<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Российский медико-биологический вестник имени академика И.П. Павлова</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0204-3475</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2500-2546</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">7000</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23888/PAVLOVJ20172247-262</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">MIGRATION OF THE INTRAUTERINE DEVICE TO THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>МИГРАЦИЯ ВНУТРИМАТОЧНОЙ СПИРАЛИ В СВОБОДНУЮ БРЮШНУЮ ПОЛОСТЬ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-07-25" publication-format="electronic"><day>25</day><month>07</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>247</fpage><lpage>262</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2017-09-24"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2017</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2017-09-24"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2017, Rahmonov D.A., Rashidov F.S., Kalmykov E.L., Marizoeva M.M., Bobdjonova O.B., Bokiyev F.B., Amonov S.S., Sadriev O.N.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2017, Рахмонов Д.А., Рашидов Ф.Ш., Калмыков Е.Л., Маризоева М.М., Бобджонова О.Б., Бокиев Ф.Б., Амонов Ш.Ш., Садриев О.Н.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Rahmonov D.A., Rashidov F.S., Kalmykov E.L., Marizoeva M.M., Bobdjonova O.B., Bokiyev F.B., Amonov S.S., Sadriev O.N.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Рахмонов Д.А., Рашидов Ф.Ш., Калмыков Е.Л., Маризоева М.М., Бобджонова О.Б., Бокиев Ф.Б., Амонов Ш.Ш., Садриев О.Н.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/pavlovj/article/view/7000">https://journals.eco-vector.com/pavlovj/article/view/7000</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>The aim:</bold> demonstration of our experience of surgical treatment of patients with migrated intrauterine device (IUD) into the abdominal cavity.</p> <p>The results of surgical treatment of migrated IUDs in the pelvic cavity are summarized in 17 women. The average age of the patients was 33,2±3,4 years. The timing of implantation of the IUDs varied from 10 days to 24 months. In all cases, the intra operational finding was T-shaped a copper device.</p> <p>The reason behind the women's consultation was an increase in pain syndrome in the lesser pelvis (n=15), dysuric phenomenon (n=1) and the onset of pregnancy (n=1). Perforation of the uterus and migration of the spiral occurred from 10 days to 2 years after its implantation. All patients were operated laparoscopicaly.</p> <p>The average duration of operations was 45,5±10,5 minutes. In the postoperative period there were no complications from the pelvic organs and postoperative wounds. The period of hospitalization of patients was 3,5±0,7 days. In all cases there was a regression of clinical signs and recovery. In one pregnant patient (gestation period 5-6 weeks) the pregnancy proceeded without particular pathological abnormalities and resulted in the birth of a full-term child.</p> <p>Laparoscopic removal of the IUD migrating from the uterine cavity to the abdominal cavity is the method of choice in the treatment of this group of patients, avoiding development of intra- and postoperative complications and a shorter length of stay in the hospital. The effectiveness of the procedure reaches 100%. The most common cause of complication of the IUD is the perforation of the uterus during its implantation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Цель</bold>: демонстрация собственного опыта хирургического лечения пациенток с мигрировавшими внутриматочными спиралями (ВМС) в брюшную полость.</p> <p>Обобщены результаты хирургического лечения мигрировавших ВМС в полость малого таза у 17 женщин. Средний возраст пациенток составил 33,2±3,4 лет. Сроки имплантации ВМС варьировали от 10 дней до 24 месяцев. Во всех случаях операционной находкой явилась медная Т-образная спираль.</p> <p>Поводом для обращения в женскую консультацию явилось усиление болевого синдрома в малом тазу (n=15), дизурические явление (n=1) и наступление беременности (n=1). Перфорация матки и миграция спирали наступила от 10 дней до 2 лет после ее имплантации. Все пациентки оперированы лапароскопическим способом. Средняя продолжительность операций составила 45,5±10,5 минут. В послеоперационном периоде осложнений со стороны органов малого таза и послеоперационных ран не отмечалось. Сроки госпитализации больных составили 3,5±0,7 суток. Во всех случаях отмечались регресс клинических признаков и выздоровление. У одной беременной пациентки (срок беременности 5-6 недель) беременность протекала без особых патологических отклонений и закончилась рождением доношенного ребенка.</p> <p>Лапароскопическое удаление мигрировавших из полости матки ВМС в брюшную полость является методом выбора в лечении данной группы пациенток позволяя избежать развития интра- и послеоперационных осложнений и сократить длительность пребывания в стационаре. Эффективность процедуры достигает 100%. Наиболее частой причиной данного осложнения ВМС считаем перфорацию матки во время ее имплантации.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>внутриматочная спираль</kwd><kwd>миграция</kwd><kwd>перфорация</kwd><kwd>органы малого таза</kwd><kwd>беременность</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1.	United Nations, Population Division, Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs. World Contraceptive Use 2007. New York, NY, USA; 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2.	Adiyeke M, Sanci M, Karaca i, Gokgu M, Toz E, Ocal E. Surgical management of intrauterine devices migrated towards intra-abdominal structures: 20-year experience of a tertiary center. Clin Exp Ob- stet Gynecol. 2015; 42 (3): 358-360. doi: 10.12891/ceog1840.2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3.	Kimberly A Kho, Dina J. Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes. Chamsy Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2014; 21: 596-601.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4.	Arslan A, Kanat-Pektas M, Yesi- lyurt H, Bilge U. Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009; 279 (3): 395-397.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5.	Ertopcu K, Nayki C, Ulug P, Nayki U, Gultekin E, Donmez A et al. Surgical removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine devices at one center in a 20-year period. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 128 (1): 10-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.025.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6.	Soydinc HE, Evsen Ms, Caga F, Sak ME, Taner MZ, Sak S. Translocated intrauterine contraceptive device: experiences of two medical centers with risk factors and the need for surgical treatment. J Reprod Med. 2013; 58 (5-6): 234-240.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7.	Ganer H, Levy A, Ohel I, Sheiner E. Pregnancy outcome in women with an intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201 (4): 381. e1-381.e5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8.	Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Piya- Anant M. Outcome of pregnancy in the presence of intrauterine device. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977; 56 (5): 479-482.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9.	Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices: report from a Swedish survey. Contraception. 1998; 57 (4): 251-255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10.	Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003; 8 (3): 150-155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11.	Long-term reversible contraception: twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. Contraception. 1997; 56 (6): 341-352.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12.	World Health Organization. WHO mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1987. P. 48-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13.	Cetinkaya K, Kumtepe Y, Ingec M. Minimally invasive approach to cases of lost intra-uterine device: a 7-year experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 159 (1): 119-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14.	Le A, Shan L, Xiao T, Zhuo R, Wang Z. Removal of an incarcerated intrauterine device in the sigmoid colon under the assistance of hysteroscope and laparoscope: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 42 (4): 531-534.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>15.	Madden A, Aslam A, Nusrat NB. A Case of Migrating «Saf-T-Coil» Presenting with a Vesicovaginal Fistula and Vesicovaginal Calculus. Urol Case Rep. 2016; 23 (7): 17-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2016.03.014.e Collection 2016.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
