DIFFICULTIES AND ERRORS IN THE PREHOSPITAL DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The problem in the prehospital diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in women is due to a significant frequency of errors and, as a consequence, delayed hospitalization for surgical treatment. Reducing diagnostic errors mainly in the prehospital stage can improve the quality of care for patients with EP. Objective. To analyze the errors of prehospital EP diagnosis and to optimize the latter. Subjects and methods. The quality of medical care was retrospectively analyzed in 194 patients with EP. By taking into account the identified defects, the authors elaborated an optimized approach to providing outpatient care for patients with EP and evaluated its efficiency in 332patients with suspected EP. Results. Unavailability of β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) test results at the first visit is a main defect in medical care for patients with EP at the prehospital stage. The laboratory diagnosis of pregnancy, which complies with established standards and is based on serum β-hCG determination, does not meet the requirements for emergency outpatient care since it does not ensure the availability of the result at the same visit. The optimized approach increases the diagnosis of EP from 27.1 to 76.1% at the first visit. Conclusion. The correct diagnosis made on the day of a patient visit is a significant reserve to reduce severe and complicated cases.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Igor B. Manukhin

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

MD, professor, head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine Moscow 127473, Delegatskaya str. 20/1, Russia

Sevilla Savelievna Ramazanova

Khimki Central Clinical Hospital

obstetrician-gynecologist Moscow Region, Moscow 141401, Kurkinskoe Highway, 11, Russia

Sergey Viktorovich Firichenko

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: Firichenko@mail.ru
MD, associate professor of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine Moscow 127473, Delegatskaya str. 20/1, Russia

Svetlana Olegovna Smirnova

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

MD, associate professor of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine Moscow 127473, Delegatskaya str. 20/1, Russia

References

  1. Zhang Y.L., Sun J., Su Y.C., Guo Y.H., Sun Y.P. Study on the incidence and influences on etopic pregnancy from embryo transfer of fresh cycles and frozen-thawed cycles. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012; 47(9): 655-8.
  2. Lee R., Dupuis C., Chen B., Smith A., Kim Y.H. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy in the emergency setting. Ultrasonography. 2018; 37(1): 78-87.
  3. Радзинский В.Е. Акушерская агрессия v. 2.0. М.: Status Praesens; 2017. [Radzinsky V.E. Obstetric aggression v. 2.0. Moscow: Status Praesens; 2017. (in Russian)]
  4. Huancahuari N. Emergencies in early pregnancy. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. 2012; 30(4): 837-47.
  5. Barnhart K.T. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009; 361(4): 379-87.
  6. van Mello N.M., Mol F., Opmeer B.C., Ankum W.M., Barnhart K., Coomarasamy A. et al. Diagnostic value of serum hCG on the outcome of pregnancy of unknown location: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2012; 18(6): 603-17.
  7. Berger P., Sturgeon C. Pregnancy testing with hCG--future prospects. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014; 25(12): 637-48.
  8. Hochman E., Elami-Suzin M., Soferman H.G., Galil T., Hershkovitz Y., Tzur D. et al. Early pregnancy confirmation--the role of urine pregnancy test in military primary care clinics. Mil. Med. 2012; 177(8): 947-51.
  9. Min J., Buckel C., Secura G.M., Peipert J.F., Madden T. Performance of a checklist to exclude pregnancy at the time of contraceptive initiation among women with a negative urine pregnancy test. Contraception. 2015; 91(1): 80-4.
  10. Чертовских М.Н., Флоренсова Е.В., Кулинич С.И. Возможные пути улучшения диагностики трубной беременности в плане выполнения органосохраняющих операций. Сибирский медицинский журнал. 2009; 7: 104-7.
  11. Каушанская Л.В., Салов И.А. Современные технологии в диагностике внематочной беременности на госпитальном этапе. Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2009; 5(4): 537-40
  12. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения России от 07.11.2012 N 589н „Об утверждении стандарта специализированной медицинской помощи при внематочной (эктопической) беременности”
  13. Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родовспоможения в Российской Федерации. М.: МЗ РФ; 2016.
  14. Милованов А.П., ред. Анализ причин материнской смертности. Руководство для врачей. М.: МВД; 2008. 228с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies