超声和电诊断研究在腕管综合征诊断中作用的比较研究

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

背景。目前,腕管综合征(CTS)诊断的金标准是一个有争议的话题。传统上将神经传导研究(NCS)用作确诊测试,而超声(USG)作为CTS的替代诊断测试已引起了人们的兴趣。现已提出可利用超声测量腕管正中神经横截面积作为CTS确诊的替代方法。

目的:本研究的目的为以经验证结合病史和查体结果的临床诊断工具(CTS-6)为参照,比较超声和电诊断研究在腕管综合征诊断中的敏感性和特异性。

资料与方法。本横断面研究纳入40例(20例病例和20例对照)成年和青少年男女患者,主诉上肢疼痛和感觉异常。所有患者均采用CTS-6临床诊断工具进行评估。CTS评分≥12分的患者考虑为腕管综合症阳性诊断(病例)(主要组)。CTS评分<12分的患者作为对照组。在进行超声和电诊断研究的人员中,将CTS-6和超声检查结果设盲。

结果。我们发现USG的敏感性为90%、特异性为85%、阳性预测值为85.71%、阴性预测值为89.47%。NCS的敏感性为85%、特异性为80%、阳性预测值为80.95%、阴性预测值为84.21%。

结论。采用临床工具CTS-6作为标准参照,USG的敏感性和特异性高于NCS。

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Benthungo Tungoe

Zion Hospital & Research Centre

Email: ben77tungoe@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2072-1457

MD

印度, Dimapur, Nagaland

Rajesh Chopra

Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital

Email: drrkchopra58@yahoo.com

MD, Director Professor

印度, New Delhi

Yatish Agarwal

Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital

Email: dryatishagarwal@gmail.com

MD, Consultant & Professor

印度, New Delhi

Ashish Jaiman

Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: drashishjaiman@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4625-0107

MD, MBBS, MS(Ortho), Professor

印度, New Delhi

参考

  1. Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;(10):2478–2479. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00643
  2. Solomon L, Warwick D, Nayagam S. Apley’s concise system of orthopaedics and fractures. 3rd edition. NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  3. Zyluk A, Kosovets L. An assessment of the sympathetic function within the hand in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010;(5):402–408. doi: 10.1177/1753193409361292
  4. Kuhlman KA, Hennessey WJ. Sensitivity and specificity of carpal tunnel syndrome signs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76(6):451–457. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199711000-00004
  5. Naranjo A, Ojeda S, Mendoza D, Francisco F, Quevedo JC, Erausquin C. What is the diagnostic value of ultrasonography compared to physical evaluation in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(6):853–859.
  6. Amirfeyz R, Gozzard C, Leslie IJ. Hand elevation test for assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(4):361–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.04.007
  7. De Krom MC, Knipschild PG, Kester AD, Spaans F. Efficacy of provocative tests for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Lancet. 1990;335(8686):393–395. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90218-t
  8. Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(9):1373–1381. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00169-4
  9. Graham B. The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2587–2593. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01362
  10. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153–158. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.153
  11. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E. Diagnostic properties of nerve conduction tests in population-based carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders. 2003;4:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-9
  12. Graham B, Regehr G, Naglie G, Wright JG. Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(6):919–924.
  13. Kwon BC, Jung KI, Baek GH. Comparison of sonography and electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.014
  14. Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1089–1094. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5
  15. Buchberger W. Radiologic imaging of the carpal tunnel. Eur J Radiol. 1997;25(2):112–127. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(97)00038-7
  16. Sarría L, Cabada T, Cozcolluela R, Martínez-Berganza T, García S. Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(12):1920–1925. doi: 10.1007/s003300000502
  17. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(7):1914–1921. doi: 10.1002/art.10385
  18. Wang LY, Leong CP, Huang YC, et al. Best diagnostic criterion in high-resolution ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chang Gung Med J. 2008;31(5):469–476.
  19. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology. 200;232(1):93–99. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321030071
  20. Duncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(3):681–684. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470903
  21. El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(7):887–895. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh190
  22. Yesildag A, Kutluhan S, Sengul N, et al The role of ultrasonographic measurements of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(10):910–915. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.03.020
  23. Ashraf AR, Jali R, Moghtaderi AR, Yazdani AH. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with electrophysiologicaly confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;49(1):3–8.
  24. Fowler JR, Munsch M, Tosti R, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: study using a validated clinical tool as the reference standard. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(17):e148. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01250

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. 图 1 USG探头位置

下载 (92KB)
3. 图 2 正中神经(M)、豆状骨(P)和舟状骨(S)定位

下载 (57KB)
4. 图 3 USG阳性结果显示正中神经CSA为10.2mm2

下载 (59KB)
5. 图 4 USG阴性结果显示正中神经CSA为4.9mm2

下载 (64KB)
6. 图 5 测量远端运动潜伏期的电极摆放位置

下载 (108KB)
7. 图 6 测量远端感觉潜伏期的电极摆放位置

下载 (110KB)

版权所有 © Tungoe B., Chopra R., Agarwal Y., Jaiman A., 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.