Current reproductive choice strategies: World and Russian experience


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The review provides current contraceptive strategies based on the wider use of planned and emergency contraception and, in case of their poor efficacy, up-to-date techniques for pregnancy termination. It gives the results of the largest population-based study of awareness and use of current contraceptive methods in Russia. Long-acting reversible contraception is shown to be more highly adherent and effective than combined oral contraceptives. There is information on the safety and minimization of complications in case of drug-induced abortion.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

G. B Dikke

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Ministry of Education and Science of Russia

Email: galadikke@yandex.ru
Honoured Science and Education, MD, professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine faculty of continuing medical education

References

  1. Singh S., Wulf D., Hussain R., Bankole A., Sedgh G. Abortion worldwide: a decade of uneven progress (Report). New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2009. 65 р.
  2. Singh S., Darroch J.E., Vlassoff M., Nadeau J. Adding it Up: The benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health care (Report). New York: The Guttmacher Institute and UNFPA; 2009. 41 р.
  3. Садвокасова Е.А. Социально-гигиенические аспекты регулирования размеров семьи. М.: Медицина; 1969: 30. [Sadvokasova E.A. Sociohygienic aspects of family planning. M.: Meditsina; 1969: 30. (in Russian)]
  4. David H.P., Skilogianis J., eds. From abortion to contraception: a resource to public policies and reproductive behavior in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the present. Westport, Conn.; London: Greenwood Press; 1999: 145-64.
  5. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research; 2012. 123 p.
  6. Дикке Г.Б., Ерофеева Л.В. Современные особенности национальной контрацепции: информированность, применение и эффективность. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2014; 13(5): 63-71. [Dikke G.B., Erofeeva L.V. Modern features of national contraception: knowledge, application and effectiveness. Voprosyi ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2014; 13(5): 63-71. (in Russian)]
  7. Денисов Б.П., Сакевич В.И. Применение контрацепции в России (по материалам выборочного обследования). Доказательная медицина и клиническая эпидемиология. 2009; 1: 34-9. [Denisov B.P., Sakevich V.I. The use of contraception in Russia (based on a sample survey). Dokazatelnaya meditsina i klinicheskaya epidemiologiya. 2009; 1: 34-9. (in Russian)]
  8. World Abortion Policies. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2012. Available at: http://www.un.org/.
  9. Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родовспоможения в Российской Федерации. Сборник статистических материалов. М.; 2013. 200 с. [The main indicators of maternal and child health, child welfare service activities and obstetrics in the Russian Federation. Compilation of statistics. M.; 2013. 200 p. (in Russian)]
  10. Hooper D.J. Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey. Clin. Drug Investig. 2010; 30(11): 749-63.
  11. Прилепская В.Н., Назарова Н.М., Тарасова М.А., Летуновская А.Б. Международный проект «CHOICE»: краткий обзор результатов исследования. Гинекология. 2010; 12(4): 26-8. [Prilepskaya V.N., Nazarova N.M., Tarasova M.A., Letunovskaya A.B. The international project «CHOICE»: an overview of research results. Ginekologiya. 2010; 12(4): 26-8. (in Russian)]
  12. Stoddard A., McNicholas C., Peipert J.F. Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception. Drugs. 2011; 71(8): 969-80.
  13. Thompson K.M., Speidel J.J., Saporta V., Waxman N.J., Harper C.C. Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2011; 83(1): 41-7.
  14. Дикке Г.Б., Яроцкая Е.Л., Ерофеева Л.В. Стратегическая оценка политики, программ и услуг в сфере непланируемой беременности, абортов и контрацепции в Российской Федерации. Совместное исследование МЗ и СР РФ и ВОЗ. Проблемы репродукции. 2010; 3: 92-107. [Dikke G.B., Yarotskaya E.L., Erofeeva L.V. Strategic Assessment of policies, programs and services in unplanned pregnancy, abortion and contraception in the Russian Federation. A joint study of Ministry of Health of Russia and WHO. Problemyi reproduktsii. 2010; 3: 92-107. (in Russian)]
  15. Дикке Г.Б. Контраверсии безопасного и небезопасного аборта. Доктор.Ру. Гинекология. Эндокринология. 2014; 8(96): 51-5. [Dikke G.B. Contraversions of safe and unsafe abortion. Doktor.Ru. Ginekologiya. Endokrinologiya. 2014; 8(96): 51-5. (in Russian)]
  16. Charles V.E., Polis C.B., Sridhara S.K., Blum R.W. Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence. Contraception. 2008; 78(6): 436-50.
  17. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The care of women requesting induced abortion. London (England); 2011; Nov. 130 p. (Evidence-based Clinical Guideline. no. 7). Available at: http://www.rcog.org.uk.
  18. Ancel P.Y., Lelong N., Papiernik E., Saurel-Cubizolles M.J., Kaminski M.; EUROPOP. History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Hum. Reprod. 2004; 19(3): 734-40.
  19. Taylor V.M., Kramer M.D., Vaughan T.L., Peacock S. Placental previa in relation to induced and spontaneous abortion: a population-based study. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 82(1): 88-91.
  20. Hogue C.J.R., Boardman L.A., Stotland N. Answering questions about longterm outcomes. In: Paul M., Lichtenberg S., Borgatta L., Grimes D.A., Stubblefield P.G., Creinin M.D., eds. Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy: comprehensive abortion care. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009: 252-63.
  21. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Induced termination of pregnancy and future reproductive outcomes - current evidence. 16 September, 2009. Available at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/. Дата обращения 22.06.2014.
  22. Brown J.S., Adera T., Masho S.W. Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and preterm births. J. Commun. Health. 2008; 62(1): 16-22.
  23. Voigt M., Henrich W., Zygmunt M., Friese K., Straube S., Briese V. Is induced abortion a risk factor in subsequent pregnancy. J. Perinat. Med. 2009; 37(2): 144-9.
  24. Henriet L., Kaminski M. Impact of induced abortions on subsequent pregnancy outcome: the 1995 French national perinatal survey. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2001; 108(1): 1036-42.
  25. Bhattacharya S., Lowit A., Bhattacharya S., Raja E.A., Lee A.J., Mahmood T., Templeton A. Reproductive outcomes following induced abortion: a national register-based cohort study in Scotland. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4): e000911.
  26. Templeton A., Grimes D.A. A request for abortion. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 365: 2198-204.
  27. American Psychological Association, Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Report of the Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Washington, DC; 2008. Available at: http://www.apa.org/
  28. Russo J.A., Achilles S., DePineres T., Gil L. Controversies in family planning: postabortal pelvic inflammatory disease. Contraception. 2012; 87(4): 497-503.
  29. Lohr P.A., Fjerstad M., DeSilva U., Lyus R. Abortion. Clinical review. Br. Med. J. 2014; 348: 755-62.
  30. Плотко Е.Э. Прогнозирование, профилактика, диагностика и лечение осложнений искусственного прерывания беременности: автореф. дисс.. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2013. 48 с. [Plotko E.E. Prediction, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of complications of induced abortion. Diss. M.; 2013. 48 p. (in Russian)]
  31. Virk M.S., Zhang J., Olsen J. Abortion and the risk of subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007; 357(7): 648-53.
  32. Beral V., Bull D., Doll R., Peto R., Reeves G.; Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries”. Lancet. 2004; 363(9414): 1007-16.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies