Focus and Scope

Over 90 years, there have been more than 1000 issues where the authors and editorial staff have done their best for readers to keep abreast of current advances in medical science and practice and for physicians to master the advanced principles of recognition and treatment of a wide spectrum of visceral diseases.

The papers published in the journal (editorials, original articles, lectures, reviews, etc.) cover both current scientific achievements and practical experience in diagnosing, treating, and preventing visceral diseases. The authors of publications are not only Russian, but also foreign scientists and physicians. All papers are peer-reviewed by highly qualified Russian specialists.

The journal is published monthly. Traditionally, each issue has predominantly certain thematic areas covering individual therapy specializations. Every year, one of the issues is devoted to related problems in practical medicine (allergology and immunology, neurology and psychiatry, obstetrics, oncology, etc.). This all draws the attention of the reading public to the journal.

 

Sections

Clinical observation

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Original articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Procedure for peer reviewing the manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal

All the manuscripts submitted for publication in the journal are peer reviewed (single-blind peer review).

The journal provides peer reviewing of all the submitted materials that are within the remit of the journal for expert evaluation. All peer reviewers are the acknowledged experts who specialize in the field relevant to the reviewed materials and have had publications relevant to the topic of the article being reviewed over the past 3 years. The peer reviews are stored in the publishing and editorial office for 5 years.

Reviewers treat the article as confidential material and strictly follow the author’s right for non-disclosure of the data reported in the manuscript before the article is published. The reviewer may engage additional experts only with permission from the Editorial Board and on a confidential basis.

Reviewers’ comments are sent to the author without disclosing the reviewers’ identity. The Editorial Board makes a final decision whether to publish the manuscript or not after the peer reviews and authors’ answers were received. The Editorial Board sends copies of peer reviews or a substantiated rejection to the authors and also sends copies of the peer reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation if a request has been received by the Editorial Board.

In some cases, the Editorial Board can send the article for an additional peer review, including statistical and methodological reviewing.

The Editorial Board constantly monitors the quality of peer review using the Russian version of the Review Quality Instrument questionnaire (Version 3.2), van Rooyen S., Black N., Godlee F. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:625-9.

 

The Editorial Board of the journal expects that the review process will help to:

  • prevent publishing poor-quality articles and reject the studies that have not been designed and conducted properly;
  • make sure that the data reported in the article are accurate, sufficient, and, where applicable, are presented in compliance with the current international standards CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, CARE, STARD (http://www.equator-network.org);
  • check whether the previous key studies in the corresponding field of science have been cited;
  • make sure that the authors have properly interpreted the data and drawn substantiated conclusions;

and, hence:

  • make a decision whether to publish an article or not and offer suggestions to the authors on how to improve the article (where necessary).

 

Publication Frequency

Monthly

A4 paper format

 

Open Access Policy

"Terapevticheskiy arkhiv" (Therapeutic archive) offers full open access with permitted reuse to meet the needs of authors and maximize article visibility under CC BY-NC 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

 

Editorial Board

  • Irina
    Chazova

    Editor-in-Chief, Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    Acting Director General, Russian Cardiology Research & Production Complex, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).
    Personal site: http://chazova.com/,
    SPIN RSCI: 6175-6138,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7004692881

  • Asfold
    Parfenov

    Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Prof., MD
    Chief of Bowel Disease Department, Moscow Clinical Scientific-and Practical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department (Moscow, Russia).
    Personal site: http://www.mknc.ru/mknts/spetsialisty/spetsialist/parfenov-asfold-ivanovich/?sphrase_id=33752,
    SPIN RSCI: 5142-3632,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7102127073

  • Victor
    Fomin

    Executive Secretary, Prof., Corr. Member of the RAS, MD
    Vice-Dean for medical affairs; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Occupational Diseases, and Pulmonology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 8465-2747,
    Scopus AuthorID: 34769949900

  • Sergey
    Boytsov

    Prof., Corr. Member of the RAS, MD
    Director, National Research Centre for Preventive Medicine of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow, Russia).
    Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.ru/citations?user=35w2qPcAAAAJ,
    SPIN RSCI: 7961-5520,
    Scopus AuthorID: 56580221300,
    ORCID: 0000-0001-6998-8406

  • Igor
    Maev

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    Head, Department of Internal Propedeutics and Gastroenterology, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 1994-0933,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7006155179,
    ORCID: 0000-0001-6114-564X

  • Nikolay
    Mukhin

    Prof., acad. of Russian Acad. Sci., MD
    Director, E.M. Tareev Clinic of Nephrology, Internal Medicine, and Occupational Diseases (Moscow, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 500722,
    Scopus AuhtorID: 7005781094,
    ORCID: 0000-0003-0382-6230

  • Evgeny
    Nasonov

    Prof., acad. of Russian Acad. Sci., MD
    Scientific director, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 5162-6484,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7102614711

  • Valentin
    Pokrovsky

    Prof., acad. of Russian Acad. Sci., MD
    Director, Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Russian Federal Consumer Rights Protection and Human Health Control Service (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 3685-4380,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7202457079

  • Valeriy
    Savchenko

    Prof., acad. of Russian Acad. Sci., MD
    Director General, Hematology Research Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 30036,
    Scopus AuthorID: 8532861000,
    ORCID: 0000-0001-8188-5557

  • Evgeniy
    Chazov

    Prof., acad. of Russian Acad. Sci., MD
    Scientific Director, Russian Cardiology Research-and-Production Complex, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 79181,
    Scopus AuthorID: 35517388200

  • Alexander
    Chuchalin

    Prof., acad. of Russian Acad. Sci., MD
    Director, Research Institute of Pulmonology, Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia (Moscow, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 13572,
    Scopus AuthorID: 14522062600

  • Marina
    Shestakova

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    Deputy director for science, Endocrinology Research Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 7584-7015,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7004195530

  • Yakov
    Vakhrushev

    Prof., MD
    editorial council, Head of Department of Propaedeutics of internal diseases, Izhevsk State Medical Academy, Honored Worker of the Ministry of Health of the Udmurt Republic, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation (Izhevsk, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 1286-8503,
    Scopus AuthorID: 66023267626602326762

  • Andrei
    Vorob'ev

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    editorial council, National Research Center for Hematology (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 8559-9208,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7006737626

  • Vadim Petrovich
    Zaitsev

    Prof., MD
    editorial council, Chief Scientific Officer of the Laboratory of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Moscow Regional Scientific and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Regenerative and Sports Medicine of the Moscow City Health Department (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 8273-9766,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7202078407

  • Rostislav
    Karpov

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    editorial council, Head of the Tomsk Scientific Research Institute, Scientific Director of the Tomsk Scientific Research Institute of Cardiology, Head of the Department of Faculty Therapy, Siberian State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Tomsk, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 8263-2641,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7005961768

  • Feodor
    Komarov

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS
    editorial council, Military Medical Academy S.M. Kirov, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation (St. Petersburg, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 935697,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7101862713

  • Viktor
    Maleev

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    editorial council, Deputy Director for Scientific Work of the Federal Budgetary Institution of Science "Central Research Institute of Epidemiology" Rospotrebnadzor (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 1712-9809,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7006690997

  • Anatolii
    Martynov

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    editorial council, Head of Department of Internal Diseases №1 of the Faculty of Medicine with the course of echocardiography, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Moscow State Medical-Stomatological University named after А.I. Evdokimov, a member of the Presidium of the All-Russian Scientific Society of Cardiology, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 5451-5683,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7102769644

     

  • Yurii
    Nikitin

    Prof., Acad. of the RAS, MD
    editorial council, Head of the Academic group of the FGBU "Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine" of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 6662-2828,
    Scopus AuhtorID: 7102172021

  • Aleksandr
    Pal'tsev

    Prof., MD
    editorial council, Department of Internal Medicine, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Novosibirsk, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 539784,
    Scopus AuthorID: 23474269200

  • Elena
    Parovichnikova

    ditorial council, Head of Scientific and Clinical Department of High-dosage Chemotherapy of Hemoblastoses, Hematopoiesis Depressions and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National Research Center for Hematology (Moscow, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 6693-8661,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7003694853
  • Aleksandr
    Sinopal'nikov

    Prof., MD
    editorial council, Head of Department of Pulmonology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 507953,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7006442148

  • Gleb
    Fedoseev

    Prof., Corr. Member of the RAS
    editorial council, I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation (St. Petersburg, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 102769,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7005776359

  • Vyacheslav
    Chernin

    Prof., MD
    editorial council, Prof. of Deraptment of Faculty Therapy, Tver Medical Academy (Tver, Russia).
    SPIN RSCI: 7936-2842,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7004610051

  • Evgenii
    Shmelev

    Prof., MD
    editorial council, Head of the Department of Differential Diagnostics, Central Scientific Research Institute of Tuberculosis (Moscow, Russia).
    RSCI AuthorID: 184138,
    Scopus AuthorID: 7003886951

 

Indexing

  • Russian Science Citation Index: https://www.elibrary.ru/title_about_new.asp?id=7745
  • PubMed/Medline, Index Medicus
  • Scopus
  • Web of Science Core Collection (Science Citation Index Expanded)
  • Web of Science (Russian Science Citation Index - RSCI, Current Contents Connect, BIOSIS Previews)
  • Google Schoolar
  • Ulrich's Perodicals Directory
  • WorldCat

 

Publishing Ethics

Responsibilities of the Editorial Board

The Editorial Board of the journal complies with the ethical standards approved by the international scientific community. The Editorial Board uses the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Editorial decision-making

The Editorial Board is responsible for making decisions which of the submitted manuscripts will be accepted for publication. The Editorial Board makes the decision regarding a publication based on the journal’s policy, taking into account the current authors’ rights legislation and avoiding defamation and plagiarism. The editorial evaluation of the manuscript is independent of race, ethnicity and gender, religion, citizenship, or political views of the authors. Decision whether to publish an article or not is based exclusively on its scientific relevance, originality, clarity of presentation, and correspondence of the topic to journal’s specialization.

Confidentiality

All the Editorial Board members are responsible for disclosing any information about the submitted manuscript to individuals other than authors, peer reviewers, potential peer reviewers, or publishers.

Conflict of interest

The unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted manuscript cannot be used by the Editorial Board members for their own research without written permission from the authors.

Plagiarism, data falsification, and error correction

In case of an ethical complaint or a conflict situation regarding the manuscript or the published article, the Editorial Board should undertake reasonable countermeasures, together with the publisher, to restore the violated rights. If errors are revealed, the Editorial Board should assist in publishing corrections or refutations. Each reported case of unethical behavior will be considered, even if submitted several years after the article had been published.

The editorial board is guided by the following policy regarding the retraction of publications (download .pdf).

Reviewer responsibilities

Contribution to editorial decision-making

The review process is aimed at facilitating the Editorial Board in editorial decision-making and may also help the author to improve the manuscript.

Timeliness (promptness)

If a reviewer selected by the Editorial Board does not feel competent for reviewing the manuscript or feels that it is not possible to meet the deadline of the review, he/she should promptly notify the Editorial Board and decline to perform the review.

Confidentiality

Any material under review should be regarded as confidential. The material should not be shared or discussed with anyone outside the review process unless approved by the editor.

Objectivity standards

Reviewing should be objective. Subjective critique of the author is not allowed. Reviewer’s opinion should be stated clearly and supported by arguments.

Confirmation of the resources

The reviewer is responsible for determining the cases when the relevant publications have not been cited in the manuscript or listed in the References section. Furthermore, the reviewer should determine whether all the statements, conclusions, and ideas borrowed from other publications had the corresponding references. If the reviewer detects that the manuscript under review significantly coincides with or is similar to another known publication, he/she should notify the Editorial Board.

Disclosure of information and conflict of interest

Non-disclosable information and ideas must be regarded as confidential and cannot be used for one’s personal advantage. Experts should not review manuscripts if they have any possible conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the manuscript authors, as well as companies or institutions related to the manuscript.

Author responsibilities

Credibility and study standards

If the manuscript is based on an original study, the authors must submit the reliable results of their work and an objective discussion of significance of the study. The manuscript should contain all the key data, accurate description of the study details and references in order to ensure reproducibility of the results. Data falsification or the intentionally invalid statements in the manuscript are regarded as unethical and are inappropriate.

Data availability

The Editorial Board can request the authors to submit raw data in addition to the manuscript. The author must be ready to provide public access to these data, provided that public access to the data violates neither confidentiality of the research participants nor rights of an individual or a company owning these data.

Originality, plagiarism, and citing the sources

Authors must submit only original studies. Authors must properly and accurately acknowledge the work of others. Publications that had significantly contributed to preparing the study or underlied its design should also be acknowledged.

Multiple, duplicate, or competing publications

In general, materials describing the contents of the same study should not be published in more than one journal. Submitting the manuscript to more than one journal is considered unethical and inappropriate. Copyrighted materials that have already been published cannot be submitted to the journal. Furthermore, materials under consideration by the Editorial Board must not be submitted to be published elsewhere. When submitting an article, the author must inform the editor about all the previous presentations of the study that can be regarded as a duplicate publication. The author must notify the editor if the manuscript contains the information published by the author in previous reports or submitted for publication elsewhere. In this case, the new article should contain references to the previously published material.

Authorship criteria

Authorship is limited to the individuals that have made a significant contribution to 1) conception and design of the study; data acquisition and interpretation; 2) preparing the first draft of the article or editing the article to improve its quality; and 3) final approval of the manuscript for publication. Each author must participate in the study to an extent sufficient to take public responsibility for the corresponding part of the content of his/her article. Involvement consisting in funding or selecting material for the article is not sufficient reason for inclusion in the list of authors. General guidance of the research group is not sufficient for including in the list of authors.

All the authors must approve the final manuscript and its submission to the journal for publication.

Conflict of interest

When submitting an article to the journal, all authors must sign the form disclosing financial or any other substantive conflict of interest that can be considered to have influenced the study results or their interpretation. All funding sources of the submitted studies must be specified.

Involvement in the peer review process

After the peer review process, the article can be sent to the author for improvement. Authors should be actively involved in the review process: promptly answer the questions and, if necessary, correct the manuscript in accordance with the reviewer’s comments.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies