Features of measurement of intraocular pressure in children

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This review discusses the results of various studies conducted in recent years on the comparison of modern methods of measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in children: pneumotonometry, Maklakov applanation tonometry, and tonometry using Perkins tonometer, Goldmann tonometer, Icare tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, TonoPen handheld tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer TIOP01, or a dynamic contour Pascal tonometer. This study discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of measurement of IOP in children, including the evaluation of patients with fibrous lens capsules that might affect the measurement of IOP and an analysis of the characteristics of evaluation of IOP in children with congenital glaucoma.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Elina E. Tugeeva

Saint Petersburg State Medical Pediatric University

Author for correspondence.
Email: etugeeva@yandex.ru
research fellow Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Brzheskiy

Saint Petersburg State Medical Pediatric University

Email: vvbrzh@yandex.ru
PhD, professor, Head of Department ophthalmology and clinical pharmacology Russian Federation

References

  1. Аветисов С.Э., Бубнова И.А., Антонов А.А. Исследование биомеханических свойств роговицы у пациентов с нормотензивной и первичной открытоугольной глаукомой // Вестник офтальмологии. – 2008. – № 5. – С. 14–16. [Avetisov SE, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA. Study the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with normotensive and primary open angle glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2008;(5):14-16. (In Russ).]
  2. Астахов Ю.С., Джалиашвили О.А. Современные направления в изучении гемодинамики глаза при глаукоме // Офтальмологический журнал. – 1990. – № 3. – С. 179. [Аstakhov YS, Dzhaliashvily OA. Modern directions in the study of hemodynamics of the eye in glaucoma. Oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal 1990;(3):179-183. (In Russ).]
  3. Астахов Ю.С., Тимофеев А.А., Черезов Н.К., и др. Метод ядерного резонанса в исследовании пульсации глазного яблока // Вестник офтальмологии. – 1984. – № 5. – С. 54–57. [Аstakhov YS, Timofeev AA, Cherezov NK, et al. Nuclear gamma-resistance technique in the study of eyeball pulse. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1984;(5):54-57. (In Russ).]
  4. Астахов Ю.С., Потёмкин В.В. Толщина и биомеханические свойства роговицы: как их измерить и какие факторы на них влияют // Офтальмологические ведомости. – 2008. – Т. 1. – № 4. – С. 36–43. [Astakhov YS, Potemkin VV. The thickness and biomechanical properties of the cornea: how to measure it and what factors affect them. Ophthalmology Journal. 2008;1(4):36-43. (In Russ).]
  5. Бондарь Н.О. Показатели внутриглазного давления новорождёенного ребенка, обусловленные морфологическими особенностями дренажной системы глаза в разные сроки гестации: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. – М., 2009. [Bondar’ NO. Indicators of a newborn baby in intraocular pressure caused by the morphological features of the drainage system of the eye at different periods of gestation. [dissertation] Moscow; 2009. (In Russ).]
  6. Борцов В.Н., Астахов Ю.С. О взаимосвязи внутриглазного, интрасклерального венозного и системного артериального давления (экспериментальное исследование) // Вестник офтальмологии. – 1974. – № 6. – С. 9. [Bortsov VN, Аstakhov YS. On interrelation of intraocular, intrascleral venous and systemic arterial pressure (experimental investigation). Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1974;(6):9-12. (In Russ).]
  7. Костова С., Ангелов Б., Петкова Н. Сравнительное исследование внутриглазного давления при первичной открытоугольной глаукоме, измеренного с помощью контурного динамического тонометра PASCAL, аппланационного тонометра GOLDMANN и аппланационного тонометра Маклакова // Клиническая офтальмология. – 2009. – Т. 10. – № 4. – С. 123–125. [Kostova S, Angelov B, Petkova N. A comparative study of intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma, measured by dynamic contour tonometer PASCAL, GOLDMANN applanation tonometry and Maklakov applanation tonometry. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2009;10(4):123-–125. (In Russ).]
  8. Нероев В.В., Ханджян А.Т., Зайцева О.В. Новые возможности в оценке биомеханических свойств роговицы и измерении внутриглазного давления // Глаукома. – 2006. – № 1. – С. 51–56. [Neroev VV, Khandzhyan AT, Zaytseva OV. New possibilities in the assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea and the measurement of intraocular pressure. Glaukoma. 2006;(1):51-56. (In Russ).]
  9. Нестеров А.П., Бондарь Н.О., Сидоренко Е.И. Внутриглазное давление новорождённого ребёнка // Российская педиатрическая офтальмология. – 2009. – № 1. – С. 18–20. [Nesterov AP, Bondar’ NO, Sidorenko EI. Intraocular pressure of a newborn baby. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2009;(1):18-20. (In Russ).]
  10. Романенко И.А., Егоров Е.А., Куроедов А.В., и др. Диагностическая значимость тонометра i-care в исследовании уровня внутриглазного давления: Сборник научных статей VII Международной конференции «Глаукома: теории, тенденции, технологии». – М., 2009. – С. 525–531. [Romanenko IA, Egorov EA, Kuroedov AV. The diagnostic value of the study icare tonometer intraocular pressure level. Sbornik nauchnykh statey VII Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii Glaukoma: teorii, tendentsii, tekhnologii. Moscow; 2009:525-531. (In Russ).]
  11. Сидоренко Е.И., Бондарь Н.О. Проблемы тонометрии в неонатальной офтальмологии // Российская педиатрическая офтальмология. – 2009. – № 2. – С. 46–49. [Sidorenko EI, Bondar’ NO. Problems of tonometry in neonatal ophthalmology. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2009;(2):46-49. (In Russ).]
  12. Тугеева Э.Э., Воронцова Т.Н., Бржеский В.В., Зайцева М.В. Влияние основных параметров фиброзной капсулы на результаты различных способов тонометрии у детей // Российская педиатрическая офтальмология. – 2015. – Т. 10. – № 2. – С. 38–40. [Tugeeva EE, Vorontsova TN, Brzheskiy VV, Zaytseva MV. Influence of the basic parameters of the fibrous capsule of the results of different methods of tonometry in children. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2015;10(2):38-40. (In Russ).]
  13. Amini H, Fakhraie G, Abolmaali S, et al. Central corneal thickness in Iranian congenital glaucoma patients. Middle East African J of Ophthalmology. 2012;19(2):194-198. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.95248.
  14. Bradfield YS, Melia BM, Repka MX, et al. Central corneal thickness in children. Archive of Ophthalmology. 2011;129 (9):1132-1138. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.225.
  15. Bradfield YS, Kaminski BM, Repka MX, et al. Comparison of Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometers for measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy children. J Am Association for Pediatric Ophthalmol and Strabismus. 2012;16(3):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.12.150.
  16. Brandt JD, Casuso LA, Budenz DL. Markedly increased central thickness: an unrecognized finding in congenital aniridia. Am J of Ophthalmology. 2004;137(2):348-350. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.038.
  17. Borrego Sanz L, Morales L, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, et al. The Icare-Pro rebound tonometer versus the hand-held applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016; 25(2):149-154. doi: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000000177.
  18. Bueno-Gimeno J, Espana-Gregori E, Gene-Sampedro A, et al. Relationship among corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(5):507-513. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000231.
  19. Chan WH, Lloyd IC, Ashworth JL, et al. Measurement of intraocular pressure in children in the UK. Eye (Lond). 2012;25(1):119-120.
  20. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(1):80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.061.
  21. Dalhmann-Noor AH, Puertas R, Tabasa-Lim S, et al. Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldman applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study. BMJ.2013;3(4):1247-1255.
  22. Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, et al. Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2006;29(10):1119-1127. doi: 10.1016/S0181-5512(06)73907-9.
  23. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry and direct intracameral IOP reddings. Br J of Ophthalmology. 2001;85(1):85-87. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.1.85.
  24. Flemmons MS, Hsiao YC, Dzau J, et al. Icare rebound tontmetry in children with know and suspect glaucoma. J Am Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.2011;15(2):153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.11.022.
  25. Fung DS, Roensch MA, Kooner KS, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of childhood glaucoma: results from the Dallas Glaucoma Registry. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1739-1746. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S45480.
  26. Gatzioufas Z, Labiris G, Stachs O, et al. Biomechanical profile of the cornea in primary congenital glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02519.x.
  27. Guigou S, Coste R, Denis D. Central corneal thickness and endothelial cell density in congenital glaucoma. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2008;31(5):509-514. doi: 10.1016/S0181-5512(08)72468-9.
  28. Hussein MA, Paysse EA, Bell NP, et al. Corneal thickness in children. Am J of Ophthalmology. 2004;138(5):744-747. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.030.
  29. Jiang WJ, Wu JF, Hu YY, et al. Intraocular pressure and associated factors in children: the Shandong children eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(7):4128-4134. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14244.
  30. Jordao ML, Costa VP, Rodrigues M de L, Paula JS. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and GoldmannApplanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(1):117-121. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2027-3.
  31. Kageyama M, Hirooka K, Baba T, Shiraga F. Comparison of Care rebound tonometer with noncontact tonometer in healthy children. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(1):63-66. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181d12dc4.
  32. Krzyzanowska-Berkowska P, Asejczyk-Widlicka M, Pierscionek B. Intraocular pressure in a cohort of healthy easten European schoolchildren: variations in method and corneal thickness. BMC Ophthalmology. 2012;12(61):280-289.
  33. Lanza M, Iaccarino S, Cennamo M, et al. Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;22:140-144.
  34. Li Y, Tang L, Xiao M, et al. Comparison of the Icare tonometer and the hand-held Goldmannapplanation tonometer in pediatric aphakia. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):550-554. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31825afc87.
  35. Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, Fong A, et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(9):3852-3857. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1670.
  36. Lopes JE, Wilson RR, Alvim HS, et al. Central corneal thickness in pediatric glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2007;44(2):112-117.
  37. Lundvaal A, Svedberg H, Chen E. Application of the iCare rebound tonometer in healthy infants. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(1):7-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181d1d1ef.
  38. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Saenz-Frances F, et al. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(1):49-52. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31816f760c.
  39. Meire FM, Delleman IW. Biometry in X-linked megalocornea: pathognomonic findings. Br J of Ophthalmology. 1994;78:781-785. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.10.781.
  40. Mendes MH, Sakata L, Betinjane AJ. Central corneal thickness and its correlations with other ocular biometric data in patients with congenital glaucoma. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74(2):85-87. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27492011000200002.
  41. Mendes MH, Betinjane AJ, Quiroga VA. Correlation between different tonometries and ocular biometric parameters in patients with primary congenital glaucoma. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013;76(6):354-356. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27492013000600007.
  42. Muir KW, Jin J, Freedman SF. Central corneal thickness and its relationship to intraocular pressure in children. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(12):2220-2223. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.020.
  43. Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, et al. Agreement of reboundtonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanationtonometers. Am J of Ophthalmology. 2006;142(2):332-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035.
  44. Oberacher-Velten I, Prasser C, Lorenz B. Evolution of central corneal thickness in children with congenital glaucoma requiring glaucoma surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2008;246(3):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0690-6.
  45. Pakrou N, Gray T, Mils R, et al. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(1):43-47. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318133fb32.
  46. Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nichoas S, et al. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37(7):687-691. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02109.x.
  47. Razeghinejad MR, Salouti R, Khalili MR. Intraocular pressure measurements by three different tonometers in children with aphakic glaucoma and a thick cornea. Iran J Med Sci. 2014;39(1):11-19.
  48. Remon L, Cristobal JA, Castillo J. Central corneal thickness in full-term newborns by ultrasonic pachymetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(11):3080-3083.
  49. Rosentreter A, Schild AM, Lappas A, et al. Rebound tonometry and applanation tonometry during narcosis investigation of pediatric glaucoma. Der Ophthalmologe. 2011;108(4):331-336. doi: 10.1007/s00347-010-2286-5.
  50. Rushood AA, Zahrani MH, Khamis A, Rushood AA. Central corneal thickness in full-term Saudi newborns. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(5):355-358. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02412.x.
  51. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(5):257-262. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2006.09.006.
  52. Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, Yildirim N. Reproducibility and tolerability of the Icare rebound tonometer in school children. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(2):185-188. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31802fc6bc.
  53. Sahin A, Basmak H, Yildirim N. The influence of central corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured by Tono-pen and rebound tonometer in children. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(1):57-61. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31806ab33e.
  54. Tai TY, Mills MD, Beck AD, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal diameter in patients with childhood glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(6):524-528. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212293.93292.c9.
  55. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, El Sheikh A, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmannapplanation tonometry. Br J of Ophthalmology. 2005;89(7):851-854. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056622.
  56. Whitson JT, Liang C, Godfrey DG, et al. Central corneal thickness in patients with congenital aniridia. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(5):221-224. doi: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000152487.16012.40.
  57. Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Barequet IS. Central corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma. Cornea. 2006;25(8):923-925. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000225712.62511.1c.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2016 Tugeeva E.E., Brzheskiy V.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-65574 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies