022;40(9):1332-1335. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01261-x
  25. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PloS one. 2014;9(11):e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
  26. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv. 2013;arXiv:1303.3997. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997
  27. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10(2):giab008. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008
  28. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS computational biology. 2017;13(6):e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595
  29. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, et al. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(19):3210-3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351
  30. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072-1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086
  31. Rhie A, Walenz BP, Koren S, Phillippy AM. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome biology. 2020;21(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9
  32. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC bioinformatics. 2009;10(1):421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
  33. Quigley S, Damas J, Larkin DM, Farré M. syntenyPlotteR: a user-friendly R package to visualize genome synteny, ideal for both experienced and novice bioinformaticians. Bioinformatics Advances. 2023;3(1): vbad161. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad161
  34. Badet T, Oggenfuss U, Abraham L, et al. A 19-isolate reference-quality global pangenome for the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. BMC Biology. 2020;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-0744-3
  35. Möller M, Stukenbrock EH. Evolution and genome architecture in fungal plant pathogens. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2017;15(12):756-771. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.76
  36. Zhang Y, Zhou J, Zhao L, et al. A review of the pathogenicity mechanism of Verticillium dahliae in cotton. Journal of Cotton Research. 2022;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s42397-021-00111-6
  37. Gan P, Narusaka M, Kumakura N, et al. Genus-Wide Comparative Genome Analyses of Colletotrichum Species Reveal Specific Gene Family Losses and Gains during Adaptation to Specific Infection Lifestyles. Genome biology and evolution. 2016;8(5):1467-1481. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw089
  38. Damm U, O'Connell RJ, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex – hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops. Studies in Mycology. 2014;79:49-84. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.003

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 89324 от 21.04.2025.