Сomparative study of computer-assistance ortho-suv external fixation and conventional hybrid external fixation in adolescent with genu recurvatum

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

The aim of the study: to compare the results with the use of computer-assisted Ortho-SUV ExFix and conventional hybrid external fixator.

Materials and methods.

A retrospective analysis of examination and treatment of 13 patients aged 13 to 17 years with genu recurvatum of different etiology in combination with crus shortening. Ortho-SUV Frame was used in 5 patient, conventional hybrid external fixation was used in 5 patients.

Results.

Average time correction of deformity using Ortho-SUV ExFix (group A) was 23 ± 3,8 days, and using hybrid external fixator - 31 ± 4,5 days (group B). Fixation index (FI) for group A was 49,8 days/cm and 72,7 days/cm for group B. Posterior proximal tibia angle (aPPTA) reference value is 81° (77-84°). aPPTA after the final correction was 81,8 ± 1,6° for group A and 85,2 ± 4,1° for group B.

Conclusions.

Ortho-SUV frame allow for correction time reduction of 8 days and FI decrease of 22,9 days/cm. Genu recurvatum correction accuracy by Ortho-SUV frame is superior to the correction accuracy when using a hybrid wire-rod device.

About the authors

Edgar Valentinovich Bukharev

The Turner Institute for Children’s Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg

Author for correspondence.
Email: edgar.bukharev@gmail.com
MD, PhD, research associate of the department of bone pathology. The Turner Scientific and Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics. Russian Federation

Aleksander Pavlovich Pozdeev

The Turner Institute for Children’s Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg

Email: edgar.bukharev@gmail.com
MD, PhD, professor, chief research associate of the department of bone pathology. The Turner Scientific and Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics Russian Federation

Timur Faizovich Zubairov

The Turner Institute for Children’s Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg

Email: edgar.bukharev@gmail.com
MD, PhD, research associate of the department of bone pathology. The Turner Scientific and Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics Russian Federation

References

  1. Bellicini C, Khoury JG. Correction of genu recurvatum secondary to Osgood-Schlatter disease: a case report. Iowa Orthop J. 2006;26:130-3.
  2. Olerud C, Danckwardt-Lillieström G, Olerud S. Genu recurvatum caused by partial growth arrest of the proximal tibial physis: simultaneous correction and lengthening with physeal distraction. A report of two cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1986;106(1):64-8.
  3. Pappas AM, Anas P, Toczylowski HM Jr. Asymmetrical arrest of the proximal tibial physis and genu recurvatum deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):575-81.
  4. Bowler JR, Mubarak SJ, Wenger DR. Tibial physeal closure and genu recurvatum after femoral fracture: occurrence without a tibial traction pin. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10(5):653-7.
  5. Domzalski M, Mackenzie W. Growth arrest of the proximal tibial physis with recurvatum and valgus deformity of the knee. Knee. 2009;16(5):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.008.
  6. Laurà G, Berruto M, Bianchi M. Genu recurvatum following distal epiphysiodesis of the femur: X-ray evaluation and therapeutical approach. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1992;18(4):505-14.
  7. Nathan ST, Parikh SN. Genu recurvatum after tibial tuberosity fracture. Case Rep Orthop. 2013;952978. doi: 10.1155/2013/952978.
  8. Pennig D, Baranowski D. Genu recurvatum due to partial growth arrest of the proximal tibial physis: correction by callus distraction. Case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(2):119-21.
  9. Richards SW, Haddad FS, Hill RA. Case report. Post-traumatic tibial recurvatum: resolution with growth. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80(6):419-21.
  10. Beslikas T, Christodoulou A, Chytas A, et al. Genu Recurvatum Deformity in a Child due to Salter Harris Type V Fracture of the Proximal Tibial Physis Treated with High Tibial Dome Osteotomy. Case Rep Orthop. 2012;219231. doi: 10.1155/2012/219231.
  11. Bowen JR, Morley DC, McInerny V, MacEwen GD. Treatment of genu recurvatum by proximal tibial closing-wedge/anterior displacement osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(179):194-9.
  12. Chen LC, Chan YS, Wang CJ. Opening-wedge osteotomy, allografting with dual buttress plate fixation for severe genu recurvatum caused by partial growth arrest of the proximal tibial physis: a case report. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(6):384-7.
  13. Choi IH, Chung CY, Cho TJ, Park SS. Correction of genu recurvatum by the Ilizarov method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(5):769-74.
  14. Lecuire F, Lerat JL, Bousquet G, Dejour H, Trillat A. The treatment of genu recurvatum (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1980;66(2):95-103.
  15. Manohar Babu KV, Fassier F, Rendon JS, Saran N, Hamdy RC. Correction of proximal tibial recurvatum using the Ilizarov technique. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(1):35-41.
  16. Соломин Л.Н., Щепкина Е.А., Кулеш П.Н., и др. Определение референтных линий и углов длинных трубчатых костей: пособие для врачей. – СПб., 2010. - 48 с. [Solomin LN, Shchepkina EA, Kulesh PN, et al. Opredeleniye referentnykh liniy i uglov dlinnykh trubchatykh kostey: posobiye dlya vrachey. Saint-Petersburg, 2010. 48 p. (In Russ).]
  17. Соломин Л.Н., Виленский В.А. Практическая классификация деформаций длинных трубчатых костей. // Травматология и ортопедия России (приложение). – 2008. – № 3. - С. 44. [Solomin LN, Vilensky VA. Practical сlassification of long bone deformities. Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia (supplement). 2008;(3):44. (In Russ).]
  18. Соломин Л.Н., Щепкина Е.А., Виленский В.А., и др. Коррекция деформаций бедренной кости по Илизарову и основанным на компьютерной навигации аппаратом «Орто-СУВ». // Травматология и ортопедия России. – 2011. – № 3. - С. 32-39. [Solomin LN, Shchepkina EA, Vilensky VA, et al. Correction of femur deformities by Ilizarov method and by apparatus “Ortho-SUV” based on computer navigation. Travmatologiya i ortopediy Rossii. 2011;(3):32-39. (In Russ).]
  19. Manner HM, Huebl M, Radler C, et al. Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator. J Child Orthop. 2007;1(1):55-61. doi: 10.1007/s11832-006-0005-1.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Bukharev E.V., Pozdeev A.P., Zubairov T.F.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies