Analysis of the long-term results of tympanoplasty


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Objective: to assess and compare the anatomical and functional results of tympanoplasty for complete and partial detachment of the tympanic membrane from the handle of the malleus. Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 32 patients diagnosed with chronic tubotympanic suppurative otitis media (mesotympanitis), who were divided into 2 groups, each of which included 16 patients. Results. At 6 and 12 months after surgery, good anatomical results were obtained in 15 (93.8%) and 14 (87.5%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Analysis of tone audiometry thresholds showed that the functional indicators significantly improved compared with preoperative results (p<0.05). Comparison of the functional results between the groups revealed no significant differences (p>0.05). Conclusion. Analysis of the anatomical and functional results of the investigation showed no differences between tympanoplasty procedures for partial and complete detachment of the tympanic membrane from the handle of the malleus.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

V. Saidulaev

Astrakhan Branch National Medical Research Center of Otorhinolaryngology Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia; Astrakhan State Medical University

Email: sultan070487@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Sciences Astrakhan

V. Shpotin

Astrakhan Branch National Medical Research Center of Otorhinolaryngology Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia; Astrakhan State Medical University

Email: sultan070487@mail.ru
MD Astrakhan

A. Yunusov

National Medical Research Center of Otorhinolaryngology Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia

Email: sultan070487@mail.ru
MD; Professor Moscow

A. Grigoryeva

Astrakhan Branch National Medical Research Center of Otorhinolaryngology Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia; Astrakhan State Medical University

Email: sultan070487@mail.ru
MD Astrakhan

V-Kh. Saidulaev

Acad. I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University

Email: sultan070487@mail.ru

参考

  1. Bhutta M. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of otitis media: construction of a phenotype landscape. Audiol Neurootol. 2014; 19 (3): 210-23. doi: 10.1159/000358549
  2. Крюков А.И., Ивойлов А.Ю., Гаров Е.В. и др. Влияние микробной флоры на течение хронического гнойного среднего отита. Мед. совет. 2014; 3: 21-3. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2014-3-21-23
  3. Гаров Е.В., Сидорина Н.Г., Зеленкова В.Н. и др. Анализ эффективности тимпанопластики у больных хроническим перфоративным средним отитом. Вестн. оториноларингол. 2014; 6: 8-11. https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201468-11
  4. Eldaebes M., Landry T., Bance M. Repair of subtotal tympanic membrane perforations: A temporal bone study of several tympanoplasty materials. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (9): 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222728
  5. Haynes D., Vos J., Labadie R. Acellular allograft dermal matrix for tympanoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13 (5): 283-6. doi: 10.1097/01.moo.0000172820.97322.8d
  6. Mohamad S., Khan I., Hussain S. Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otology & Neurotology. 2012; 33 (5): 699-705. doi: 10.1097/MA0.0b013e318254fbc2
  7. Хоров О.Г., Плавский Д.М. Тимпанопластика с применением хрящевых пластин при обширных дефектах барабанной перепонки. Новости хирургии. 2010; 1 (18): 108-13.
  8. Fernandes V., Goel H., De Sousa E. et al. A Comparative Study of Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty with Temporalis Fascia Graft Alone and with Conchal Cartilage. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 2 (71): 1320-6. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1397-1
  9. Vahidi M., Mollasadeghi A., Shahbazian H. et al. Does Malleolus non-Lifting Tympanoplasty have any Advantage Over Malleus Lifting Techniques? Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 28 (84): 7-11.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
##common.cookie##