Options for preparing the cervix uteri for childbirth
- Authors: Brega Y.S.1, Pekarev O.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: No 7 (2017)
- Pages: 136-139
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/247991
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.7.136-9
- ID: 247991
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Objective. To carry out a systematic analysis of the data available in the literature on possible methods for preparing the cervix uteri for childbirth and to identify possible complications due to the application of cervical preparation methods. Material and methods. The review included the data of Russian and foreign articles given in Pubmed on this topic. Results. This review sets forth current methods for preparing the cervix uteri for childbirth, as well as the possible risks associated with their use. Conclusion. The data of the conducted investigation confirm the need to search for more effective methods or a combination of already existing ones of cervical preparation for childbirth.
Full Text
About the authors
Yevgeny Sergeyevich Brega
Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: e_brega@oparina4.ru
obstetrician-gynecologist
Oleg Grigorievich Pekarev
Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: o_pekarev@oparina4.ru
MD, professor, deputy chief physician
References
- Баев О.Р., Румянцева В.П., Кан Н.Е., Тетруашвили Н.К., Тютюнник В.Л., Ходжаева З.С., Адамян Л.В., Сухих Г.Т. Подготовка шейки матки к родам и родовозбуждение. Клинический протокол. М.; 2012. [Baev O.R., Rumyantseva V.P., Kan N.E., Tetruashvili N.K., Tyutyunnik V.L., Khodzhaeva Z.S., Adamyan L.V., Sukhikh G.T. Preparation of the cervix for childbirth and induction. Clinical protocol. Moscow; 2012. (in Russian)]
- Айламазян Э.К., Кулаков В.И., Радзинский В.Е., Савельева Г.М., ред. Акушерство. Национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2014. [Aylamazyan E.K., Kulakov V.I., Radzinsky V.E., Savel’eva G.M., ed. Obstetrics. National guideline. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2014. (in Russian)]
- Bishop E.H. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet. Gynecol. 1964; 24(2): 266-8.
- Глаголева Е.А. Подготовка шейки матки к родам (сравнительная эффективность применения динопростона, дилапана и натуральных ламинарий): автореф. дисс.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2000. [Glagoleva E.A. Preparation of the cervix for labor (comparative efficacy of dinoproston, dilapane and natural laminaria): Abstract. Diss.. cand. med. sciences. Moscow; 2000. (in Russian)]
- Баев О.Р., Румянцева В.П., Бурдули Г.М., Полянчикова О.Л., Рубцова С.В. Прогностические факторы эффективности мифепристона в подготовке к родам. Акушерство и гинекология. 2011; 8: 91-4.
- Bruckner T.A., Cheng Y. W., Caughey A.B. Increased neonatal mortality among normal-weight births beyond 41 weeks of gestation in California. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 199(4): 421. e1-7. doi: 10.1016/ j.ajog.2008.05.015.
- Тысячный О.В., Баев О.Р., Кречетова Л.В. Течение и исходы родов в зависимости от тактики ведения при пролонгированной беременности. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 7: 28-33.
- Jozwiak M., Bloemenkamp K.W., Kelly A.J., Mol B.W., Irion O., Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012; (3): CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub2.
- Roztocil A., Pilka L., Jelinek J., Koudelka M., Miklica J. A comparison of three preinduction cervical priming methods: Prostaglandin E2 gel, Dilapan-S rods and Estradiol gel. Ceska Gynekol. 1998; 63(1): 3-9.
- Hruban L., Janku P., Simetka O., Michalec I., Vlk R., Zdhumensky J. et al. Toman A., Doubek R., Rousarova K. Effectiveness and safety of the osmotic dilator Dilapan-S for cervical ripening in females with/without C. section in medical history. In: 24th European eongress of perinatal medicine. June 2014, Florence, Italy.
- Durie D., Lawal A., Zegelbone P. Other mechanical methods for pre-induction cervical ripening. Semin. Perinatol. 2015; 39(6): 444-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.006.
- Krammer J., O’Brien W.F. Mechanical methods of cervical ripening Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995; 38(2): 280-6.
- Norström A., Bryman I., Hansson H.A. Cervical dilatation by Lamicel before first trimester abortion: a clinical and experimental study Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1988; 95(4): 372-6.
- Никонов А.П., Липман А.Д., Чилова Р.А., Остроумов О.А., Ищенко А.И. Искусственное прерывание беременности в поздние сроки методом расширения шейки матки и одномоментного удаления плодного яйца. АГ-инфо. 2008; 1: 18-20.
- Vlk R., Hruban L., Janku P., Simetka O., Michalec I., Zdhumensky J. et al. Efficacy and safety of the osmotic dilator Dilapan-S for cervical ripening in women with/without C. section. In: 13rd World congress in fetal medicine. June-July 2014, Nice, France.
- Drunecky T., Reidingerovd M., Plisovd M., Dudic M., Gdovinovd D., Stoy V. Experimental comparison of properties of natural and synthetic osmotic dilators. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015; 292(2): 349-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3623-3.
- Hoopmann M., Hirneth J., Pauluschke-Fröhlich J., Yazdi B., Abele H., Wallwiener D., Kagan K.O. Influence of mifepristone in induction time for terminations in the second and third trimester. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014; 74(4): 350-4.
- Wildschut H., Both M.I., Medema S., Thomee E., Wildhagen M.F., Kapp N. Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011; (1): CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216. pub2.
- Hapangama D., Neilson J.P. Mifepristone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009; (3): CD002865.
- Alfirevic Z., Keeney E., Dowswell T., Welton N.J., Dias S., Jones L.V. et al. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network metaanalysis. BMJ. 2015; 350: h217.
- Mozurkewich E.L., Chilimigras J.L., Berman D.R., Perni U.C., Romero V.C., King V.J., Keeton K.L. Methods of induction of labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011; 11: 84.
- Dharmavijaya M.N., Umashankar K.M., Kavitha G., Abed Gulab Nagure. Comparative study of intra-cervical Foleys catheter and PGE2 gel for preinduction ripening Int. J. Basic Appl. Med. Sci. 2013; 3(1): 247-53.
- Chen W., Xue J., Peprah M.K., Wen S.W., Walker M., Gao Y., Tang Y. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016; 123(3): 346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456.
Supplementary files
