Ophthalmology ReportsOphthalmology ReportsОфтальмологические ведомости1998-71022412-5423Eco-Vector56799010.17816/OV567990Case reportsКлинические случаиResearch ArticleSurgical treatment of Ahmed glaucoma valve’s tube protrusion relapse. Clinical observationsХирургическое лечение рецидива протрузии трубки клапанного дренажа Ahmed. Клинические наблюденияhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4496-0703StarostinaAnna V.СтаростинаАнна Владимировна
Russian Federation

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

канд. мед. наук

anna.mntk@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-0325BurlakovKonstantin S.БурлаковКонстантин Сергеевич
Russian Federation
konstantin.burlakow@yandex.ruS. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionНациональный медицинский исследовательский центр «Межотраслевой научно-технический комплекс «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Фёдорова»1201202416491970308202314102023Copyright ©; 2024, Eco-VectorCopyright ©; 2024, Эко-ВекторCopyright ©; 2024,2024Eco-VectorЭко-Векторhttps://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07https://journals.eco-vector.com/ov/article/view/567990

In the practice of an ophthalmic surgeon, patients with a large number of concomitant conditions after repeated surgical interventions are seen with increasingly frequency. One of the grave complications in such patients is secondary glaucoma with a refractory type of course. After successful compensation of intraocular pressure in such patients, the risk of complications increases many times, for example, protrusion of the Ahmed valve drainage tube, which becomes the entrance gate for infection, which can lead to endophthalmitis. This article presents clinical cases of surgical treatment of recurrent protrusion of the Ahmed valve drainage tube.

В практике офтальмохирурга всё чаще встречаются пациенты с большим количеством коморбидной патологии после неоднократных хирургических вмешательств. Одно из грозных осложнений у таких пациентов — вторичная глаукома с рефрактерным типом течения. После успешной компенсации внутриглазного давления у таких пациентов многократно возрастает риск осложнений, например протрузия трубки клапанного дренажа Ahmed, которая становится входными воротами для инфекции, что может привести к эндофтальмиту. В данной статье представлены клинические случаи хирургического лечения рецидивов протрузии трубки клапанного дренажа Ahmed.

secondary glaucomaAhmed valvevalve drainage tube protrusionвторичная глаукомаклапан Ahmedпротрузия трубки клапанного дренажаThe study was funded by S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution.Исследование и публикация статьи финансируются из бюджета ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Фёдорова» Минздрава России.Kapelushnik N, Singer R, Barkana Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation without plate sutures: a 10-year retrospective study. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(6):502–507. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001813Kapelushnik N., Singer R., Barkana Y., et al. Surgical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation without plate sutures: a 10-year retrospective study // J Glaucoma. 2021. Vol. 30, No. 6. P. 502–507. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001813Arikan G, Gunenc U. Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation to reduce intraocular pressure: Updated perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1833–1845. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S342721Arikan G., Gunenc U. Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation to reduce intraocular pressure: Updated perspectives // Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. Vol. 17. P. 1833–1845. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S342721Patel S, Pasquale LR. Glaucoma drainage devices: a review of the past, present, and future. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010;25(5–6): 265–270. DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2010.518840Patel S., Pasquale L.R. Glaucoma drainage devices: a review of the past, present, and future // Semin Ophthalmol. 2010. Vol. 25, No. 5–6. P. 265–270. DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2010.518840Yazdani S, Mahboobipour H, Pakravan M, et al. Adjunctive Mitomycin C or amniotic membrane transplantation for Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: a randomized clinical trial. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(5):415–421. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000256Yazdani S., Mahboobipour H., Pakravan M., et al. Adjunctive Mitomycin C or amniotic membrane transplantation for Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: a randomized clinical trial // J Glaucoma. 2016. Vol. 25, No. 5. P. 415–421. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000256Bains U, Hoguet A. Aqueous drainage device erosion: a review of rates, risks, prevention, and repair. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(S1):1–10. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1353805Bains U., Hoguet A. Aqueous drainage device erosion: a review of rates, risks, prevention, and repair // Semin Ophthalmol. 2018. Vol. 33, No. S1. P. 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1353805Chaku M, Netland PA, Ishida K, Rhee DJ. Risk factors for tube exposure as a late complication of glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:547–553. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S104029Chaku M., Netland P.A., Ishida K., Rhee D.J. Risk factors for tube exposure as a late complication of glaucoma drainage implant surgery // Clin Ophthalmol. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 547–553. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S104029Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, et al. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(1):23–31. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)73755-9Coleman A.L., Hill R., Wilson M.R., et al. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant // Am J Ophthalmol. 1995. Vol. 120, No. 1. P. 23–31. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)73755-9Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Choplin N, et al. Follow-up of the original cohort with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(2):198–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00080-XTopouzis F., Coleman A.L., Choplin N., et al. Follow-up of the original cohort with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant // Am J Ophthalmol. 1999. Vol. 128, No. 2. P. 198–204. DOI: 10.1016/S0002–9394(99)00080-XYalvac IS, Eksioglu U, Satana B, Duman S. Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve and Molteno implant in neovascular glaucoma. Eye. 2007;21(1):65–70. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702125Yalvac I.S., Eksioglu U., Satana B., Duman S. Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve and Molteno implant in neovascular glaucoma // Eye. 2007. Vol. 21, No. 1. P. 65–70. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702125Pakravan M, Hatami M, Esfandiari H, et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: graft-free short tunnel small flap versus scleral patch graft after 1-year follow-up: a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1(3):206–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.10.008Pakravan M., Hatami M., Esfandiari H., et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: graft-free short tunnel small flap versus scleral patch graft after 1-year follow-up: a randomized clinical trial // Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018. Vol. 1, No. 3. P. 206–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.10.008Smith MF, Doyle JW, Ticrney JW Jr. A comparison of glaucoma drainage implant tube coverage. J Glaucoma. 2002;11(2):143–147. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200204000-00010Smith M.F., Doyle J.W., Ticrney J.W. Jr. A comparison of glaucoma drainage implant tube coverage // J Glaucoma. 2002. Vol. 11, No. 2. P. 143–147. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200204000-00010Wigton E, Swanner C, Joiner J, et al. Outcomes of shunt tube coverage with glycerol preserved cornea versus pericardium. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(4):258–261. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31826a96e8Wigton E., Swanner C., Joiner J., et al. Outcomes of shunt tube coverage with glycerol preserved cornea versus pericardium // J Glaucoma. 2014. Vol. 23, No. 4. P. 258–261. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31826a96e8Panda S, Khurana M, Vijaya L, et al. Comparison of conjunctiva-related complications between scleral and corneal patch grafts in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(3):881–887. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1846_22Panda S., Khurana M., Vijaya L., et al. Comparison of conjunctiva-related complications between scleral and corneal patch grafts in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation // Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023. Vol. 71, No. 3. P. 881–887. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1846_22