The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health

Authors: Khan K.¹
Affiliations:
1. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Issue: No 2 (2016)
Pages: 5-7
Section: Articles
URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/247590
ID: 247590

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

On behalf of Chief Editors of Journals participating in The CROWN Initiative listed at the end of this article

Research design/standards, treatment outcome, endpoint determination/standards, clinical trials, systematic reviews, guidelines, bias (Epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, consensus

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Editor-in-Chief

Williamson P.R., Altman D.G., Blazeby J.M., Clarke M., Devane D., Gargon E., Tugwell P. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012; 13:132.
Meher S., Alfirevic Z. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review. BJOG 2014; doi: 10.1111/ 1471-0528.
Williamson P.R., Altman D.G., Blazeby J.M., Clarke M., Gargon E. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative. Trials 2011; 12(Suppl 1): A70.

Supplementary Files

Action

1. JATS XML