Embryo quality assessment by the small noncoding RNA expression profile in an embryo culture medium in assisted reproductive technology programs


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To investigate of the small noncoding RNA (sncRNA) (microRNA and piwiRNA) prof ile in an embryo culture medium on day 4 of cultivation to identify the potential biomarkers for embryo quality. Materials and methods. The deep sequencing method was used to identify the spectrum of sncRNA present in the blastocyst cavity and embryo culture medium, which were quantified using a real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay in 48 samples of the culture medium of embryos transferred into the uterine cavity. Results. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to analyze the contribution of six sncRNAs to determining the embryo quality, which was characterized by the variable importance in projection (VIP) values. The analysis showed that the greatest contribution was made by four sncRNAs: piR020401 (VIP = 1.46027), let-7c-5p (VIP = 1.17416), let-7b-5p (VIP = 0.994657), and let-7i-5p (VIP = 0.942665), and the smallest contribution was by miR-143-5p (VIP = 0.623108) and miR-92a-3p (VIP = 0.471951). The Spearman rank correlation method was used to reveal a statistically significant correlation between the expression level of sncRNA (hsa-let-7b-5p, hsa-let-7c-5p, and hsa-piR020401) in the culture medium and the quality of the embryo transferred to the uterine cavity. The Mann- Whitney non-parametric test revealed statistically signif icant differences in the expression level of piR020401 and miR-92a-3p in the culture medium of embryos forming groups according to morphofunctional parameters. Conclusion. The sncRNAs (let-7c-5p, let- 7b-5p,piR020401) found in the culture medium statistically significantly correlate with embryo morphofunctional characteristics on day 4 after fertilization, among which piR020401 makes the greatest contribution to determining the embryo quality. The expression level of miR-92a-3p and piR020401 in the culture medium depends on the stage of embryonic development, differentiating the morula and blastocyst stage. Considering that the lag in the embryonic development rate by day 5 of cultivation did not always predetermine the absence of embryo implantation into the uterus, it is not advisable to focus exclusively on embryo morphological parameters when choosing a candidate for transfer to the uterus, and it is recommended that the expression profile of let-7c-5p, let-7b-5p, miR-92a-3p, andpiR020401 should be additionally estimated on day 4 of embryo cultivation. Thus, the findings make it possible to optimize the choice of an embryo and to implement an assisted reproductive technology program.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Angelika Vladimirovna Timofeeva

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: avtimofeeva28@gmail.com
PhD, Chief of the Laboratory of Transcriptomic at the Department of Systems Biology in Reproduction

Elena Anatolievna Kalinina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: e_kalinina@oparina4.ru
MD, Associate Professor, Chief of the Department of Reproductive Health named after professor Leonov

Yulia Sergeevna Drapkina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: julia.drapkina@gmail.com
PhD student at the Department of Reproductive Health named after professor Leonov

Vitaliy Viktorovich Chagovets

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: vvchagovets@gmail.com
PhD, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Proteomics and Metabolomics in Human Reproduction at the Department of Systems Biology in Reproduction

Nataliya Petrovna Makarova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: npmakarova@gmail.com
PhD, senior embriologist at the Department of Reproductive Health named after professor Leonov

Gennady Tikhonovich Sukhikh

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: gtsukhih@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Director

References

  1. Сухих Г.Т., Назаренко Т.А., ред. Бесплодный брак. Современные подходы к диагностике и лечению. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2010 518c.
  2. Корсак В.С., Смирнова А.А., Шурыгина О.В. ВРТ в России. Отчет за 2013 год. Регистр ВРТ. СПб.: Российская Ассоциация Репродукции Человека; 2015: 26-9.
  3. Gardner D.K., Balaban B. Assessment of human embryo development using morpho-logical criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and ‘OMICS’: is looking good still important? Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2016; 22(10): 704-18.
  4. Rocha J.C., Passalia F., Matos F.D., Maserati M.P. Jr., Alves M.F., Almeida T.G. et al. Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard? JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2016; 20(3): 150-8.
  5. Кулакова Е.В., Калинина Е.А., Трофимов Д.Ю., Макарова Н.П., Хечумян Л.Р., Дударова А.Х. Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии у супружеских пар с высоким риском генетических нарушений. Преимплантационный генетический скрининг. Акушерство и гинекология. 2017; 8: 21-7.
  6. Драпкина Ю.С., Тимофеева А.В., Чаговец В.В., Кононихин А. С., Франкевич В.Е., Калинина Е.А. Применение омиксных технологий в решении проблем репродуктивной медицины. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018; 9: 24-32.
  7. Kropp J., Salih S., Khatib H. Expression of microRNAs in bovine and human pre-implantation embryo culture media. Front. Genet. 2014; 5: 91.
  8. Gilchrist G., Tscherner A., Nalpathamkalam T., Merico D., LaMarre J. MicroRNA expression during bovine oocyte maturation and fertilization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016; 17(3): 396.
  9. Houwing S., Kamminga L., Berezikov E., Cronembold D., Girard A., Elst H. et al. A role for Piwi and piRNAs in germ cell maintenance and transposon silencing in Zebrafish. Cell. 2007; 129(1): 69-82.
  10. Rosenbluth E., Shelton D., Sparks A., Devor E., Christenson L., Van Voorhis B. MicroRNA expression in the human blastocyst. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 99(3): 855-61. e3.
  11. Roth L.W., McCallie B., Alvero R., Schoolcraft W.B., Minjarez, D., Katz-Jaffe M. Altered microRNA and gene expression in the follicular fluid of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2014; 31(3): 355-62.
  12. Capalbo A., Ubaldi F.M., Cimadomo D., Noli L., Khalaf Y., Farcomeni A. et al. MicroRNAs in spent blastocyst culture medium are derived from trophectoderm cells and can be explored for human embryo reproductive competence assessment. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 105(1): 225-35. e1-3.
  13. Liang J., Wang S., Wang Z. Role of microRNAs in embryo implantation. Reprod Biol. Endocrinol. 2017; 15(1): 90.
  14. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/ и программу RStudio
  15. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio. Boston, MA: RStudio Inc.; 2016. Available at: http://www.rstudio.com/
  16. Wold S., Sjostrom M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001; 58(2): 109-30.
  17. Ruiz-Alonso M., Blesa D., Diaz-Gimeno P., Gomez E., Fernandez-Sanchez M., Carranza F. et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 100(3): 818-24.
  18. Altmae S., Koel M., Vosa U., Adler P., Suhorutsenko M., Laisk-Podar T. et al. Meta-signature of human endometrial receptivity: a meta-analysis and validation study of transcriptomic biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7(1): 10077.
  19. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Performing the embryo transfer: a guideline. 2013.
  20. Evans J., Hannan N.J., Edgell T.A., Vollenhoven B.J., Lutjen P.J., Osianlis T. et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2014; 20(6): 808-21.
  21. Roque М., Valle М., Guimaraes F, Sampaio М., Geber S. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2015; 103(5): 1190-3.
  22. Bashiri A., Halper K.I., Orvieto R. Recurrent implantation failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018; 16(1): 121.
  23. Смольникова В.Ю., Калинина E.A., Краснощока O.E, Донников A.E., Бурменская О.В., Трофимов Д.Ю., Сухих Г.Т. Возможности неинвазивной оценки состояния ооцита и эмбриона при проведении программ ВРТ по профилю экспрессии мРНК факторов роста в фолликулярной жидкости. Акушерство и гинекология. 2014; 9: 36-43.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies