Analysis of sedimentary and geochemical characteristics of sedimentary clastic rock samples from Alpha-Mendeleev Rice (underwater sampling)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The paper presents new data from a comparative analysis of sedimentary rocks from the Mendeleev Rise (seamount Shamshura), presumably of Triassic age, with sandstones of Aptian age, obtained during underwater sampling of the Alpha-Mendeleev Rise during expeditions in 2012, 2014 and 2016. The geochemical characteristics of the rocks are very similar, and, as a rule, data from samples of different ages form common fields on different diagrams. The petrographic investigations have established that the sandstones of presumably Late Triassic age, as well as the sandstones of Chukotka and Wrangel Island, are dominated by fragments of shale and acid effusives. The Aptian samples are dominated by fragments of mafic rocks. Also, sharp differences are observed in the nature of the age spectra of detrital zircon populations, indicating fundamentally different feeding provinces for the Triassic and Cretaceous sandstones of the Alpha-Mendeleev Rise. Samples from the Shamshura seamount are characterized by populations similar to populations from Triassic rocks of Chukotka and Wrangel Island, indicating the presence of Triassic rocks in this part of the Mendeleev Rise.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

M. I. Tuchkova

Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: tuchkova@ginras.ru
Russian Federation, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevsky lane, 7, bld. 1

S. G. Skolotnev

Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: tuchkova@ginras.ru
Russian Federation, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevsky lane, 7, bld. 1

S. D. Sokolov

Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: tuchkova@ginras.ru
Russian Federation, 119017, Moscow, Pyzhevsky lane, 7, bld. 1

S. A. Sergeev

All Russian Scientific Research Geological Institute named after A. P. Karpinsky

Email: tuchkova@ginras.ru
Russian Federation, 199106, St. Petersburg, Sredniy ave., V.O., 74

References

  1. Морозов А. Ф., Петров О. В., Шокальский С. П., Кашубин С. Н., Кременецкий А. А., Шкатов М. Ю., Каминский В. Д., Гусев Е. А., Грикуров Г. Э., Рекант П. В., Шевченко С. С., Сергеев С. А., Шатов В. В. Новые геологические данные, обосновывающие континентальную природу области центрально-арктических поднятий // Региональная геология и металлогения. 2013. № 53. С. 34‒55.
  2. Сколотнев С. Г., Федонкин М. А., Корнийчук А. В. Новые данные о геологическом строении юго-западной час-ти поднятия Менделеева (Северный Ледовитый океан) // ДАН. 2017. Т. 476. № 2. С. 190‒196.
  3. Сколотнев С. Г., Фрейман С. И., Хисамутдинова А. И., Ермолаев Б. В., Окина О. И., Сколотнева Т. С. Осадочные породы фундамента поднятия Альфа-Менделеева в Северном Ледовитом океане // Литология и полез. ископаемые. 2022. № 2. С. 136‒160.
  4. Тейлор С. Р., Мак-Леннан С. М. Континентальная кора: ее состав и эволюция. М.: Мир, 1988. 384 с.
  5. Тучкова М. И., Соколов С. Д., Моисеев А. В., Вержбицкий В. Е., Костылева В. В., Ватрушкина Е. В. Литологические характеристики верхнетриасовых осадочных пород Чукотки и о. Врангеля и взаимосвязи с одновозрастными образованиями Восточной Арктики // Геология и геофизика. 2023. № 3. C. 327‒351.
  6. Condiе K. C. Chemical composition and evolution of the upper continental crust: contrasting results from surface samples and shales // Chem. Geol. 1993. V. 104. P. 1‒37.
  7. Floyd P. A., Leveridge B. E. Tectonic environment of the Devonian mode and geochemical evidence from turbiditic sandstones // J. Geol. Soc. London. 1987. V. 144. P. 531‒542.
  8. Geochemistry of Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks: Evolutionary Considerations to Mineral Deposit-Forming Environments / Ed. D. R. Lenz // Geotext 4. 2003. 184 p.
  9. Gu X. X., Liu J. M., Zheng M. H., Tang J. X., Qi L. Provenance and tectonic setting of the Proterozoic turbidites in Hunan South China: geochemical evidence // J. of Sediment. Res. 2002. V. 72. P. 393‒407.
  10. Hayashi K., Fujisawa H., Holland H. D., Ohmoto H. Geochemi- stry of 1.9 Ga sedimentary Rocks from Northeastern Labrador, Canada // Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1997. V. 61. P. 4115‒4137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00214-7
  11. Kossovaya O. L., Tolmacheva T. Yu., Petrov O. V., Isakova T. N., Ivanova R. M., Mirolyubova E. S., Rekant P. V., Gusev E. A. Paleozoic carbonates and fossils of the Mendeleev Rise (eastern Arctic): A study of dredged seafloor material // J. of Geodynamics. 2018. V. 120. P. 23‒44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2018.05.001
  12. McLennan S.M., Hemming S., McDaniel D.K., Hanson G. N. Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics // Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 1993. V. 284. P. 21‒40.
  13. Miller E. L., Gehrels G. E., Pease V., Sokolov S. Stratigraphy and U–Pb detrital zircon geochronology of Wrangel Island, Russia: implications for Arctic paleogeography // American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 94. 2010. P. 665–692.
  14. Pettijohn F. J. Sedimentary Rocks. N. Y.: Harper & Row., 1975. 628 p.
  15. Skolotnev S., Aleksandrova G., Isakova T., Tolmacheva T., Kurilenko A., Raevskaya E., Rozhnov S., Petrov E., Korniychuk A. Fossils from seabed bedrocks: Implications for the nature of the acoustic basement of the Mendeleev Rise (Arctic Ocean) // Marine Geology. 2019. V. 407. P. 148‒163.
  16. Sun S.-s., McDonough W. F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes // Geological Society. Spec. Publ. London. 1989. V. 42. P. 313‒345. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19
  17. Taylor S. R., McLennan S. M. The geochemical evolution of continental crust // Reviews of Geophysics. 1995. V. 33. P. 241‒265.
  18. Tuchkova M. I., Shokalsky S. P., Petrov O. V., Sokolov S. D., Sergeev S. A., Moiseev A. V. Triassic deposits of Chukotka, Wrangel Island and Mendeleev Rise, Arctic Sea: sedimentology and geodynamic implications // GFF. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897.2020.1724668

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The position of the analyzed samples on the geographic map of the Central Arctic uplifts, using the IBCAO overview map (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/bathymetry/arctic/).

Download (454KB)
3. Fig. 2. Microphotographs of sandstones of the Alpha-Mendeleev uplift.

Download (2MB)
4. Fig. 3. Diagrams of sandstone composition.

Download (190KB)
5. Fig. 4. Geochemical diagrams of the compositions of the analyzed Cretaceous samples of the Mendeleev Rise in comparison with the Triassic rocks of Chukotka and Wrangel Island, constructed based on the ratios of different elements.

Download (468KB)
6. Fig. 5. Distribution of rare earth elements in the analyzed samples, normalized to post-Archean Australian shale (PAAS) [Taylor, McLennan, 1988] and chondrite [Sun, McDonough, 1989].

Download (159KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences