Effect of thermal state on the chemical composition of the mantle and the sizes of the moon’s core
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Effect of thermal state on the chemical composition of the mantle and the sizes of the moon’s core |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | O. L. Kuskov; Vernadsky institute of geochemistry and analytical chemistry, Russian academy of sciences ; Russian Federation |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | E. V. Kronrod; Vernadsky institute of geochemistry and analytical chemistry, Russian academy of sciences ; Russian Federation |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | V. A. Kronrod; Vernadsky institute of geochemistry and analytical chemistry, Russian academy of sciences ; Russian Federation |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Moon; internal structure; chemical composition; temperature; mantle; core |
4. | Description | Abstract | Based on the joint inversion of seismic and gravity data in combination with the Gibbs free energy minimization method for calculating phase equilibria in the framework of the Na2O-TiO2-CaO-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 system, the influence of the thermal state on the chemical composition models of the mantle and the sizes of the Fe-S core of the Moon has been studied. The boundary conditions used are seismic models from Apollo experiments, mass and moment of inertia from the GRAIL mission. As a result of solving the inverse problem, constraints on the chemical composition (concentration of rock-forming oxides) and the mineralogy of a three-layer mantle are obtained. It is shown that regardless of the temperature distribution, the FeO content of 11–14 wt.% and magnesian number MG# 80–83 are approximately the same in the upper, middle and lower mantle of the Moon, but differ sharply from that for the bulk composition of the silicate Earth (Bulk Silicate Earth = BSE, FeO ~8 wt% and MG# 89). On the contrary, estimates of the Al2O3 content in the mantle rather noticeably depend on the temperature distribution. For the considered scenarios of the thermal state with a difference in temperature of 100–200°C at different depths, Al2O3 concentrations increase from 1–5% in the upper and middle mantles to 4–7 wt.% in the lower mantle with garnet amounts up to 20 wt.%. For the “cold” models, the bulk abundance of aluminum oxide in the Moon |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | The Russian Academy of Sciences |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) |
Russian foundation for basic research (Array) Program of the Presidium of RAS (Array) |
7. | Date | (DD-MM-YYYY) | 26.06.2019 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | Research Article |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://journals.eco-vector.com/0016-7525/article/view/14344 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier (DOI) (PDF (Rus)) | 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-10909 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | Геохимия; Vol 64, No 6 (2019) |
12. | Language | English=en | ru |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files |
Fig. 1. Temperature distribution in the lunar mantle obtained by inversion of seismic and gravity data. The profiles of all selenotherms meet the conditions for an increase in temperature over the depth Ti − 1 ≤ Ti ≤ Ti + 1. The solid line is the temperature profile according to the equation T (° C) = 351 + 1718 {1 - - exp [–0.00082H (km)]} (Kuskov, Kronrod, 2009). Crosses are the solidus of peridotite (Hirshmann, 2000). Dashed lines show temperature profiles at medium depths of mantle tanks for “cold” (T150 = 600 ° С, T500 = 900 ° С, T1000 = 1100 ° С) and “hot” (T150 = 700 ° С, T500 = 1100 ° С, T1000 = 1300 ° C) models of the moon. (125KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11775 Fig. 2. Probabilistic estimates of the concentrations of the main rock-forming oxides in the three-layer mantle of the Moon. The composition of the lower primitive mantle corresponds to the gross composition of the silicate moon (mantle + bark = BSM). The calculations were carried out for two scenarios of the thermal state at the middle depths of the mantle tanks: the cold model (cold) and the hot model (hot); see caption to fig. 1. Three-layer mantle model: 1 — upper (39–240 km), 2 — medium (240–750 km), 3 — lower mantle (750 km — core-mantle boundary). (a, a´) - Al2O3, (b, b´) - FeO, (c, v´) - MgO, (g, d´) - SiO2. (370KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11776 Fig. 3. Density of Fe-S melts at different concentrations of sulfur (at.%) Compared to the density of the Moon’s core according to the seismic model (Weber et al., 2011): star filled - outer core (ρ = 5.1 g / cm3) - inner core (ρ = 8 g / cm3). MD calculations of density at 2000 K and sulfur concentrations of 0, 10, and 16 at.% (Solid lines) are given according to (Kuskov, Belashchenko, 2016a, b). The designations of the experiments: B03 (Balog et al., 2003) - Fe-16 at.% S; N16 (Nishida et al., 2016) - Fe-20 at.% S; M18 (Morard et al., 2018) - Fe-29 at.% S; J14 (Jing et al., 2014) is the density of the external Fe-S core at a sulfur concentration of 4 ± 3 wt.%. (95KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11777 Fig. 4. Histograms of calculated Fe-S radii of the Moon's core with an average density of 7.1 g / cm3 and a sulfur content of 3.5–6 wt.% For two scenarios of the thermal state (cold and hot models, see the caption to Fig. 1). (121KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11778 |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions |
Copyright (c) 2019 Russian Academy of Sciences |