Selected aspects of the epidemiology of tumors and tumor-like diseases of the spine and spinal cord in children: A 19-year regional cohort study in the Leningrad region

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

Background. Statistical analysis of spinal tumors in children is difficult because of its rarity and different morphology. Benign tumor and tumor-like processes are not included in modern oncology literature even though intracanal tumors have the most severe prognosis and influence on a patient’s quality of life.

Aim. To evaluate the incidence, epidemiological structure (anatomical, sex, morphological structure), clinical characteristics, and survival of pediatric patients with tumors and tumor-like diseases of the spine and spinal cord in a single region of Russia.

Materials and methods. The data of 110 children with tumors and tumor-like diseases of the spine and spinal cord from the Leningrad region who received surgical treatment in Leningrad regional children's hospitals between 1998 and 2016 were included in the study. The authors evaluated the incidence, mortality, and survival rates adjusted for age, sex, morphology, and primary site of growth.

Results. The average annual morbidities of pediatric spinal tumors (including the spine and spinal canal) in the Leningradsaya oblast region from 1998 to 2016 were 1.93 per 100 000 pediatric patients and 0.3 per 100 000 for neuro-epithelial tumors of the spinal cord. The mortality rate was 0.2 per 100 000 pediatric patients. Spinal cord tumors of the cranio-vertebral and cervical zones as intramedullary low-malignant and extramedullary malignant metastatic spinal tumors had a negative effect on survival.

Conclusions. The Leningrad regional data were generally comparable with the cancer registry data of other countries. The data suggest that pediatric spinal cord patients should be treated in regional neurosurgical pediatric clinics.

Full Text

Introduction

Spine and spinal cord tumors in pediatric patients are rare, and there are few comprehensive publications on the pathology. A set of clinically reliable material on this topic will probably require many years to accumulate. The first distinctive feature of this pathology in pediatric patients is the absolute prevalence of primary spinal tumors, which is in contrast to the predominance of secondary (metastatic) tumors (>95%) in adults. The second feature of these tumors in children is their polymorphism, which hinders collection and generalization of the material because of the diversity of tumor characteristics. The third feature is the present ability to estimate the incidence of malignant tumors of pediatric patients from data collected in cancer registries and the proactive contributions of children’s oncologists. However, low-grade tumors, benign tumors, and tumor-like neoplasms are not subject to such strict consideration, despite the fact that intracanal tumors are one of the most severe clinical types. The timeliness of diagnosis, the capabilities of the technical equipment of a medical institution, and the qualification of the doctors are the main factors influencing the survival and quality of life of pediatric patients with spine and spinal cord tumors [1–9].

Thus, the aim of this study, which was conducted within the fairly large Leningrad Region, was to comprehensively evaluate the problem of tumors in childhood by analyzing the disease epidemiology, clinical and neurological symptoms, histological structure, localization of tumors and tumor-like formations of the spinal canal as well as factors associated with patient survival.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study. We examined the medical documentation (medical records, surgical records, morphologists’ conclusions) as well as data on the catamnesis of 110 children who were residents of the Leningrad Region and had undergone surgery for tumors and tumor-like diseases of the spine and spinal canal in the Leningrad Regional State Budget Health Institution Children’s Clinical Hospital. The patients ranged in age from 20 days to 18 years (inclusive) who were treated during the period from 1998 to 2016. For statistical data processing, the open software environment R was used.

Results and discussion

The system of organization of neurosurgical care for children in the Leningrad Region enables maintaining records and monitoring of all patients with tumors and tumor-like diseases of the spine and spinal canal in the Leningrad Children’s Regional Hospital. For 19 years, we monitored 110 pediatric patients who underwent 114 surgical interventions for neoplasms of the spine and spinal canal, with the number of interventions ranging from 1 to 12 per year (Fig. 1).

 

Fig. 1. Dynamics of the number of surgical interventions performed in the "DKB" LOGO in children with tumors and tumor-like diseases in 1998-2016.

 

The average incidence of children <18 years old with spinal neoplasms in the Leningrad Region during the study period was 1.93 per 100,000 children per year, including 0.3 per 100,000 of primary intracerebral (neuroepithelial) tumors and 0.75 per 100,000 children per year of malignant tumors of the spinal canal and spinal  cord.

When comparing the incidence rate of pediatric patients with primary intracerebral tumors of the spinal cord with the rates of these patients in similar regional (St. Petersburg) and foreign (Germany, USA) countries, both their similarities and differences of the pathology according to age are striking (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Incidences of spinal cord tumors in pediatric patients

Region

Incidence per  100,000 children

Age category (years)

Data source

Comments

Leningrad Region (1998–2016)

0.3

0–18 inclusive

Author’s research

Neuroepithelial tumors:

Low-grade astrocytoma — 10 Low-grade ependymoma — 3

USA

0.26

0–19

Central registry of brain tumors (cBTRuS)

Neuroepithelial tumors

Germany

0.26

0–15

German Cancer Register (GccR)

Neuroepithelial tumors

St. Petersburg (1989–1999)

0.15

0–14

Thesis of M.D. Vladovskaya

Benign and malignant intramedullary tumors  (except mts and tumors that have spread from neighboring locations)

 

The age distribution of patients requiring surgical treatment shows significant increase of tumors in children aged <5 years (41%) and similar rates in subsequent 5-year periods (Fig. 2).

 

Fig. 2. Age distribution of the patients who underwent surgery

 

The overall sex distribution of patients (Table 2) was relatively uniform, but among children <1 year, 5–9 years, and 15–18 years, boys predominated, whereas in the 1–4-year age group, girls predominated. However, the sex composition of different age groups of the Leningrad Region population was not evaluated, which meant that we were unable to reliably determine the age and sex structure of the pathology.

 

Table 2. Distribution of patients according to age and sex

Age groups

Boys

Girls

Total

%

<1 year

12

6

18

16

1–4 years

9

20

29

25

5–9 years

12

8

20

18

10–14 years

14

11

25

22

15–18 years

14

8

22

19

Total

61

53

114

100

 

54%

46%

100%

 

 

Considering the location of the tumor relative to the lumen of the spinal canal, 2 groups were formed: 108 (95%) patients had tumors exhibiting intracanal spread, and 6 (5%) patients had bone tumors that caused spinal stenosis due to expansive intravertebral growth. In the spinal cord, intramedullary and extramedullary tumors were noted in 47 (41)% and 6 (59%) cases). The structures of the operated neoplasms exhibited quite diverse morphology that was classified into 6 groups according to the localization and degree of malignancy (Figure 3).

 

Fig. 3. Histological structure of the operated tumors

 

After the surgical stage, the relevant categories of patients received treatment from oncologists–hematologists. In addition, 1 patient was diagnosed as having acute myeloid leukemia associated with therapy (bone marrow transplantation was performed for the patient). In another patient, the development of cholesteatoma was preceded by multiple lumbar punctures that he received for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In some patients, benign tumors and tumor-like formations of the spinal canal were accompanied by defects in their development.

  1. Metastases of malignant tumors of extra-spinal localization. Four patients (3%) had intramedullary metastases: 1 case of metastasis of the germ cell tumor of the pineal region, 1 case of a teratomatous rhabdoid tumor, and 2 cases of medulloblastoma metastasis.
  2. Benign intracanal neoplasms. This group consisted of 54 (47%) patients, 14 with arachnoid and epidermoid cysts, 5 with cholesteatomas, and 35 with lipomas, including 1 in combination with diastematomyelia and 2 in combination with meningoradiculocele. The fact common to patients with these tumors (lipoma is a mesenchymal non-meningothelial tumor, ICD-O code 8850/0) and tumor-like formations is that the specific treatment of such patients is limited to surgical intervention and does not require further treatment by an oncologist.
  3. Bone tumors of the spine with spinal stenosis. As noted above, this group consisted of 6 (5%) patients, including 3 with Langerhans cell histiocytosis and 3 with fibrous dysplasia of the spine. These patients did not have an intracanal tumor spread, but because of deformation of bone structures, local stenosis of the spinal canal was generated, and compression of the spinal cord or its roots developed.
  4. Intracerebral (intramedullary) low-degree tumors. This group included 12 (11%) patients with neuroepithelial low-grade tumors: 10 patients in which astrocytoma (grades I–II) was verified, and 2 patients in which low-grade ependymoma was noted. It should be noted that the term “intracerebral” largely indicates the origin of the tumor (from the substance of the spinal cord) rather than its formal localization. According to ICD-O, ependymomas of low malignancy are not benign and can have both code 9391/3 (malignant tumors) and 9394/1 (malignancy is not specified). The coding of a low-grade astrocytoma (9421/3, 9420/3, 9410/3) confirms their malignant nature, which is based on the following 2 criteria: 1) the tumor develops in a space in which the vital and functionally significant structures are densely located and 2) there is a probability of their transformation into high-grade tumors. These patients require monitoring by an oncologist regardless of the radical degree of the surgery. In the case of continued growth or a significant residual volume of the tumor after surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy may be performed.
  5. Extracerebral malignant tumors. Out of the 20 (18%) patients with malignant extramedullary intracanular tumors, 1 patient had verified non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, 6 patients had neuroblastoma of the paravertebral ganglia or adrenal gland with invasion of the vertebral canal, 3 patients had primitive neuroectodermal tumor, sarcoma (not specified) was noted in 7 patients, and teratoblastoma (malignant teratoma of immature teratoma grade III) was noted in 3 patients. In all patients, the tumor had spread to the spinal canal and was located in the spinal cord in 3 of them. The treatment of these patients necessarily included conservative antitumor treatment (chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy); therefore, the program of their treatment should be planned in cooperation with the childrens’ oncologists.
  6. Extracerebral intracanal benign tumors. The group comprised 18 (16%) patients. In 3 patients, hemangioblastoma (ICD-O code 9161/1) was diagnosed, and despite intramedullary localization, the tumor did not originate from the brain tissue and is a tumor of the meninges of unknown genesis. Other morphological variants were represented by mature teratoma (9080/0) in 4 patients, neurinoma in 1, ganglioneuroma in 2, neurofibroma (9540/0) in 6, angiofibroma in 1, and meningioma (9539/0) in 1. Patients of this group require postoperative follow-up by an oncologist. Relapses of the disease in this group are extremely rare, but transformation into malignant tumors is possible.

When comparing age and morphological aspects of neoplasms (Figure 4), certain differences were revealed.

 

Fig. 4. Special aspects of the distribution of patients by age and morphological group of tumors

 

Thus, in children <1-year old, “benign neoplasms” accounted for 67% of the total number (12 of 18 cases), including dermoid cysts (4 cases) and lipomas (8 cases). “Malignant extracerebral tumors” were represented by neuroblastoma (2 cases) and malignant teratoma (1 case). Three patients underwent surgery for an extracerebral benign tumor, which was a mature teratoma. The group of children from 1 to 4 years was characterized by an increase in the incidence of neoplasms of the spinal cord and spinal canal. The number of malignant tumors (6 cases) increased twice as much as those in the group of children <1 year, which included 3 cases of neuroblastoma, 1 case of teratoblastoma, 1 case of primitive neuroectodermal tumor, and 1 case of metastasis of the teratomatous rhabdoid tumor. “Benign neoplasms” (17 cases) accounted for 12 cases of lipoma, 2 cases of dermoid cyst, 1 case of cholesteatoma, and 1 case of arachnoid cyst. “Extracerebral benign tumors” were represented by ganglioneuroma, ganglioneurofibroma, mature teratoma, meningioma, and neurofibroma, which were noted as 1 case of each morphological variant. Intracerebral low-degree astrocytoma was diagnosed in a child of 4 years.

In the age group of children from 5 to 9 years, the number of intramedullar tumors was sharply increased (5 cases), including low-grade astrocytomas (4 cases), and low-grade ependymoma (1 cases). “Benign and non-neoplastic formations” were represented by lipoma (5 patients), cholesteatoma (3 cases), and spinal canal cyst (1 case). Additionally, 1 patient had a bone tumor that was a histiocytoma, which causes spinal stenosis. In this age group, the level of malignant tumors was high: neuroblastoma (1 case), teratoblastoma (1 case), and sarcomas (Ewing’s sarcoma, chondrosarcoma) (3 cases) were observed for the first time.

Among children from 10 to 14 years, “extracerebral benign tumors” (6 cases) were represented by neurofibroma (3 cases), hemangioblastoma (2 cases), and neurinoma (1 case). Practically the same level of neuroepithelial low-degree tumors (4 cases of astrocytoma) were observed. Three patients were operated for metastases in the spinal cord of malignant tumors of other localization (gonadoblastoma of the pineal region and medulloblastoma), 1 case of non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma with spinal cord injury (primary presentation), and 1 case of the sacrum sarcoma that had spread into the spinal canal were also identified. Three patients had bone tumors with canal stenosis: histiocytosis (1 case) and fibrous dysplasia (2 cases).

In the older age group (15–19 years) “benign neoplasms” were diagnosed in 9 patients (4 lipomas, 1 cholesteatoma, 4 spinal canal cysts), low-grade neuroepithelial (intracerebral) tumors (astrocytoma and ependymoma) were diagnosed in 2 cases, intracerebral and “extracerebral benign tumors” (2 cases of neurofibroma, 1 case of hemangioblastoma, 1 case of angiofibroma) were diagnosed in 4 cases. In addition, there were 5 cases of “malignant extracerebral tumors” (2 cases of peripheral neuroectodermal tumor and 3 of sarcomas) as well as 3 cases of bone tumors with canal stenosis.

The distribution of patients according to the location of the neoplasm is shown in Figure 5, and a comparison with their morphological variants is shown in Figure 6.

 

Fig. 5. Distribution of surgical interventions depending on the localization (level) of the neoplasm

 

Fig. 6. Level and histological structure of the neoplasms

 

As can be seen from the diagrams, malignant neoplasms were found in all parts of the spine, and the sacrum was more often affected by malignant processes. The greatest specific weight of benign formations was noted in the lumbosacral localization. When analyzing the catamnesis, it was established by September 1, 2017 that out of 110 patients, 16 (14%) died of progression of the tumor process, and 94 (86%) were alive. Thus, according to the regional cohort of the Leningrad Region, the mortality from this type of pathology was 0.2 per 100,000 children per year. The distribution of the deceased according to the level of lesion and the morphological variant of the tumor is presented in Table 3.

 

Table 3. Distribution of mortality causes according to localization and histological tumor* group

Histology/localization

Sacral (7)

Lumbar (21)

Thoracic

(18)

Cervical

(13)

Cervical trunk (6)

Total of the deceased

Share of the deceased, %

Metastases (4)

 

1

1

1

 

3

75

Intracerebral low-grade tumors (12)

    

3

3

25

Benign neoplasm (54)

   

1

 

1

1.9

Extracerebral high-grade tumors (17)

4

1

1

2

1

9

52.9

Total

4

2

2

4

4

16

14

Share of the deceased from the total number of patients in this category, %

57

9.5

11

30.8

66.7

14

 

Note: * the total number of patients with this characteristic in the cohort is indicated in parentheses.

 

The deceased were distributed according to age as follows: <1 year (early lethality), 1 child; 1 to 4 years, 5 children; 5 to 9 years, 3; 10 to 14 years, 4; and 15 to 19 years, 1 adolescent. The cumulative survival rate at the median follow-up of 81 months was 84.6% (Figure 7), 1 patient was lost to observation (with a high probability of the event). There were no significant differences in the survival rates of patients according to sex, age, or localization of the neoplasm with respect to the spinal cord (intra- or extramedullary). The survival rates for patients with tumor location are shown in the Kaplan–Meier curve (Figure 8) and in Table 4.

 

Fig. 7. Total cumulative survival rate

 

Fig. 8. Cumulative survival rates of patients with tumors of the spinal canal according to tumor location

 

Table 4. Survival rates of patients according to level of tumor lesion

Localization

Cumulative survival rate, %

Median follow-up, months

Cervical trunk

33.3

69.5

Cervical section

64.8

36

Cervicothoracic

100

130.5

Thoracic

85.6

114

Lumbar

95

117

Lumbosacral

100

70

Sacral

50

56.5

 

Table 5. Survival of patients with different morphological variants of tumors

Histological group

Cumulative survival rate, %

Median follow-up, months.

Intracerebral low-grade tumors

61.4

100

Benign neoplasms

100

73.5

Extracerebral benign tumors

98.1

136

Bone tumors with canal stenosis

100

139

Malignant extracerebral tumors

54.6

38

Metastasis of tumors of other localization

25

44.5

 

In the pairwise comparison of the groups, the following prognostic relationships were statistically proved: the best prognosis for survival was for patients with tumors of the cervicothoracic, thoracic, and lumbosacral localization, and the worst prognosis was for patients with tumors of sacral localization as well as lesions at the level of the cervical trunk and cervical region. The survival parameters according to the morphological variant of the tumor are shown in Figure 9 and in Table 5.

 

Fig. 9. Cumulative survival rates of patients with different histological variants of the spinal canal tumor

 

Conclusion

  1. The morbidity rate of pediatric patients with spinal tumors and tumor-like diseases in the Leningrad Region for the period 1998–2016 was 1.93 per 100,000 children per year, and the rate for those with neuroepithelial tumors of the spinal cord was 0.3 per 100,000 children per year, which are comparable to epidemiological data for the United States and St. Petersburg. The incidence of malignant tumors of the spinal canal was 0.75 per 100,000 children per
  2. Among the patients who underwent surgery, the mortality rate was 14% and was 0.2 per 100,000 for the corresponding age group population. The data from the epidemiological analysis showed that there were 3 prognostic groups with statistically significant differences in survival:
    • Patients with metastases of extravertebral tumors had the worst prognosis
    • Patients with intracerebral low-grade tumors (61.4%) and malignant extracerebral tumors (54.6%) did not show significant differences in survival rate
    • Patients with bone tumors with canal stenosis and benign intra- and extracerebral neoplasms had the best prognosis.
  3. The survival rate of patients with spinal tumors with a median follow-up of 81 months was 86%, and the cumulative survival rate was 84.6%. The sex and age of the patients as well as the location of the tumor with respect to the spinal cord did not have a significant effect on survival rate.
  4. The survival rates of the patients decreased for patients with tumors located at the level of the trunk and the cervical section of the spinal cord and of the patients with certain histological variants, such as intracerebral low-degree tumors, extracerebral malignant tumors, and tumor metastases of other localization.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Professor A.Yu. Mushkin for the technical assistance provided during the editing of the article.

Funding and conflict of interest

This research was conducted at the Leningrad Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital with the support of the staff of the Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics and First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg, Gorbacheva Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Oncology, Hematology, and Transplantology.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.

×

About the authors

Viktor P. Snishuk

The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics; Leningrad Region Children’s Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: v_p_s@list.ru

MD, Neurosurgeon

Russian Federation, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603; Saint-Petersburg

Maria D. Vladovskaya

First State Pavlov Medical University of Saint Petersburg, R. Gorbacheva Memorial Research Institute for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation

Email: marydeton@mail.ru

MD, PhD, Hematologist, Oncologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey V. Vissarionov

The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics

Email: turner01@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4235-5048

MD, PhD, Professor, Deputy Director for research and academic affairs, Head of the Department of Spinal Pathology and Neurosurgery

Russian Federation, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603

Nikolay A. Krutelev

The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics; Leningrad Region Children’s Hospital

Email: n.krutelev@mail.ru

MD, Neurosurgeon

Russian Federation, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603; Saint-Petersburg

Alexander V. Kaminskiy

Leningrad Region Children’s Hospital

Email: kamin_al@mail.ru

MD, Neurosurgeon

Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg

Irina S. Petrova

The Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics

Email: iskorchagina@gmail.ru

MD, Neurosurgeon

Russian Federation, 64, Parkovaya str., Saint-Petersburg, Pushkin, 196603

References

  1. Белогурова М.Б., Владовская М.Д., Коршунов Н.Б., и др. Эпидемиология опухолей центральной нервной системы у детей за период 1989–1999 гг. // Вопросы гематологии/онкологии и иммунопатологии в педиатрии. – 2002. – Т. 1. – № 1. – С. 35–38. [Belogurova MB, VIadovskaya MD, Korshunov NB, et al. Epidemiology of central nervous system tumours in children in St. Petersburg over 1989-1999. Pediatric Haematology/Oncology and Immunopathology. 2002;1(1):35-38. (In Russ.)]
  2. Мушкин А.Ю., Мальченко О.В. Онкологическая вертебрология: избранные вопросы. – Новосибирск, 2012. [Mushkin AY, Mal’chenko OV. Oncological vertebrology: selected questions. Novosibirsk; 2012. (In Russ.)]
  3. Gurney JG, Wall DA, Jukich PJ, Davis FG. The contribution of nonmalignant tumors to CNS tumor incidence rates among children in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10(2):101-105. doi: 10.1023/A:1008867024545.
  4. Gurney JG, Smith MA, Bunin GR. CNS and Miscellaneous Intracranial and Intraspinal Neoplasms. In: Cancer Incidence and Survival among Children and Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975-1995. Ed by L.A.G. Ries, M.A. Smith, J.G. Gurney, et al. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 1999. P. 51-63.
  5. Heideman RL, Packer RJ, Albright LA, et al. Tumors of the central nervous system. In: Principles and Practices of Pediatric Oncology. Ed by P. Pizzo, D. Poplack. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. P. 633-697.
  6. Kramer K, Kushner B, Heller G, Cheung N-KV. Neuroblastoma metastatic to the central nervous system. Cancer. 2001;91(8):1510-1519. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8<1510::aid-cncr1159>3.0.co;2-i.
  7. Farinotti M, Ferrarini M, Solari A, Filippini G. Incidence and survival of childhood CNS tumours in the Region of Lombardy, Italy. Brain. 1998;121(8):1429-1436. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.8.1429.
  8. Kaatsch P, Rickert CH, Kühl J, et al. Population-based epidemiologic data on brain tumors in Germa children. Cancer. 2001;92(12):3155-3164. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<3155::aid-cncr10158>3.0.co;2-c.
  9. Smith MA, Freidlin B, Gloeckler Ries LA, Simon R. Trends in Reported Incidence of Primary Malignant Brain Tumors in Children in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(17):1269-1277. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.17.1269.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of the number of surgical interventions performed in the "DKB" LOGO in children with tumors and tumor-like diseases in 1998-2016.

Download (11KB)
3. Fig. 2. Age distribution of the patients who underwent surgery

Download (9KB)
4. Fig. 3. Histological structure of the operated tumors

Download (11KB)
5. Fig. 4. Special aspects of the distribution of patients by age and morphological group of tumors

Download (18KB)
6. Fig. 5. Distribution of surgical interventions depending on the localization (level) of the neoplasm

Download (12KB)
7. Fig. 6. Level and histological structure of the neoplasms

Download (18KB)
8. Fig. 7. Total cumulative survival rate

Download (3KB)
9. Fig. 8. Cumulative survival rates of patients with tumors of the spinal canal according to tumor location

Download (5KB)
10. Fig. 9. Cumulative survival rates of patients with different histological variants of the spinal canal tumor

Download (8KB)

Copyright (c) 2018 Snishuk V.P., Vladovskaya M.D., Vissarionov S.V., Krutelev N.A., Kaminskiy A.V., Petrova I.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies