Hereditary optic neuropathies: autosomal dominant optic neuropathy with an OPA1 gene mutation and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy with a MT-ND4 gene mutation: case reports

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Hereditary optic neuropathies are a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders leading to degeneration of retinal ganglion cells and the optic nerve. This group includes two main forms: autosomal dominant optic neuropathy and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. The first one is caused by mutations in nuclear genes (such as OPA1). OPA1 mutations, which disrupt mitochondrial fusion, lead to their fragmentation and reduced energy production. This results in the death of retinal ganglion cells, which have high energy requirements. Their gradual death and degeneration of the optic nerve induce a gradual, symmetrical, and painless loss of vision starting in childhood (6–10 years). The incidence of the disorder is 1 in 35,000, with about 25% of patients maintaining high visual acuity. Leber hereditary optic neuropathy is a maternally inherited mitochondrial genetic disorder with a male predominance and an incidence of 1:27,000 to 1:45,000. The main cause of the disease is mitochondrial DNA mutations (m.3460G>A, m.11778G>A, and m.14484T>C), which disrupt the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The clinical presentation of this disorder is characterized by a subacute onset with rapid, painless bilateral loss of vision. There are asymptomatic, subacute (within 6 months of onset), dynamic (6–12 months), and chronic (greater than 12 months) disease stages. In recent years, recessive forms of hereditary optic neuropathy have been identified, associated with mutations in nuclear genes such as DNAJC30 and MCAT, which challenges the diagnosis. The presented article analyzes two clinical cases of autosomal dominant optic neuropathy and hereditary optic neuropathy. A comparative analysis of clinical and metabolic parameters, in particular blood lactate levels as a marker of mitochondrial dysfunction, revealed both differences and similarities between these disorders. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach, including a thorough clinical examination, molecular genetic testing, and assessment of the patient’s metabolic status. This comprehensive assessment is the key to early and accurate diagnosis, which enables personalized patient management and development of optimal treatment and rehabilitation strategies.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ekaterina A. Pidodniy

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution

Author for correspondence.
Email: kati-makulova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9945-3293
SPIN-code: 9230-8651

the Orenburg branch; MD

Russian Federation, Orenburg

Aleksandr D. Chuprov

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; Orenburg State University

Email: nauka@ofmntk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7011-4220

S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, the Orenburg branch; MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Orenburg; Orenburg

References

  1. Carelli V, Ross-Cisneros FN, Sadun AA. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of optic neuropathies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004;23(1):53–89. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2003.10.003
  2. Yu-Wai-Man P, Griffiths PG, Chinnery PF. Mitochondrial optic neuropathies—disease mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011;30(2):81–114. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.11.002.
  3. Carelli V, Karanjia R, La Morgia C. Editorial: hereditary optic neuropathies: a new perspective. Front Neurol. 2021;12:742484. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.742484
  4. Yu-Wai-Man P, Votruba M, Moore AT, Chinnery PF. Treatment strategies for inherited optic neuropathies: past, present and future. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(5):521–537. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.37
  5. Yu-Wai-Man P, Griffiths PG, Burke A, et al. The prevalence and natural history of dominant optic atrophy due to OPA1 mutations. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(8):1538–1546, 1546.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.038
  6. Han J, Li Y, You Y, et al. Autosomal dominant optic atrophy caused by six novel pathogenic OPA1 variants and genotype–phenotype correlation analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02546-0
  7. Caporali L, Magri S, Legati A, et al. ATPase domain AFG3L2 mutations alter OPA1 processing and cause optic neuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2020;88(1):18–32. doi: 10.1002/ana.25723
  8. Jurkute N, Leu C, Pogoda HM, et al. SSBP1 mutations in dominant optic atrophy with variable retinal degeneration. Ann Neurol. 2019;86(3):368–383. doi: 10.1002/ana.25550
  9. Yu-Wai-Man P, Shankar SP, Biousse V, et al. Genetic screening for OPA1 and OPA3 mutations in patients with suspected inherited optic neuropathies. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):558–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.029
  10. Khanakova NA, Sheremet NL, Loginova AN, et al. Hereditary optic neuropathies: clinical and molecular genetic characteristics. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2013;129(6):82–88. EDN: RSXHIB
  11. Chuprov AD, Pidodnii EA. Autosomal recessive Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (DNAJC30 mutation): case report. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2025;25(S):104–109. (In Russ). doi: 10.32364/2311-7729-2025-25-Suppl-15
  12. Yu-Wai-Man P, Chinnery PF. Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al editors. GeneReviews®. Seattle: University of Washington; 2000. P. 1993–2025.
  13. Gerber S, Orssaud C, Kaplan J, et al. MCAT mutations cause nuclear LHON-like optic neuropathy. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(4):521. doi: 10.3390/genes12040521
  14. Stenton SL, Sheremet NL, Catarino CB, et al. Impaired complex I repair causes recessive Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(6):e138267. doi: 10.1172/JCI138267
  15. Yu-Wai-Man P, Carelli V, Newman NJ, et al. Therapeutic benefit of idebenone in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: The LEROS nonrandomized controlled trial. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(3):101437. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101437
  16. Carelli V, Carbonelli M, de Coo IF, et al. International consensus statement on the clinical and therapeutic management of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol. 2017;37(4):371–381. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000570
  17. La Morgia C, Cascavilla ML, De Negri AM, et al. Recognizing Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy to avoid delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1466275. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1466275
  18. Chepur SV, Pluzhnikov NN, Chubar OV, et al. Lactic acid: dynamics of ideas about the lactate biology. Biology Bulletin Reviews. 2021;141(3): 227–247. doi: 10.31857/S0042132421030042 EDN: ROJMSR
  19. Chuprov AD, Pidodniy EA, Kazakova TV, Marshinskaya OV. Search for new laboratory methods for diagnostics of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Science of the young (Eruditio Juvenium). 2025;13(1):113–126. doi: 10.23888/HMJ2025131113-126 EDN: SITHAA
  20. Almind GJ, Ek J, Rosenberg T, et al. Dominant optic atrophy in Denmark—report of 15 novel mutations in OPA1, using a strategy with a detection rate of 90 %. BMC Med Genet. 2012;13:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-65
  21. Yu-Wai-Man P, Votruba M, Moore AT, Chinnery PF. Treatment strategies for inherited optic neuropathies: past, present and future. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(5):521–537. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.37.
  22. Hage R. Medical treatments in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022;45(8S1):S24-S31. (In French) doi: 10.1016/S0181-5512(22)00447-8
  23. Chen BS, Newman NJ. Clinical trials in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: outcomes and opportunities. Curr Opin Neurol. 2025;38(1):79–86. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001343
  24. Barboni P, Savini G, Feuer WJ, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness variability in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy carriers. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22(6):985–991. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000154
  25. Sheremet NL, Ronzina IA, Galoyan NS, Kazaryan EE. Up to date methods of optic nerve evaluation in patients with optic neuropathy of various etiology. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2011;127(2):15–18. EDN: NQUAYB

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Perimetry of patient S.: a, OS; b, OD.

Download (98KB)
3. Fig. 2. Computer perimetry of patient S.: a, OD; b, OS.

Download (303KB)
4. Fig. 3. Fundus images of patient S.: a, OD; b, OS.

Download (279KB)
5. Fig. 4. Optical coherence tomography of the optic disc and retinal ganglion cell layer of patient S.

Download (528KB)
6. Fig. 5. Electroretinography of patient S.: a, photopic negative response; b, pattern.

Download (249KB)
7. Fig. 6. Visual evoked potentials of patient S.: a, a flash; b, pattern.

Download (312KB)
8. Fig. 7. Perimetry of patient N.: a, OS; b, OD.

Download (114KB)
9. Fig. 8. Computer perimetry of patient N.: a, OD; b, OS.

Download (326KB)
10. Fig. 9. Fundus images of patient N.: a, OD; b, OS.

Download (151KB)
11. Fig. 10. Optical coherence tomography of the optic disk and retinal ganglion cell layer of patient N.: a, OD; b, OS.

Download (418KB)
12. Fig. 11. Visual evoked potentials of patient N.: a, a flash; b, pattern.

Download (396KB)
13. Fig. 12. Electroretinography of patient N.: a, photopic negative response; b, pattern.

Download (338KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-65574 от 04 мая 2016 г.