超声和电诊断研究在腕管综合征诊断中作用的比较研究
- 作者: Tungoe B.N.1, Chopra R.K.2, Agarwal Y.2, Jaiman A.2
-
隶属关系:
- Zion Hospital & Research Centre
- Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital
- 期: 卷 9, 编号 1 (2021)
- 页面: 29-39
- 栏目: Original Study Article
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 28.06.2020
- ##submission.dateAccepted##: 11.01.2021
- ##submission.datePublished##: 15.03.2021
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/turner/article/view/34866
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS34866
- ID: 34866
如何引用文章
详细
背景。目前,腕管综合征(CTS)诊断的金标准是一个有争议的话题。传统上将神经传导研究(NCS)用作确诊测试,而超声(USG)作为CTS的替代诊断测试已引起了人们的兴趣。现已提出可利用超声测量腕管正中神经横截面积作为CTS确诊的替代方法。
目的:本研究的目的为以经验证结合病史和查体结果的临床诊断工具(CTS-6)为参照,比较超声和电诊断研究在腕管综合征诊断中的敏感性和特异性。
资料与方法。本横断面研究纳入40例(20例病例和20例对照)成年和青少年男女患者,主诉上肢疼痛和感觉异常。所有患者均采用CTS-6临床诊断工具进行评估。CTS评分≥12分的患者考虑为腕管综合症阳性诊断(病例)(主要组)。CTS评分<12分的患者作为对照组。在进行超声和电诊断研究的人员中,将CTS-6和超声检查结果设盲。
结果。我们发现USG的敏感性为90%、特异性为85%、阳性预测值为85.71%、阴性预测值为89.47%。NCS的敏感性为85%、特异性为80%、阳性预测值为80.95%、阴性预测值为84.21%。
结论。采用临床工具CTS-6作为标准参照,USG的敏感性和特异性高于NCS。
全文:

作者简介
Benthungo Tungoe
Zion Hospital & Research Centre
Email: ben77tungoe@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2072-1457
MD
印度, Dimapur, NagalandRajesh Chopra
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital
Email: drrkchopra58@yahoo.com
MD, Director Professor
印度, New DelhiYatish Agarwal
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital
Email: dryatishagarwal@gmail.com
MD, Consultant & Professor
印度, New DelhiAshish Jaiman
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: drashishjaiman@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4625-0107
MD, MBBS, MS(Ortho), Professor
印度, New Delhi参考
- Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;(10):2478–2479. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00643
- Solomon L, Warwick D, Nayagam S. Apley’s concise system of orthopaedics and fractures. 3rd edition. NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.
- Zyluk A, Kosovets L. An assessment of the sympathetic function within the hand in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010;(5):402–408. doi: 10.1177/1753193409361292
- Kuhlman KA, Hennessey WJ. Sensitivity and specificity of carpal tunnel syndrome signs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76(6):451–457. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199711000-00004
- Naranjo A, Ojeda S, Mendoza D, Francisco F, Quevedo JC, Erausquin C. What is the diagnostic value of ultrasonography compared to physical evaluation in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(6):853–859.
- Amirfeyz R, Gozzard C, Leslie IJ. Hand elevation test for assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(4):361–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.04.007
- De Krom MC, Knipschild PG, Kester AD, Spaans F. Efficacy of provocative tests for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Lancet. 1990;335(8686):393–395. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90218-t
- Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(9):1373–1381. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00169-4
- Graham B. The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2587–2593. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01362
- Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153–158. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.153
- Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E. Diagnostic properties of nerve conduction tests in population-based carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders. 2003;4:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-9
- Graham B, Regehr G, Naglie G, Wright JG. Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(6):919–924.
- Kwon BC, Jung KI, Baek GH. Comparison of sonography and electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.014
- Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1089–1094. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5
- Buchberger W. Radiologic imaging of the carpal tunnel. Eur J Radiol. 1997;25(2):112–127. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(97)00038-7
- Sarría L, Cabada T, Cozcolluela R, Martínez-Berganza T, García S. Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(12):1920–1925. doi: 10.1007/s003300000502
- Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(7):1914–1921. doi: 10.1002/art.10385
- Wang LY, Leong CP, Huang YC, et al. Best diagnostic criterion in high-resolution ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chang Gung Med J. 2008;31(5):469–476.
- Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology. 200;232(1):93–99. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321030071
- Duncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(3):681–684. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470903
- El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(7):887–895. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh190
- Yesildag A, Kutluhan S, Sengul N, et al The role of ultrasonographic measurements of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(10):910–915. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.03.020
- Ashraf AR, Jali R, Moghtaderi AR, Yazdani AH. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with electrophysiologicaly confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;49(1):3–8.
- Fowler JR, Munsch M, Tosti R, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: study using a validated clinical tool as the reference standard. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(17):e148. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01250
补充文件
