SIMULATION OF THE CASING POSITION DURING MINIPERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The authors investigated the impact of simulating the intraoperative casing position by the Bernoulli techniques (to set up the casing in the horizontal position) on the duration of surgery and the stone-free state during minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. Gadzhiev

A.M. Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency Radiation Medicine, Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters

S. Brovkin

A.M. Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency Radiation Medicine, Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters

V. Grigoryev

A.M. Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency Radiation Medicine, Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters

N. Tagirov

Holy Hosiomartyr Elizabeth City Hospital

S. Popov

Saint Luke Clinical Hospital

V. Obidnyak

Saint Luke Clinical Hospital

A. Pisarev

Saint Petersburg Multidisciplinary Center

S. Petrov

A.M. Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency Radiation Medicine, Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters

References

  1. Тагиров Н.С. Клиническая оценка группы пациентов с коралловидным нефролитиазом // Актуальные вопросы урологии и андрологии. - 2011; 214-6.
  2. Nagele U., Horstmann M., Sievert K.-D. et al. A Newly Designed Amplatz Sheath Decreases Intrapelvic Irrigation Pressure During Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolitholapaxy: An in-Vitro Pressure-Measurement and Microscopic Study // J. Endourol. - 2007; 21: 1113-6.
  3. Nicklas A., Schilling D., Bader M. et al. The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy // World J. Urol. - 2015; 33: 1847-53.
  4. Eastwell P. Bernoulli? Perhaps, but what about viscosity? // Sci. Educ. Rev. - 2007; 6: 1-13.
  5. Turk C., Petrik A., Sarica K. et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis // Eur. Assoc. Urol. - 2015; 69: 475-82.
  6. Mishra S., Jagtap J., Sabnis R. et al. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy // Curr. Opin. Urol. - 2013; 23: 147-51.
  7. Gadzhiev N., Brovkin S., Grigoryev V. et al. Sculpturing in Urology, or How to Make Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Easier // J. Endourol. - 2014; 29 (5): 512-7.
  8. Raman J., Bagrodia A., Gupta A. et al. Natural History of Residual Fragments Following Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy // J. Urol. - 2009; 181: 1163-8.
  9. Hammer 0., Harper D., Ryan P. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis // Palaeontol. Electron. - 2001; 4: 9-18.
  10. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G. et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences // Behav. Res. Methods. - 2007; 39: 175-91.
  11. Kumar P., Bach C., Kachrilas S. et al. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): «in vogue» but in which position? // BJU Int. - 2012; 110: 1018-21.
  12. Ganpule A., Bhattu A., Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc // World J. Urol. - 2014; 33: 235-40.
  13. Mishra S., Sharma R., Garg C. et al. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone // BJU Int. - 2011; 108: 896-900.
  14. Wright A., Rukin N., Smith D. et al. Mini, ultra, micro - nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques // Ther. Adv Urol. - 2016; 8: 142-6.
  15. Sabnis R., Ganesamoni R., Sarpal R. Miniperc // Curr. Opin. Urol. - 2012; 22: 129-33.
  16. Lahme S., Bichler K., Strohmaier W. et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones // Eur. Urol. - 2001; 40: 619-24.
  17. Rassweiler J., Rassweiler M.-C., Klein J. New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy // Curr. Opin. Urol. - 2016; 26: 95-106.
  18. Nagele U., Nicklas A. Vacuum cleaner effect, purging effect, active and passive wash out: a new terminology in hydrodynamic stone retrival is arising -Does it affect our endourologic routine? // World J. Urol. - 2016; 34: 143-4.
  19. Yamaguchi A., Skolarikos A., Buchholz N.-P. et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study // J. Endourol. - 2011; 25: 933-9.
  20. Knoll T., Wezel F., Michel M. et al. Do Patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study // J/ Endourol. - 2010; 24: 1075-9.
  21. Hu G., Guo Z., Liu H. et al. A novel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique: safety and efficacy report // Scand. J. Urol. - 2015; 49: 174-80.
  22. El-Nahas A., El-Assmy A., Mansour O. et al. A Prospective Multivariate Analysis of Factors Predicting Stone Disintegration by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: The Value of High-Resolution Noncontrast Computed Tomography // Eur. Urol. - 2007; 51: 1688-94.
  23. Hein S., Miernik A., Wilhelm K. et al. Endoscopically Determined Stone Clearance Predicts Disease Recurrence Within 5 Years After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery // J. Endourol. - 2016; 30: 644-9.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2017 Russkiy Vrach Publishing House

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies