Features of medical care for gestational diabetes mellitus (in case of a specialized obstetric hospital)


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the efficiency of methodological approaches to optimizing the care of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) under the present-day conditions of a progressive increase in the incidence of this disease in case of a specialized obstetric hospital. Materials and methods. The statistical data on the 2015-2016 activities of the Outpatient Department and the Maternity Department, Moscow City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Nine, were retrospectively analyzed. Results. GDM was diagnosed in two thirds of the pregnant women at more than 30 weeks’ gestation in primary outpatient care services. In the management of pregnant women with untimely detected GDM, the sensitivity of ultrasound fetometry using the specific markers of diabetic fetopathy (DF) was 65.5%. Programmed labor (PL) was one of the leading methods during childbirth. Conclusion. Ultrasound fetometry using specific markers for DF and the strict continuity of outpatient and inpatient care permitted the frequency of DF to be reduced about 1.5-fold. The use of PL methods in GDM contributed to a two-fold decrease in the cesarean delivery rate without deteriorating the perinatal outcomes of labor.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Viktor Evseevich Radzinsky

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: radzinsky@mail.ru
Doctor of Medicine, professor, Honored Researcher of the Russian Federation, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vice-president of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Perinatology Course of the Medical Institute of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, subdivision of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia; Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine of the Advanced Medical Training Faculty of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.

Olga Viuhlenovna Papysheva

N.E. Bauman City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Nine, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: viulen@mail.ru
Ph.D., Head Physician

Larisa Nikolaevna Esipova

N.E. Bauman City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Nine, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: larisaesipova1@mail.ru
Deputy Head Physician for Obstetrics and Gynecology

Nadezhda Mikhailovna Startseva

N.E. Bauman City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Nine, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: n.startseva@yohoo.com
Doctor of Medicine, Head of Pathologic Pregnancy Department

Galina Aleksandrovna Kotaish

N.E. Bauman City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Nine, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: suslatinl@mail.ru
Ph.D., obstetrician-gynecologist

References

  1. Бурумкулова Ф.Ф., Петрухин В.А. Гестационный сахарный диабет: вчера, сегодня, завтра. Терапевтический архив. 2014; 86(10): 109-15.
  2. Billionnet C., Mitanchez D., Weill A., Nizard J., Alla F., Hartemann A. et al. Gestational diabetes and adverse perinatal outcomes from 716,152 births in France in 2012. Diabetologia. 2017; 60(4): 636-44. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4206-6.
  3. Regnault N., Salanave B., Castetbon K., Cosson E., Vambergue A., Barry Y. et al. Diabète gestationnel en France en 2012: dépistage, prévalence et modalités de prise en charge pendant la grossese. Bull. Epidémiol. Hebd. 2016; 9: 164-72.
  4. Башмакова Н.В., Дерябина Е.Г., ред. Гестационный сахарный диабет. Что мы знаем о нем сегодня? Екатеринбург; 2015. 124c.
  5. Гестационный сахарный диабет: диагностика, лечение, послеродовое наблюдение. Клинические рекомендации (протокол). М.; 2014: 18.
  6. Дедов И.И., Краснопольский В.И., Сухих Г.Т. от имени рабочей группы. Российский национальный консенсус «Гестационный сахарный диабет: диагностика, лечение, послеродовое наблюдение». Сахарный диабет. 2012; 4: 4-10.
  7. Kautzky-Willer A., Harreiter J., Bancher-Todesca D., Berger A., Repa A., Lechleitner M. et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2016; 128(Suppl. 2): 103-12. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0941-1.
  8. Краснопольский В.И., Логутова Л.С., Петрухин В.А., Чечнева М.А., Бурумкулова Ф.Ф., Гурьева В.М., Лысенко С.Н., Коваленко Т.С., Аксенов А.Н., Троицкая М.В., Котов Ю.Б., Ермакова Л.Б. Антенатальная ультразвуковая диагностика диабетической фетопатии и макросомии. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2014; 14(2): 87-93.
  9. Ордынский В.Ф. Значение ультразвукового обследования беременных с сахарным диабетом. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2014; 6: 56-70.
  10. Buhling K.J., Doll I., Siebert G., Catalano P.M. Relationship between sonographically estimated fetal subcutaneous adipose tissue measurements and neonatal skinfold measurements. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 39(5): 558-62.
  11. Прозоров В.В., Есипова Л.Н., Старцева Н.М., Девятова Е.А., Дочкина А.И., Никифорова Я.Б. Программированные роды как метод родоразрешения пациенток с гестационным сахарным диабетом. В. кн.: Тезисы IX Общероссийского семинара «Репродуктивный потенциал России: версии и контраверсии». 10-13 ноября 2016, Сочи. М.: Status Praesens; 2016: 89-91.
  12. Ehrenberg H.M., Durnwald C.P., Catalano P., Mercer B.M. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the risk of cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 191(3): 969-74.
  13. Литвиненко И.А., Карпова Е.В., Оразмурадов А.А., Шешко П.Л. Особенности гестации и состояния плода у беременных с ГСД, выявленным в I. триместре беременности. В. кн.: Материалы IV Всероссийской конференции с международным участием «Медико-физиологические проблемы экологии человека». Ульяновск, 26-30 сентября 2011. Ульяновск: УлГУ; 2011: 138-9.
  14. Du M.K., Ge L. Y., Zhou M.L., Ying J., Qu F., Dong M. et al. Effects of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on neonatal birth weight. J. Zhejiang. Univ. Sci. B. 2017; 18(3): 263-71. doi: 10.1631/ jzus.B1600204.
  15. Михалев Е.В., Шанина О.М., Саприна Т.В. Гормональные, электролитные нарушения и особенности гемостаза у доношенных новорожденных детей от матерей с гестационным сахарным диабетом. Сахарный диабет. 2015; 1: 78-86.
  16. Erjavec K., Poljicanin T., Matijevic R. Impact of the Implementation of New WHO diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus on prevalence and perinatal outcomes: a population-based study. J Pregnancy. 2016; 2016: 2670912. doi: 10.1155/2016/2670912.
  17. Boriboonhirunsarn D., Waiyanikorn R. Emergency cesarean section rate between women with gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 55(1): 64-7. doi: 10.1016/ j.tjog.2015.08.024.
  18. Grabowska K., Stapinska-Syniec A., Saletra A., Jarmuzek P., Bomba-Opon D. Labour in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Ginekol. Pol. 2017; 88(2): 81-6. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0016.
  19. Derulle P. Quoi de neuf dans la prise en charge de la macrosomia? Ginecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2015; 43(9): 616-8.
  20. Gaudet L., Wen S.W., Walker M. The combined effect of maternal obesity and fetal macrisomia on pregnancy outcomes. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2014; 36(9): 776-84.
  21. Inocêncio G., Braga A., Lima T., Vieira B., Zulmira R., Carinhas M. et al. Which factors influence the type of delivery and cesarean section rate in women with gestational diabetes? J. Reprod. Med. 2015; 60(11-12): 529-34.
  22. Alberico S., Erenbourg A., Hod M., Yogev Y., Hadar E., Neri F. et al. Immediate delivery or expectant management in gestational diabetes at term: the GINEXMAL randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017; 124(4): 669-77. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14389.
  23. Marchiano D., Elkousy M., Stevens E., Peipert J., Macones G. Diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus does not influence the success rates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 190(3):790-6.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2018 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies