Indexing metadata

CRISPR/Cas editing of a CPC gene in Arabidopsis thaliana

Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
1. Title Title of document CRISPR/Cas editing of a CPC gene in Arabidopsis thaliana
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Emil A. Khusnutdinov; Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian Federation
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Maria A. Panfilova; Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ufa State Petroleum University; Russian Federation
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Mikhail P. Terekhov; Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Russian Federation
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Elena V. Mikhaylova; Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ufa State Petroleum University
; Russian Federation
3. Subject Discipline(s)
3. Subject Keyword(s) DFR; anthocyanins; RT-PCR; genome editing
4. Description Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identification of target genes responsible for visible phenotypic effect may contribute to the development of transgene-free bioengineering strategies and application of crop varieties with edited genome. CAPRICE (CPC) is a single-repeat R3 MYB transcription factor, involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis and trichome formation. It is assumed that CPC controls the expression of Dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR), a key gene of anthocyanin biosynthesis.

AIM: The aim of the study was to determine whether knockout of the CPC gene using CRISPR/Cas9 results in visible anthocyanin accumulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three guide RNAs were designed to excise a MYB domain from the CPC gene of Arabidopsis thaliana. Anthocyanin content and expression of CPC and DFR genes were studied in edited plants.

RESULTS: The expected 662 bp deletion was detected in 2,7% of glufosinate-resistant plants, however none of the mutations were homozygous. Four edited lines were studied in four generations. An upregulation of the DFR gene was observed in edited lines, however CPC gene expression, anthocyanin content and trichome development were not significantly different from those in control plants. Moreover, in A. thaliana pigmentation did not directly depend on DFR or CPC gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CPC gene is involved in regulation of DFR gene expression and anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, however in case of mutations plants might utilize other transcription factors to maintain homeostasis. Therefore, CPC gene is not a suitable target for CRISPR/Cas studies in Arabidopsis.

5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Eco-Vector
6. Contributor Sponsor(s) Russian Science Foundation (20-74-10053)
7. Date (DD-MM-YYYY) 14.05.2024
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
8. Type Type Research Article
9. Format File format
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://journals.eco-vector.com/ecolgenet/article/view/624373
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.17816/ecogen624373
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI) (PDF (Eng)) 10.17816/ecogen624373-146800
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Ecological genetics; Vol 22, No 1 (2024)
12. Language English=en en
13. Relation Supp. Files Fig. 1. Genetic construct, used in the study. A gRNA assembled into B2103 vector (а), CRISPR/Cas9 final vector construction via Golden Gate assembly (b) (716KB) doi: 10.17816/ecogen624373-4185861
Fig. 2. Results of the editing of CPC gene. Location of gRNAs, MYB domain and CRISPR-induced deletion on the map of the CPC gene (a). Location of the mutation sites in CPC gene (b). PCR products of the CPC gene in control and first generation progeny of edited plants compared to Step100 long molecular weight marker (Biolabmix). Normal PCR product is 1036 bp, product with deletion is 374 bp (с) (703KB) doi: 10.17816/ecogen624373-4185862
Fig. 3. Analysis of the edited plants. Progeny of edited plant No. 6 (a). Extracts from dried leaf tissue in descendants of plant No. 43 in pH 1.0 buffer while determining anthocyanin content (b). CPC gene expression level in the second generation compared to actin reference gene expression (c). DFR gene expression level in the second generation compared to actin reference gene expression (d). Correlation measurement between DFR expression level and anthocyanin content in descendants of plant No. 43 and control plants on a scatter diagram (e). Asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference from control plants. Means and standard deviation (p < 0.05) were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) (927KB) doi: 10.17816/ecogen624373-4185863
Supplementary file 1 (662KB) doi: 10.17816/ecogen624373-4192898
Supplementary file 2 (845KB) doi: 10.17816/ecogen624373-4192899
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector