PERINATAL MORTALITY IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: POSSIBLE WAYS OF ITS REDUCTION


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To analyze perinatal mortality in Russia and its regions and to establish the specific features of its causes in the regions with its different rates. Material and methods. The 2006—2010 official statistical data were used. Statistical and analytical methods were employed. Results. In the Russian Federation, the leading cause of perinatal mortality was infant asphyxia (412.5 per 100 000 live and stillborn births), then respiratory disorders (107.8), congenital anomalies (71.4), endocrine disorders (45.3), and infections (35.9). The causes of perinatal mortality in 2010 were detailed in detail in two Russian Federation’s subjects having its different rates. The incidence of an abnormality as a cause of perinatal mortality was ascertained to vary with its rate. Conclusion. Analysis of the regional aspects of perinatal mortality gives the chance to develop an effective system of measures for further reduction of perinatal losses.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

O. G FROLOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: o_frolova@oparina4.ru

M. P SHUVALOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: m_shuvalova@oparina4.ru

T. K GREBENNIK

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: t_grebennik@oparina4.ru

N. V DOLGUSHINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: n_dolgushina@oparina4.ru

References

  1. Всемирная Организация Здравоохранения. База данных «Здоровье для всех» http://www.euro.who.int/ru/ what-we-do/data-and-evidence/databases/european-health-for-all-database-hfa-db2 (дата обращения 14.03.2012).
  2. Мурашко М.А. Организация региональной неонатальной помощи (на примере республики Коми) // Современные аспекты организации неонатальной помощи. Санкт — Петербург, 2011. — С. 219—229.
  3. Основные показатели деятельности акушерско-гинекологической службы в Российской Федерации в 2010 году. — Москва, 2011.
  4. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения и социального развития Российской Федерации № 1687 от 27 декабря 2011 г. «О медицинских критериях рождения, форме документа о рождении и порядке ее выдачи».
  5. Тульчинский Т.Г., Варавикова Е.А. Новое общественное здравоохранение: введение в современную науку. — Иерусалим: Amutah for education and Health, 1999. -1049 с.
  6. Фролова О.Г., Гудимова В.В., Саламадина Г.Е., Юсупова А.Н. Региональные аспекты перинатальной смертности // Акуш. и гинек. — 2010. — № 5. — С. 84-87.
  7. Denktaį S., Bonsel G.J., Van der Weg E.J. et al. An Urban Perinatal Health Programme of Strategies to Improve Perinatal Health // Matern Child Health J. — 2011. — Aug 26.
  8. Flenady V., Koopmans L., Middleton P. et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and metaanalysis. // Lancet. — 2011. — Vol. 377. — P. 1331—1340.
  9. Smith G.C., Fretts R.C. Stillbirth // Lancet. — 2007. — Vol. 370. — P. 1715—1725.
  10. Tanaka S., Stock S.J., Yamamoto Y. et al. Understanding perinatal mortality // Obst. Gynec. еМ Reprod Medicine. — 2010. — Vol. 20 — P. 311—322.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2012 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies