CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS DURING AUTOPLASMA DONATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the impact of autodonor plasmapheresis (PA) on the central and peripheral hemodynamics and blood oxygen-carrying function in pregnant women, by applying an integral computer monitoring system. Subjects and methods. A study group consisted of 212 pregnant women. Autoplasma was banked by intermittent plasmapheresis in an amount of 340-700 ml during 1-2 sessions at one-week interval at 32-37 weeks gestation, then stored, and transfused during surgery or labor. The central and peripheral hemodynamics and blood oxygen-carrying function during autodonor PA were assessed using an integral computer monitoring system that could use noninvasive procedures to record a wide range of indicators: heart rate; respiratory rate; systolic blood pressure (BP); mean BP; diastolic BP; stroke volume; cardiac output; arterial blood oxygen saturation; cardiac index (CI); stroke index; total peripheral vascular resistance; left ventricular work index; peripheral vascular resistance index; oxygen content in 100 ml of arterial blood (CaO2); oxygen delivery index. The patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to their CI: 1) 64 (30.2%) women with hyperkinetic circulation (5.0 L/min/m 2), 2) 106 (50%) women with eukinetic circulation (2.84 CI<5.0 L/min/m 2); 3) 42 (19.8%) with hypokinetic circulation (CI<2.8 L/min/m 2) Results. Analysis of the time course of changes in the parameters of central and peripheral hemodynamics and systemic oxygen transport showed that autoplasma donation had no significant impact on the status of pregnant women with hyperkinetic and eukinetic circulation. During PA, the pregnant women with hypokinetic circulation may show a short-term reduction in volumetric hemodynamic parameters; however, there is no blood oxygen-carrying dysfunction due to high hemoglobin levels. Doppler study provided support that autodonor PA had no negative effect on the fetus. Conclusion. The introduction of blood-saving techniques into obstetric/gynecological practice will be able to decrease the use of donor blood and its components, thus reducing the risk of different posthemotransfusion complications.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

T. A FEDOROVA

Acad. V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_fyodorova@oparina4.ru

O. V ROGACHEVSKY

Acad. V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: o_rogachevskiy@oparina4.ru

S. V SOKOLOGORSKY

Acad. V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: docsvs@mail.ru

N. Yu BUSHUEVA

Acad. V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: Bushuevanat@gmail.com

References

  1. Carroli G., Cuesta C., Abalos E., Gulmezoglu A.M. Epidemiology of post-partum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gyrnecol. 2008; 22(6): 999-1012.
  2. Баранов И.И. Акушерские кровотечения: гемотрансфузионные принципы профилактики и лечения: Дис.. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 1999. 226с.
  3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Green-top Guideline No. 52. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrage. May 2009.
  4. Reyal F., Sibony O., Oury J.F., Luton D., Bang J., Blot P. Criteria for transfusion in severe postpartum hemorrhage: analysis of practice and risk factors. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2004; 112(1): 61-4.
  5. Wise А., Clark V. Challenges of major obstetric haemorrhage. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 24: 353-65.
  6. Литманович К.Ю., Селиванов Е.А., Дуткевич И.Г. Проблемы безопасности и эффективности гемотрансфузионной терапии. Эфферентная терапия. 2004; 10(3): 37-47.
  7. Blajchman M.A., Vamvakas E.C. The continuing risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 355: 1303-5.
  8. Сухих Г.Т., Федорова Т.А., Рогачевский О.В., Фотеева Т.С., Стрельникова Е.В., Бакуридзе Э.М., Очан А.С. Аутоплазмо-донорство в акушерстве (Медицинская технология, регистр. № 2009/334). М.; 2009. 11с.
  9. Сухих Г.Т., Федорова Т.А., Рогачевский О.В, Фотеева Т.С., Стрельникова Е.В., Бакуридзе Э.М. и др. Интраоперационная реинфузия аутологичных эритроцитов при абдоминальном родоразрешении (Медицинская технология, регистр. №2009/329). М.; 2009. 12с.
  10. Федорова Т.А., Рогачевский О.В. Кровесберегающие технологии в акушерской практике. Современные медицинские технологии. 2009; 2: 59-62.
  11. Nagy C.J., Wheeler A.S., Archer T.L. Acute normovolemic hemodilution, intraoperative cell salvage and Pulse CO hemodynamic monitoring in Jehovah’s Witness with placenta percreta. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2008; 17(2):159-63.
  12. Шмаков Р.Г., Сидельникова В.М. Механизмы адаптации и дизадаптации гемостаза при беременности. М.: Триада-Х; 2004.191с.
  13. Сокологорский С.В. Мониторно-компьютерное обеспечение безопасности анестезии при абдоминальных вмешательствах в акушерско-гинекологической клинике: Автореф. дис. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2003. 27с.
  14. Сокологорский С.В. Экспресс-диагностика гемодинамических и кислородтранспортных нарушений. В кн.: Критические состояния в акушерстве, гинекологии и неонатологии: Материалы конференции. М.; 2002: 45-7.
  15. Воробьев П.А. Прерывистый плазмаферез в интенсивной терапии: Автореф. дис.. д-ра мед. наук. Барнаул; 1997. 65с.
  16. Баранов И.И., Абубакирова А.М., Мурашко Л.Е., Бурлев ВА. Плазмаферез в комплексном лечении легких и среднетяжелых форм ОПГ-гестоза. Акушерство и гинекология. 1996; 5: 24-7.
  17. Кулаков В.И., Серов В.Н., Абубакирова А.М. Клиническая трансфузиология в акушерстве, гинекологии и неонатологии. М.: Триада-Х; 2001. 205с.
  18. Davies L., Brown T.J., Haynes S., Payne K., Elliott R.A., McCollum C. Cost-effectiveness of cell salvage and alternative methods of minimizing perioperative allogenic blood transfusion: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol. Assess. 2006; 10(44): iii-iv; ix-x; 1-210.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies