LAPAROSCOPY IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER PATIENTS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Subjects and methods. The paper presents treatment results in 59 gynecological cancer patients, 24 of them were laparoscopically operated on. Results. During laparoscopy, no significant differences were found in the volume of removed tissues and in the number of lymph nodes, but blood loss and hospital stay length considerably reduced. Conclusion. The development and use of operative laparoscopy is a promising area in gynecological oncology; the technique may be used as a surgical stage for the treatment of cancers of the female reproductive system.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry Leonidovich Ovodenko

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: d_ovodenko@oparina4.ru
PhD, oncogynecologist, Department of combined and integrated methods of treatment of gynecological diseases Moscow 117997, Ac. Oparina str. 4, Russia

N. Gregory Habas

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: g_khabas@oparina4.ru
MD, Ph.D., head of the Department of combined and integrated methods of treatment of gynecological diseases Moscow 117997, Ac. Oparina str. 4, Russia

Dmitri Viktorovna Kushlinsky

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m_sannikova@oparina4.ru
oncogynecologist, Department of combined and integrated methods of treatment of gynecological diseases Moscow 117997, Ac. Oparina str. 4, Russia

Maya V. Sannikov

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: d_kushlinskiy@oparina4.ru
PhD, researcher at the Department of combined and integrated methods of treatment of gynecological diseases Moscow 117997, Ac. Oparina str. 4, Russia

Alexey Aleksandrovich Korshunov

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_korshunov@oparina4.ru
obstetrician-gynecologist, Department of combined and integrated methods of treatment of gynecological diseases Moscow 117997, Ac. Oparina str. 4, Russia

References

  1. Backes F.J., Fowler J.M. Hysterectomy for the treatment of gynecologic malignancy. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 57(1): 115-27.
  2. Mandic A., Golubovic A, Majdevac I. Laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: a review of literature. Vojnosanit. Pregl. 2013; 70(9): 861-5.
  3. Nezhat F.R., Pejovic T, Finger T.N., Khalil S.S. Role of minimally invasive surgery in ovarian cancer. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20(6): 754-65.
  4. Querleu D, Leblanc E. Laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological oncology. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 15(4): 309-14.
  5. Dottino P.R., Tobias D.H., Beddoe A., Golden A.L., Cohen C.J. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol. Oncol. 1999; 73: 383-8.
  6. Jennings T.S., Dottino P., Rahaman J., Cohen C.J. Results of selective use of laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol. Oncol. 1998; 70: 323-8.
  7. Nezhat C., Siegler A., Nezhat F., Nezhat C., Seidman D., Luciano A. Operative gynecologic laparoscopy principles and techniques. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
  8. Querleu D., Leblanc E, Castelain B., Lanvin D., Denoit V. New therapeutic plans for cancer of the cervix. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2000; 29(3): 254-7.
  9. Querleu D., Leblanc E., Martel P., Ferron G., Narducci F. Lymph node dissection in the surgical management of stage I endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2003; 31(12): 1004-12.
  10. Nagarsheth N.P., Rahaman J., Cohen C.J., Gretz H., Nezhat F. The incidence of port-site metastases in gynecologic cancers. JSLS J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2004; 8(2): 133-9.
  11. Dargent D. Laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2000; 29(3): 282-4.
  12. Kruitwagen R., Swinkels B.M., Keyser K., Doesburg W.H., Schijf C. Incidence and effect on survival of abdominal wall metastases at trocar or puncture sites following laparoscopy or paracentesis in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 1996; 60: 233-7.
  13. Lecuru F., Desfeux P, Camatte S., Bissery A., Robin F., Blanc B., Querleu D. Stage I ovarian cancer: comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy on staging and survival. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2004; 25(5): 571-6.
  14. Fanfani F., Fagotti A., Ercoli A., Bifulco G., Longo R., Mancuso S., Scambia G. A prospective randomized study of laparoscopy and minilaparotomy in the management of benign adnexal masses. Hum. Reprod. 2004; 19(10): 2367-71.
  15. Goudge C.S., Li Z., Downs L.S. Jr. The influence of intraoperative tumor rupture on recurrence risk in Stage Ic epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2009; 30(1): 25-8.
  16. Kim H.S., Ahn J.H., Chung H.H., Kim J.W., Park N.H., Song Y.S. et al. Impact of intraoperative rupture of the ovarian capsule on prognosis in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013; 39(3): 279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.12.003.
  17. Jayne D.G., Thorpe H.C., Copeland J., Quirke P., Brown J.M., Guillou P.J. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of lapa- roscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2010; 97(11): 1638-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7160.
  18. Kaiser A.M., Kang J.C., Chan L.S., Vukasin P., Beart R.W. Jr. Laparoscopic- assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2004; 14(6): 329-34.
  19. Chua T.C., Yan T.D., David L. Morris D.L., Sugarbaker P.H. Port-site metastasis following laparoscopic surgery. In: Shamsa A., ed. Advanced laparoscopy. In Tech, Croatia; 2011: 1-12.
  20. Kim S.H., Park I.J., Joh Y.G., Hahn K.Y. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients. Surg. Endosc. 2006; 20(8): 1197-202.
  21. SalicrU S., Gil-Moreno A., Montero A., Roure M., Perez-Benavente A., Xercavins J. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18(5): 555-68.
  22. Terai Y., Tanaka T., Sasaki H., Kawaguchi H., Fujiwara S., Yoo S. et al. Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2014; 40(2): 570-5. doi: 10.1111/jog.12194.
  23. Covens A.L., Dodge J.E., Lacchetti C., Elit L.M., Le T., Devries-Aboud M., Fung-Kee-Fung M.; Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group. Surgical management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a systematic review. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012; 126(1): 149-56.
  24. Раков А.И. Принцип анатомической зональности и футлярнос- ти при удалении злокачественных опухолей. В кн.: Проблемы онкологии. Труды института онкологии АМН СССР. Л.: Медгиз; 1960; вып. 3: 5-13.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2015 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies