Factors influencing participation of reproductive-age patients in preconceptional screening: analysis of sociological survey data
- Authors: Talantova O.E.1, Postnikova T.B.1, Basipova A.A.1, Bespalova O.N.1, Glotov A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
- Issue: Vol 74, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 71-82
- Section: Original study articles
- Submitted: 01.11.2025
- Accepted: 14.11.2025
- Published: 25.12.2025
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/jowd/article/view/695663
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD695663
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QZOOGW
- ID: 695663
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hereditary monogenic diseases are a significant medical and social problem that burdens the healthcare system and affects thousands of families worldwide. Preconception screening is a key element in the primary prevention of these pathologies. Despite its proven clinical significance, public awareness about the benefits of pre-pregnancy training, including preconception screening, remains unsatisfactory. According to the World Health Organization data (2023), only 30–40% of couples planning a pregnancy undergo a comprehensive examination before conception.
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess patients’ knowledge about preconception screening options.
METHODS: This cross-sectional comprehensive study was conducted in the field of sociology of medicine, in which patients from St. Petersburg, Russia participated on a voluntary and anonymous basis. We developed a 24-question survey questionnaire that was administered online using a Google Form.
RESULTS: The study involved 209 respondents of different age groups. The questionnaire was asked to be filled out by both individual female patients at the reception and couples who attended the appointment together. The main factors contributing to the low appeal of women of reproductive age regarding preconception screening are a lack of awareness of the benefits of this type of pre-pregnancy training, the perception of preconception screening as an unnecessarily expensive diagnostic procedure, and organizational barriers, including the lack of specialized programs at the primary healthcare level.
CONCLUSION: To expand preconception screening coverage, it is advisable to raise patient awareness, train specialists in this field, and develop clinical guidelines, examination protocols, and algorithms for managing identified risk factors. The implementation of these measures will reduce the incidence of pregnancy complications, improve newborn health outcomes, and optimize healthcare costs. Further research should be aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of various preconception counseling models, depending on regional characteristics and sociodemographic groups.
Full Text
About the authors
Olga E. Talantova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Author for correspondence.
Email: olga_talantova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3520-599X
SPIN-code: 9845-1631
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTatiana B. Postnikova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: ptb20@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8227-2629
SPIN-code: 5354-4640
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Anastasia A. Basipova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: anamikhajlova@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5020-9561
SPIN-code: 2675-5857
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Olesya N. Bespalova
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: shiggerra@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6542-5953
SPIN-code: 4732-8089
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAndrey S. Glotov
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: anglotov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7465-4504
SPIN-code: 1406-0090
Dr. Sci. (Biology)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Borisova AO, Nesterov RS. Sociocultural aspects of preconceptional genetic testing. Medical Ethics. 2023;(3):14–21. doi: 10.24075/medet.2023.020 EDN: JRIRCJ
- Talantova OE, Postnikova TB, Mikhailova AA, et al. A modern view on preconception carrier screening. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2024;73(1):149–156. doi: 10.17816/JOWD623670 EDN: UKZJSQ
- Glotov AS, Nasikhova YuA, Dvoinova NM, et al. Prospects for preconceptional genetic screening at the pregnancy planning stage. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(6):173–192. doi: 10.17816/JOWD622752 EDN: KWZCRF
- Glotov AS. Ecological genetics and predictive medicine: 20 years later. New trends and old basis. Ecological Genetics. 2023;21(4):299–315. doi: 10.17816/ecogen623390 EDN: KUANZM
- Kudryavtseva EV, Lagutina OV, Kovalev VV, et al. Molecular genetic study of the SMN1 and SMN2 genes associated with spinal muscular atrophy in individuals with infertility aimed at in vitro fertilization. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023;17(6):707–717. doi: 10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.441 EDN: KCORQH
- Kudryavtseva EV, Deryabina SS, Kovalev VV, et al. Prospects of screening for carriers of hereditary diseases in pre-conception preparation programs. Russian Bulletin of the Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;24(1):31–40. doi: 10.17116/rosakush20242401131 EDN: AMGFUI
- Nasykhova YuA, Karpovich LA, Dvoinova NM, et al. Modern molecular genetic methods and approaches used in preconceptional genetic screening. Medical Genetics. 2023;22(12):20–32. doi: 10.25557/2073-7998.2023.12.20-32 EDN: AFZDME
- Grebenshchikova EG. Ethical problems of preconceptional genetic testing. Medical Genetics. 2025;24(4):4–11. doi: 10.25557/2073-7998.2025.04.4-11 EDN: RWRUZP
- Donnikov AE. Ethical issues related to preconceptional genetic screening: historical experience and current trends. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;(11):46–54. doi: 10.18565/aig.2019.11.46-54 EDN: FJXIGE
- Postnikova TB, Mikhailova AA, Bespalova ON, et al. Assessment of the current knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists about preconception screening. a sociological survey. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2024;73(6):151–161. doi: 10.17816/JOWD636829 EDN: TJPVRZ
- Komarov IA, Krasilnikova EYu, Alexandrova OYu, et al. Analysis of the prevalence of rare (orphan) diseases (“List of 24”) and the dynamics of detection of pediatric patients in the subjects of the Russian Federation. Medical Genetics. 2020;19(7):25–26. doi: 10.25557/2073-7998.2020.07.25-26 EDN: WJRYCE
- Vetrov VA. Sociohumanitarian issues of preconceptional genetic screening programs. Philosophical Thought. 2023;(10):124–137. doi: 10.25136/2409-8728.2023.10.44164 EDN: NISNCT
- Bogomyagkova ES, Orekh EA, Glukhova ME. Preconceptional genetic screening in Russians’ assessments. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2025;(6):129–142. doi: 10.31857/S0132162525050113 EDN: CCBUOL
- Revazyan KZ, Meshkov AN, Yershova AI, et al. Psychosocial, ethical, legal and economic aspects of genetic screening for the carriage of variants that cause the development of monogenic recessive diseases. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2021;24(2):102–108. doi: 10.17116/profmed202124021102 EDN: CNOXUZ
Supplementary files












