A tissue-engineered construct based on polydioxanone and multipotent stromal cells for plastic surgery repair of abdominal cavity and pelvic floor defects


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study the safety and efficiency of transplantation of the developed tissue-engineered prosthesis based on polydioxanone and cultured multipotent stromal cells (MSC) from the umbilical cord. Material and methods. In vivo biocompatibility of prostheses was evaluated in outbred rats, by modeling a full-layer defect of the anterior abdominal wall, the edges of which was sutured with a polydioxanone prosthesis that was unpopulated and populated by the cultured cells. A prosthesis based on the decellularized dermis (Permacol) was used in the comparison group. The animals were withdrawn from the experiment at 3, 10, 30, 60, and 180 days after surgery. Macroscopic, tensiometric, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical studies were conducted. Results. The polydioxanone-based prostheses were found to be more effectively integrated and grow their own tissues. The biomechanical properties of tissues in the field of transplantation in the long-term periods did not differ between the groups and the native tissue of the anterior abdominal wall. When a tissue-engineered construct was transplanted, there was a lower inflammatory response due to macrophage M2 polarization, as well as a more pronounced angiogenesis. The transplanted cells did not differentiate into blood vessel cells and were totally eliminated by a recipient’s macrophages. The registered effects appeared to be shown via paracrine mechanisms. Conclusion. The addition of cultured MSCs to the prosthesis could substantially reduce the severity of an inflammatory response to rejection of a foreign body and stimulate angiogenesis and the rate of replacement by the recipient’s own tissues.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maria V. Grinberg

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: drmgrinberg@gmail.com
assistent of cytology, embryology and histology department, medical faculty

Irina V. Arutyunyan

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Research Institute of Human Morphology

Email: labrosta@yandex.ru
researcher

Larisa V. Tsedik

Powder Metallurgy Institute

Email: tslara@rambler.ru
researcher Minsk, Belarus

Andrei V. Makarov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Research Institute of Human Morphology

Email: anvitmak@yandex.ru
PhD, senior researcher

Andrei V. Elchaninov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Research Institute of Human Morphology

Email: elchandrey@yandex.ru
Ph.D, senior researcher

Anastasia V. Lokhonina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: nastya.serbsky@gmail.com
junior researcher

Timur H. Fathudinov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: tfat@yandex.ru
Ph.D, chief; chief of cytology, embryology and histology department, medical faculty

References

  1. Lak K.L., Goldblatt M.I. Mesh selection in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018; 142(3,Suppl.: Current concepts in abdominal wall reconstruction): 99S-106S.
  2. Filisetti C., Costanzo S., Marinoni F., Vella C., Klercy C., Riccipetitoni G. Effectiveness and properties of the biological prosthesis Permacol™ in pediatric surgery: A large single center experience. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.). 2016; 7: 48-54.
  3. Fatkhudinov T., Tsedik L., Arutyunyan I., Lokhonina A., Makarov A., Korshunov A., Elchaninov A., Kananykhina E., Vasyukova O., Usman N., Uvarova E., Chuprynin V., Eremina I., Degtyarev D., Sukhikh G. Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2018; Aug. 9.
  4. Darehzereshki A., Goldfarb M., Zehetner J., Moazzez A., Lipham J.C., Mason R.J., Katkhouda N. Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J. Surg. 2014; 38(1): 40-50.
  5. Majumder A., Winder J.S., Wen Y., Pauli E.M., Belyansky I., Novitsky Y.W. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Surgery. 2016; 160(4): 828-38.
  6. Liu M., Luo G., Wang Y., He W., Liu T., Zhou D. et al. Optimization and integration of nanosilver on polycaprolactone nanofibrous mesh for bacterial inhibition and wound healing in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2017; 12: 6827-40.
  7. Hallberg H., Lewin R., Elander A., Hansson E. TIGR J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg. 2018; 52(4): 253-8.
  8. Olson M.T., Singhal S., Panchanathan R., Roy S.B., Kang P., Ipsen T. et al. Primary paraesophageal hernia repair with Gore Bio-A tissue reinforcement: long-term outcomes and association of BMI and recurrence. Surg. Endosc. 2018; May 14.
  9. Roth J.S., Anthone G.J., Selzer D.J., Poulose B.K., Bittner J.G., Hope W.W., Dunn R.M. Prospective evaluation of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh in CDC class I/high-risk ventral and incisional hernia repair: 18-month follow-up. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32(4): 1929-36.
  10. Kuroda Y., Asada R., So K., Yonezawa A., Nankaku M., Mukai K. et al. A pilot study of regenerative therapy using controlled release of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor for patients with pre-collapse osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Int. Orthop. 2016; 40(8): 1747-54.
  11. Zhang Q., Hubenak J., Iyyanki T., Alred E., Turza K.C., Davis G. et al. Engineering vascularized soft tissue flaps in an animal model using human adipose-derived stem cells and VEGF+PLGA/PEG microspheres on a collagen-chitosan scaffold with a flow-through vascular pedicle. Biomaterials. 2015; 73: 198-213.
  12. Schon L.C., Gill N., Thorpe M., Davis J., Nadaud J., Kim J. et al. Efficacy of a mesenchymal stem cell loaded surgical mesh for tendon repair in rats. J. Transl. Med. 2014; 12: 110.
  13. Арутюнян И.В., Ельчанинов А.В., Фатхудинов Т.Х., Макаров А.В., Кананыхина Е., Большакова Г.Б., Гпинкина В.В., Гольдштейн Д.В., Сухих Г.Т. Элиминация РКН26-меченных ММСК при аллогенной трансплантации. Гены и клетки. 2014; 9(3-1): 45-52.
  14. Costa R.G., Lontra M.B., Scalco P., Cavazzola L.T., Gurski R.R. Polylactic acid film versus acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa mesh in peritoneal adhesion formation in rats. Acta Cir. Bras. 2009; 24(2): 128-35.
  15. Васюкова О.А., Арутюнян И.В., Цедик Л.В., Коршунов А.А., Ельчанинов А.В., Кананыхина Е.Ю., Лохонина А.В., Макаров А.В., Уварова Е.В., Чупрынин В.Д., Еремина И.З., Фатхудинов Т.Х. Исследование биосовместимости резорбируемых сетчатых протезов для пластики дефектов брюшной стенки и дна малого таза. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 12: 96-105.
  16. Arutyunyan I., Elchaninov A., Eatkhudinov T., Makarov A., Kananykhina E., Usman N., Bolshakova G., Glinkina V., Goldshtein D., Sukhikh G. Elimination of allogeneic multipotent stromal cells by host macrophages in different models of regeneration. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015; 8(5): 4469-80.
  17. Mills C.D. M1 and M2 macrophages: oracles of health and disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2012; 32(6): 463-88.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies