Radiologic diagnostic methods in maxillary sinusitis caused by dental implant intrusion

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To analyze preoperative computed tomography scans of patients to identify predictors of maxillary sinusitis caused by dental implant intrusion.

Materials and methods. The study involved 35 patients who underwent dental implant placement. In the preoperative period the peculiarities of the anatomy of the facial skull were evaluated, namely, pathologies of the air-bearing passages, factors of the aeration disturbance of the maxillary sinus. The anatomy of the lower wall of the sinus and the thickness of the mucosa were evaluated.

Results. The block of the natural accessory of the maxillary sinus with the middle nasal passage had a statistically significant influence on the development of sinusitis (p = 0,43; r < 0,05). In 86% of the patients who underwent dental implantation sinusitis developed, at the same time 60% of them had some organic pathology of the nasal passages system. When determining the diagnostic significance of the angle between the anterolateral and medial sinus walls for mucous membrane perforation the following results were obtained: AUC=0.609 with 95% CI 0.507-0.710 (p = 0.034). When analyzing the diagnostic significance of maxillary sinus mucosal perforation for predicting implant-dependent complications, the sensitivity of the test is 43.8% and specificity is 84.2%.

Conclusion. CT-assessment of maxillary sinus anatomy is extremely important in predicting postimplantation sinusitis. Special attention should be paid to the risk factors of sinus aeration disturbance as well as to the risk factors of intraoperative perforation of its mucosa.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

M. Y. Beteeva

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba; Maxillofacial Hospital for War Veterans

Author for correspondence.
Email: beteeva95_95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-4173-6876
SPIN-code: 7282-1528
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

I. A. Zaderenko

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: beteeva95_95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0183-4827
SPIN-code: 4479-0045

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

A. A. Muraev

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba

Email: beteeva95_95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3982-5512
SPIN-code: 1431-5936

Professor, MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

K. S. Mkrtchyan

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba; MDC Clinic

Email: beteeva95_95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6040-0052
SPIN-code: 2330-1239
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Hsu Y.H., Pan W.L., Chan C.P. et al. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of Schneiderian membranes: Non-infected and infected membranes, and membrane resolution following tooth extraction: A retrospective clinical trial. Biomed J. 2019; 42 (5): 328–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2019.03.001
  2. Albu S., Baciut M., Opincariu I. et al. The canine fossa puncture technique in chronic odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011; 25 (5): 358–62. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3673
  3. Gang N., JiaMin C., Ye W. et al. Comparing the efficacy of sinus irrigation with traditional Caldwell-Luc procedure following odontogenic cyst surgery involving the maxillary sinus. Sci Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 18136. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97477-z
  4. El-Kholey K.E. Efficacy of two antibiotic regimens in the reduction of early dental implant failure: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43 (4): 487–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.013
  5. Kraus R.D., Espuelas C., Hämmerle C.H.F. et al. Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022; 33 (5): 537–47. doi: 10.1111/clr.13913
  6. Mourão C.F., Lowenstein A., Messora M.R. Is it possible to decrease the occurrence of dental implant failures through the use of preventative antibiotics? Evid Based Dent. 2023; 24 (3): 110–11. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00907-2
  7. Gadzo N., Ioannidis A., Naenni N. et al. Survival and complication rates of two dental implant systems supporting fixed restorations: 10-year data of a randomized controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27 (12): 7327–36. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05323-5
  8. Брудян Г.С., Хабибулина М.М., Струков В.И. и др. Остеоинтеграция зубных имплантатов при климактерическом остеопорозе: стратегии оптимизации, пути и перспективы решения проблемы. Врач. 2023; 34 (7): 80–6 [Brudyan G., Khabibulina M., Strukov V. et al. Osteointegration of dental implants in menopausal osteoporosis: optimization strategies, ways and prospects of solving the problem. Vrach. 2023; 34 (7): 80–6 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.29296/25877305-2023-07-18

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Incidence of post-implantation sinusitis

Download (57KB)
3. Fig. 2. ROC curve describing the relationship between the angle between the anterior lateral and medial walls of the sinus and the subsequent risk of intraoperative perforation

Download (62KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Russkiy Vrach Publishing House