<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Российский медико-биологический вестник имени академика И.П. Павлова</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0204-3475</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2500-2546</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4741</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/PAVLOVJ2014468-73</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Patient evaluation of general practitioners as a tool to improve the quality of primary health care</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Оценка пациентами врачей общей практики как инструмент повышения качества первичной медико-санитарной помощи</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO4 (2014)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№4 (2014)</issue-title><fpage>68</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-10-28"><day>28</day><month>10</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2014, Odrinskiy V.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2014, Одринский В.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Odrinskiy V.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Одринский В.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/pavlovj/article/view/4741">https://journals.eco-vector.com/pavlovj/article/view/4741</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The analysis of patient satisfaction (n = 424) of the work of general practitioners and health care institutions at the primary health care level with the use of standardized EUROPEP questionnaires was carried out in Ukraine. The results show lower evaluation by patients of Ukrainian doctors activity and primary healthcare institutions on comparison with European data. For improve this situation need to implement organizational and educational activities.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Проведен анализ удовлетворенности пациентов (n=424) работой врачей общей практики и учреждений здравоохранения на уровне первичной медико-санитарной помощи с использованием стандартизированного опросника EUROPEP. Установлены более низкие оценки пациентами деятельности украинских врачей и учреждений первичного уровня в сравнении с европейскими данными, что указывает на необходимость внедрения организационных и учебных мероприятий для улучшения ситуации.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>EUROPEP</kwd><kwd>primary health care</kwd><kwd>general practitioner</kwd><kwd>patient satisfaction</kwd><kwd>EUROPEP</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>первичная медико-санитарная помощь</kwd><kwd>врач общей практики</kwd><kwd>удовлетворенность пациентов</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain / M. Wensing [et al.] // Social science &amp; medicine. - 1998. - Vol. 47, № 10. - P. 1573-1588.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Active listening: more than just paying attention / K. Robertson [et al.] // Australian family physician. - 2005. - Vol. 34, № 12. - P. 1053.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods / R.G. Evans [et al.] // Family Practice. - 2007. - Vol. 24, № 2. - P. 117-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Baker R. Measuring patient satisfaction: a test of construct validity / R. Baker, M. Whitfield // Qual Health Care. - 1992. -№ 1. - P. 104-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Coulehan J.L. The Medical Interview: Mastering Skills For Clinical Practice (Medical Interview) / John L. Coulehan, Marian R. Bloc // - 2005. - FA Davis Company. - P. 409.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Does a patient survey make a difference? / M. Greco [et al.] // Education for Primary Care. - 2004. - Vol. 15, № 2. -P. 183-189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Grol R. Patients Evaluate General/Family Practice: the EUROPEP Instrument / R. Grol, M. Wensing // EQuiP: the Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care / Centre for Quality Care Research. - Nijmegen, 2000. - P. 94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>How many patients are needed to provide reliable evaluations of individual clinicians? / E. Nelson [et al.] // Med Care. - 2004. - Vol. 42. - P. 259-266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Is the job satisfaction of primary care team members associated with patient satisfaction? / J. Szecsenyi [et al.] // BMJ quality &amp; safety. - 2011. - Vol. 20, № 6. - P. 508-514.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>McAvoy P. Assessing the competence of practicing physicians in New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom: progress and problems / P. McAvoy // Fam Med. - 2004. - Vol. 36, № 3. - P. 172-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Mead N. The general practice assessment questionnaire (GPAQ)-development and psychometric characteristics / N. Mead, P. Bower, M. Roland // BMC family practice. - 2008. - Vol. 9, № 1. - P. 13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Patient evaluations of accessibility and coordination in general practice in Europe / M. Wensing [et al.] // Health expectations. - 2008. - Vol. 11, № 4. -P. 384-390.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>The Norwegian EUROPEP questionnaire for patient evaluation of general practice: data quality, reliability and construct validity / A. Bjertnæs [et al.] // Fam Pract. - 2011. - Vol. 28. - P. 342-349.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Vedsted P. Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice / P. Vedsted, I. Sokolowski, H.N. Heje // Scandinavian journal of primary health care. - 2008. -Vol. 26, № 3. - P. 174-180.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Wensing M. Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement? / M. Wensing, E. Vingerhoets, R. Grol // Patient education and counseling. - 2003. - Vol. 51, № 2. - P. 149-153.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
