EFFICIENCY OF IVF PROGRAM IN WOMEN WITH UTERINE MYOMA IN RELATION TO ENDOMETRIAL MORPHOFUNCTIONAL STATE


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Subjects and methods. Endometrial morphological and immunohistochemical features were studied in 52 patients with intramural uterine myoma (or concurrent with subserous myoma) up to 4 cm in diameter with no deformity of the uterine cavity, 53 patients after laparoscopic myomectomy (for intramural uterine myoma) without opening the uterine cavity, and 53 women with tuboperitoneal factor infertility with no myometrial pathology. Results. Conception rates were 23.1% in Group 1, 30.2% in Group 2, and 41.5% in the control group, the decrease in the conception rate being statistically significant in the uterine myoma group as compared with the control. Implantation rates were 11.9, 16.2, and 23.9%, respectively, those being significantly higher in the control group than in the uterine myoma and postmyomectomy groups. Patients with a successful IVF attempt showed a higher level of mature pinopodia-containing cells, higher expression of progesterone receptors in the endometrial stroma, and less pronounced expression of estrogen receptors in the surface epithelium and glands. Conclusion. In the patients who had undergone laparoscopic myomectomy prior to the IVF program, the conception rate was comparable with that in the patients without uterine myoma, which supports the need for myomectomy if intramural nodules are 4 cm or more in diameter. It is necessary to conduct an in-depth investigation involving the determination of a wider range of markers to study the mechanisms of action of uterine myoma on endometrial receptivity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. E MARTYNOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: Anaabrossimova@yandex.ru

V. Yu SMOLNIKOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_smolnikova@oparina4.ru

T. A DEMURA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_demura@oparina4.ru

E. A KOGAN

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: e_kogan@oparina4.ru

References

  1. Корнеева И.Е. Роль эндометрия в неудачах реализации репродуктивной функции. Проблемы репродукции. 2010; 2: 16-20.
  2. Нерсесова И.И. Стимуляция суперовуляции и миома матки в рамках программы ЭКО и ПЭ: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2001. 23с.
  3. Sunkara S.K., Khairy M., El-Toukhy T., Khaiaf Y., Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25(2): 418-29.
  4. Metwally М., Farquhar C.M., Li T.C. Is another meta-analysis on the effects of intramural fibroids on reproductive outcomes needed? Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2011; 23(1): 2-14.
  5. Haouzi D., Dechaud H., Assou S., De Vos J., Hamamah S. Insights into human endometrial receptivity from transcrip-tomic and proteomic data. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2012; 24(1): 23-34.
  6. Horcajadas J.A., Minguez P., Dopazo J., Esteban F.J., Dominguez F., Giudice L.C. et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation induces a functional genomic delay of the endometrium with potential clinical implications. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008; 93(11): 4500-10.
  7. Pritts E.A., Parker W.H., Olive D.L. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil. Steril. 2009; 91(4): 1215-23.
  8. Rackow B.W., Arici A. Fibroids and in-vitro fertilization: which comes first? Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 17(3): 225-31.
  9. Somigliana E., Benedictis S., Vercellini P., Nicolosi A.E., Benaglia L., Scarduelli C. et al. Fibroids not encroaching the endometrial cavity and IVF success rate: a prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26(4): 834-9.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies