RUSSIA'S TRENDS TOWARD A DECREASE IN PERINATAL LOSSES IN VIEW OF TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL BABY BIRTH REGISTRATION CRITERIA


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Russia’s transition in 2012 to the new rules of baby birth registration in accordance with the criteria recommended by the WHO is an indispensable step towards improving maternity and child health care. Objective. To assess perinatal loss trends in the obstetric hospitals of the Russian Federation in 2002 and 2012 and to reveal the 2012 indicator changes caused by the transition to the international birth registration system. Subject and methods. The 2002-2012 data available in all health care facilities subordinated to the Ministry of Health of Russia from 83 subjects of the Russian Federation were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis involved descriptive and analytical statistical techniques. The authors analyzed the patterns of changes in the phenomena under study in time, by applying a simple linear regression model, as well as the components of time series. Results. The 2002-2012 perinatal and early neonatal mortality and stillbirth rates in the obstetric hospitals with consideration for babies with birth weights of 500 g or more showed a stable declining trend. 2012 was marked by a greater average annual decrement in perinatal loss rates among the babies with birth weights of 500 g or more and those with birth weights of 500-999 g and by an increment in these rates among the babies with birth weights of 1000-1499 g. Linear regression analysis could assess differences between officially registered and modeled perinatal loss rates. The Russian perinatal loss rates in 2012 became close to those in European countries to a greater extent. Conclusion. Russia’s transition in 2012 to the WHO registration of babies with birth weights of 500 g or more at 22 weeks’ gestation has primarily provided more insight and extended the possibilities of further international comparisons.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

G. T SUKHIKH

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: g_sukhikh@oparina4.ru

E. N BAIBARINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: BaybarinaEN@rosminzdrav.ru

M. P SHUVALOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m_shuvalova@oparina4.ru

T. V PISMENSKAYA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_pismenskaya@oparina4.ru

References

  1. Dallolio L., Lenzi J., Fantini M.P. Temporal and geographical trends in infant, neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in Italy between 1991 and 2009. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2013, 39: 19-23.
  2. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Международная статистическая классификация болезней и проблем, связанных со здоровьем. Десятый пересмотр. Сборник инструкций. т.2. М.: ВОЗ; 2003: 145-8.
  3. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian perinatal health report. 2008 ed. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2008.
  4. Kowaleski J. State definitions and reporting requirements for live births, fetal deaths, and induced terminations of pregnancy. 1997 revision. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics; 1997.
  5. Euro-Peristat project in collaboration with SCPE, Eurocat and Euroneostat. Better statistics for better health for pregnant women and their babies in 2004. European Perinatal Health Report; 2008.
  6. Macfarlane A., Gissler M., Bolumar F, Rasmussen S. The availability of perinatal health indicators in Europe. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2003; 111(Suppl.1): S15-32.
  7. Lack N., Zeitlin J., Krebs L., Kunzel W., Alexander S. Methodological difficulties in the comparison of indicators of perinatal health across Europe. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2003; 111(Suppl.1): S33-44.
  8. Mohangoo A.D., Buitendijk S.E., Szamotulska K, Chalmers J., Irgens L.M., Bolumar F. et al. Gestational age patterns of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe: results from the Euro-Peristat project. PLoS One. 2011; 6(11): e24727.
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Stillbirths. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
  10. Joseph K.S., Liu S., Rouleau J., Lisonkova S., Hutcheon J.A., Sauve R. et al. Influence of definition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study. Br. Med. J. 2012; 344: e746.
  11. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2010. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank; 2012. 59 p.
  12. Horbar J.D., Carpenter J.H., Badger G.J., Kenny M.J., Soll R.F., Morrow K.A., Buzas J.S. Mortality and neonatal morbidity among infants 501 to 1500 grams from 2000 to 2009. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(6): 1019-26.
  13. Lasswell S.M., Barfield W.D., Rochat R.W., Blackmon L. Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010; 304: 9921000.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies