NONINVASIVE SCREENING OF PREGNANT WOMEN


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To define the diagnostic value of a prenatal diagnosis program, by using noninvasive and invasive studies of the most common chromosomal abnormalities (such as Down syndrome and Edwards syndrome) and some multifactorial embryonic/fetal malformations (neural tube defects) in different periods of normal or threatened miscarriage-complicated singleton and multiple pregnancies. Subjects and methods. A total of 2022 women were examined during their first or second trimesters of normal or threatened miscarriage-complicated singleton and multiple pregnancies, who received hormonal therapy. The authors used noninvasive (ultrasonography, biochemical screening, software support to assess risks for fetal pathology (computer-assisted analysis) and invasive (transabdominal choriocentesis or transcervical chorion biopsy in the first trimester of pregnancy, placentocentesis, amniocentesis, cordocentesis in the second trimester to determine embryonic/fetal karyotypes) studies. The data obtained were statistically processed applying the Excel computer program. Results. According to the results of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis, all the women were allocated to 2 groups: those at low and high risk of a baby to be born with chromosomal abnormality. The high risk of the latter (1:130—1:5) was due to the enlarged embryonic collar of area. Multiple pregnancy showed no correlation between the values of serum markers, the high risk of chromosomal disorders in accordance with the computer program, and karyotypic abnormalities. Conclusion. Based on the findings, the authors have stated some propositions that pregnant women should be examined using screening programs. The main propositions are that ultrasound markers have a dominant role in the formation of a group at risk for a baby to be born with a chromosomal abnormality and neural tube defects; invasive diagnosis plays a crucial role in the detection of an embryonic/fetal chromosomal abnormality.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. A BAKHAREV

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: info@ncagip.ru
Moscow

N. A KARETNIKOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Moscow

A. M STYGAR

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Moscow

T. Yu IVANETS

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Moscow

References

  1. Екимова Е.В., Гончарова Е.А., Алексеева М.Л. и др. Хорионический гонадотропин и их свободная β-субъединица // Пробл. репрод. - 2007. - № 1. - С. 96-98.
  2. Пренатальная диагностика наследственных и врожденных болезней / Под ред. Э.К. Айламазяна, В.С. Баранова - М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2006. - С. 116-124.
  3. Been P.A., Donnenfeld A.F. Sequential down syndrome screening: The impotance of first and second trimester test correlations when calculating risk // Cenet. Counseling. - 2005. - Vol. 10. -P. 6390-6397.
  4. Cicero S., Bindra R., Rembouskos G. et al. Integrated ultrasound and biochemical screening for trisomy 21 using fetal nuchal translucency, absent fetal nasal bone, free beta-hCG and PAPP-A at 11 to 14 weeks // Prenat. Diagn. - 2003. - Vol. 23, № 4. - P. 306-310.
  5. Genetic in obstetrics and gynaecology / Eds J.L. Simpson, S. Elias. - 3 rd ed. - Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003. -P. 345-455.
  6. Liao A.W., Heath N., Kamelas K. et al. First-trimester screening for trisomy 21in singleton pregnancies achieved by assisted reproduction // Hum. Reprod. - 2001. - Vol. 16, № 7. - P. 1501-1504.
  7. Malone F.D., Canick J.A., Ball R.H. et al. First-trimester screening or second - trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2005. - Vol. 353. - P. 2001-2011.
  8. Muller F., Dreux S., Lemeur A. et al. Medically assisted reproduction and second trimester maternal serum marker screening for Down syndrome // Prenat. Diagn. - 2003. -Vol. 23, № 13. - P. 1073-1076.
  9. Nicolaides K.H. Screening for chromosomal defects // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. - 2003. - Vol. 21, № 4. -P. 313-321.
  10. Orlandi F., Rossi D., Allegra A. et al. First trimester screening with free β - hCG, PAPP-A and nuchal translucency in pregnancies, conceived with assisted reproduction // Prenat. Diagn. - 2002. - Vol. 22, № 8. - P. 718-721.
  11. Spencer K., Spencer C.E., Power M. et al. Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience // Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. -2003. - Vol. 110, № 3. - P. 147-152.
  12. Wald N.J., Rodeck C., Hackshaw A.K. First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS)] // J. Med. Screen. - 2003. - Vol. 10. - P. 56-104.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies