Non-alternative endovascular operations for emergency indications in patients with blood coagulation system disorders

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Endovascular surgery is widely used for emergency indications and, in some cases, is an non-alternative method of treatment. Four cases of endovascular interventions in patients with disorders of the blood coagulation system and the resulting treatment difficulties were considered.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

G. E. Roytberg

JSC Medicine (Academician Roytberg’s Clinic)

Author for correspondence.
Email: surgeonserge@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0514-9114
SPIN-code: 1032-9122

Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

N. V. Kondratova

JSC Medicine (Academician Roytberg’s Clinic)

Email: surgeonserge@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2421-0558
SPIN-code: 6090-2734

MD, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Moscow

S. A. Prozorov

JSC Medicine (Academician Roytberg’s Clinic); N.V. Sklifosovky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Health Department

Email: surgeonserge@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9680-9722
SPIN-code: 8848-4092

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Patel I.J., Rahim S., Davidson J.C. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the Periprocedural Management of Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Image-Guided Interventions-Part II: Recommendations: Endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30 (8): 1168–84.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.017
  2. Kohli M., Mayo-Smith W., Zagoria R. et al. Image-guided intervention in the coagulopathic patient. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016; 41 (4): 667–76. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0663-5
  3. Patel I.J., Davidson J.C., Nikolic В. et al. Standards of Practice Committee, with Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Endorsement. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 23 (6): 727–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.02.012
  4. Davidson J.C., Rahim S., Hanks S.E. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the Periprocedural Management of Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Image-Guided Interventions-Part I: Review of Anticoagulation Agents and Clinical Considerations: Endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30 (8): 1155–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.016
  5. Potet J., Weber-Donat G., Thome A. et al. Periprocedural management of hemostasis risk in interventional radiology. J Radiol. 2011; 92 (7–8): 659–70 (in French)]. doi: 10.1016/j.jradio.2011.05.006
  6. Manchikanti L., Falco F.J.E., Benyamin R.M. et al. Assessment of bleeding risk of interventional techniques: a best evidence synthesis of practice patterns and perioperative management of anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy. Pain Physician. 2013; 16 (2 Suppl): SE261–318.
  7. Wiltrout C., Kondo K.L. Correction of coagulopathy for percutaneous interventions. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010; 27 (4): 338–47. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267857
  8. Lecompte T.P. Antithrombotic agents and invasive procedures--hematologist point of view. Thromb Res. 2012; 130 (Suppl 1): S61–2. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.08.278
  9. Minici R., Fontana F., Venturini M. et al. A multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluating the clinical outcomes of patients with coagulopathy undergoing transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for acute non-neurovascular bleeding. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59 (7): 1333. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071333
  10. Marto J.P., Strambo D., Hajdu S.D. et al. Twenty-four-hour reocclusion after successful mechanical thrombectomy: associated factors and long-term prognosis. Stroke. 2019; 50 (10): 2960–3. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026228
  11. Li W., Ding J., Sui X. et al. Prognosis and risk factors for reocclusion after mechanical thrombectomy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020; 7 (4): 420–8. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50999
  12. Mosimann P.J., Kaesmacher J., Gautschi D. et al. Predictors of unexpected early reocclusion after successful mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke. 2018; 49 (11): 2643–51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021685

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russkiy Vrach Publishing House