Indexing metadata

Effect of thermal state on the chemical composition of the mantle and the sizes of the moon’s core

Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
1. Title Title of document Effect of thermal state on the chemical composition of the mantle and the sizes of the moon’s core
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country O. L. Kuskov; Vernadsky institute of geochemistry and analytical chemistry, Russian academy of sciences ; Russian Federation
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country E. V. Kronrod; Vernadsky institute of geochemistry and analytical chemistry, Russian academy of sciences ; Russian Federation
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country V. A. Kronrod; Vernadsky institute of geochemistry and analytical chemistry, Russian academy of sciences ; Russian Federation
3. Subject Discipline(s)
3. Subject Keyword(s) Moon; internal structure; chemical composition; temperature; mantle; core
4. Description Abstract

Based on the joint inversion of seismic and gravity data in combination with the Gibbs free energy minimization method for calculating phase equilibria in the framework of the Na2O-TiO2-CaO-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 system, the influence of the thermal state on the chemical composition models of the mantle and the sizes of the Fe-S core of the Moon has been studied. The boundary conditions used are seismic models from Apollo experiments, mass and moment of inertia from the GRAIL mission. As a result of solving the inverse problem, constraints on the chemical composition (concentration of rock-forming oxides) and the mineralogy of a three-layer mantle are obtained. It is shown that regardless of the temperature distribution, the FeO content of 11–14 wt.% and magnesian number MG# 80–83 are approximately the same in the upper, middle and lower mantle of the Moon, but differ sharply from that for the bulk composition of the silicate Earth (Bulk Silicate Earth = BSE, FeO ~8 wt% and MG# 89). On the contrary, estimates of the Al2O3 content in the mantle rather noticeably depend on the temperature distribution. For the considered scenarios of the thermal state with a difference in temperature of 100–200°C at different depths, Al2O3 concentrations increase from 1–5% in the upper and middle mantles to 4–7 wt.% in the lower mantle with garnet amounts up to 20 wt.%. For the “cold” models, the bulk abundance of aluminum oxide in the Moon
is Al2O3 ~1–1.2 × BSE, and for the “hot” models it can be in the range of 1.3–1.7 × BSE. Concentrations of SiO2 to a lesser extent depend on the temperature distribution and constitute 50–55% in the upper and 45–50 wt.% in the lower mantle; orthopyroxene, rather than olivine, is the dominant mineral of the upper mantle. Based on the modeling of the density of Fe-S melts at high Р-Т parameters, the sizes of the lunar core are estimated. The Fe-S core radii with an average density of 7.1 g/cm3 and a sulfur content of 3.5–6 wt.% are in the range of 50–350 km with a most likely value of about 300 km and rather weakly depend on the thermal regime of the Moon. The simulation results suggest that a lunar mantle is stratified by chemical composition and indicate significant differences in the compositions of the Earth and its satellite.

5. Publisher Organizing agency, location The Russian Academy of Sciences
6. Contributor Sponsor(s) Russian foundation for basic research (Array)
Program of the Presidium of RAS (Array)
7. Date (DD-MM-YYYY) 26.06.2019
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
8. Type Type Research Article
9. Format File format
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://journals.eco-vector.com/0016-7525/article/view/14344
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI) (PDF (Rus)) 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-10909
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Геохимия; Vol 64, No 6 (2019)
12. Language English=en ru
13. Relation Supp. Files Fig. 1. Temperature distribution in the lunar mantle obtained by inversion of seismic and gravity data. The profiles of all selenotherms meet the conditions for an increase in temperature over the depth Ti − 1 ≤ Ti ≤ Ti + 1. The solid line is the temperature profile according to the equation T (° C) = 351 + 1718 {1 - - exp [–0.00082H (km)]} (Kuskov, Kronrod, 2009). Crosses are the solidus of peridotite (Hirshmann, 2000). Dashed lines show temperature profiles at medium depths of mantle tanks for “cold” (T150 = 600 ° С, T500 = 900 ° С, T1000 = 1100 ° С) and “hot” (T150 = 700 ° С, T500 = 1100 ° С, T1000 = 1300 ° C) models of the moon. (125KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11775
Fig. 2. Probabilistic estimates of the concentrations of the main rock-forming oxides in the three-layer mantle of the Moon. The composition of the lower primitive mantle corresponds to the gross composition of the silicate moon (mantle + bark = BSM). The calculations were carried out for two scenarios of the thermal state at the middle depths of the mantle tanks: the cold model (cold) and the hot model (hot); see caption to fig. 1. Three-layer mantle model: 1 — upper (39–240 km), 2 — medium (240–750 km), 3 — lower mantle (750 km — core-mantle boundary). (a, a´) - Al2O3, (b, b´) - FeO, (c, v´) - MgO, (g, d´) - SiO2. (370KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11776
Fig. 3. Density of Fe-S melts at different concentrations of sulfur (at.%) Compared to the density of the Moon’s core according to the seismic model (Weber et al., 2011): star filled - outer core (ρ = 5.1 g / cm3) - inner core (ρ = 8 g / cm3). MD calculations of density at 2000 K and sulfur concentrations of 0, 10, and 16 at.% (Solid lines) are given according to (Kuskov, Belashchenko, 2016a, b). The designations of the experiments: B03 (Balog et al., 2003) - Fe-16 at.% S; N16 (Nishida et al., 2016) - Fe-20 at.% S; M18 (Morard et al., 2018) - Fe-29 at.% S; J14 (Jing et al., 2014) is the density of the external Fe-S core at a sulfur concentration of 4 ± 3 wt.%. (95KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11777
Fig. 4. Histograms of calculated Fe-S radii of the Moon's core with an average density of 7.1 g / cm3 and a sulfur content of 3.5–6 wt.% For two scenarios of the thermal state (cold and hot models, see the caption to Fig. 1). (121KB) doi: 10.31857/S0016-7525646567-584-11778
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright (c) 2019 Russian Academy of Sciences