Features of formation of the activity-dormancy cycle in fetuses with growth restriction and developmental delay


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study and compare the parameters of the activity-dormancy cycle in fetuses having various degrees of growth restriction in the presence and absence of disorders of placental circulation in the third trimester of pregnancy. Subjects and methods. The presence and components of the activity-dormancy cycle were assessed in the fetuses of 43 women with singleton pregnancy at 34/35 weeks and at fetometric values below the 10th percentile. All the women underwent great artery Doppler studies in the mother-placenta-fetus functional system. According to the presence and absence of impaired placental hemodynamics, the pregnant women were divided into 2 groups. Groups 1 and 2 contained 33 and 10 fetuses, respectively. The newborn infants were divided according to the severity of hypotrophy, by using the tables proposed by G.M. Dementieva et al. (1984). Results. The activity-dormancy cycle was formed only in 33% of the fetuses in Group 1 and in 40% of those in Group 2. Half of these fetuses were found to have grades 2 and 3 hypotrophy; the remaining fetuses had grade 1 hypotrophy. The duration of dormancy in the cycle was reduced equally by 40%, and the amplitude of the heart rate and motor-cardiac reflex decreased by 50% and 19% in the fetuses of Groups 1 and 2 women, respectively, as compared with in the fetuses of healthy women during physiological pregnancy. There was an inverse correlation between the duration of dormancy in the activity-dormancy cycle and the severity of neonatal hypotrophy (r = -0.35; p = 0.05). It was found that the more severe disorders of placental circulation were observed, the less frequently the fetal activity-dormancy cycle was formed (r = -0.39; p = 0.021). Conclusion. The activity-dormancy cycle and its parameters can serve as qualitative and quantitative criteria for growth restriction and developmental delay in fetuses having prenatal fetometric values between the 5th and 10th percentiles. The integrated approach to prenatal diagnosis of growth restriction and developmental delay will be able to adequately assess fetal adaptive capabilities when planning the timing and mode of delivery.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nataliya G. Pavlova

Acad. I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: ngp05@yandex.ru
MD, professor of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology 197022 Russia, St. Petersburg, ul. Leo Tolstoy, d. 6-8

Sholpan D. Dyusembinova

Acad. I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: sholpan8-d@mail.ru
doctor of ultrasound diagnostics, St. Petersburg GBUZ “Maternity hospital number 6 prof. V.F. Snegireva “ 197022 Russia, St. Petersburg, ul. Leo Tolstoy, d. 6-8

References

  1. Baschat A.A. Fetal growth restriction - from observation to intervention. J Perinat Med. 2010; 38(3): 239-46. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2010.041
  2. Демина Т.Н. Тактика ведения пациенток группы риска по возникновению синдрома задержки развития плода. Медико-социальные проблемы семьи. 2000; 5(4): 92-5.
  3. Cruz-Lemini M, Crispi F., Van Mieghem T., Pedraza D., Cruz-Martinez R., Acosta-Rojas R, Figueras F., Parra-Cordero M, Deprest J., Gratacos E. Risk of perinatal death in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction according to gestational age and cardiovascular Doppler indices: a multicenter study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012; 32(1-2): 116-22. doi: 10.1159/000333001
  4. Jugovic D. New Dopler index for prediction of perinatal brain damage in growth-restricted and hypoxic fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 30: 303-11. doi: 10.1002/uog.4094
  5. Manning F.A. The Alpha-Omega Theory: The Prenatal Original of Postnatal Diseases. OBS Management. 2000; 12(10): 30-45.
  6. Flamant C, Gascoin G. Short-term outcome and small for gestational age newborn management. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013; 42(8): 98595.2013. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.014
  7. Павлова Н.Г., Аржанова О.Н., Зайнулина М.С., ред. Плацентарная недостаточность: учебно-методическое пособие. СПб.: Изд-во Н-Л, 2007. 27 с.
  8. Vasak B, Koenen S.V, Koster M.P., Hukkelhoven C.W., Franx A., Hanson M.A., Visser G.H. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45(2): 162-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14644
  9. Obido A.O., Patel K.R., Spitalnik A., Obico L., Huettner P. Placental pathology, first-trimester biomarkers and adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Perinatol. 2014; 34: 186-91. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.176
  10. Павлова Н.Г. Значение экспериментально-клинического подхода к изучению взаимодействий в функциональной системе мать-плацента-плод. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2010; 5: 7-10.
  11. Белич А.И. Эволюционный подход к изучению становления ЦНС плода. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2010; 5: 12-6.
  12. Дементьева Г.М., Короткова Е.В. Оценка физического развития новорожденного. М., 1984.
  13. Павлова Н.Г. Антенатальная диагностика, профилактика и лечение функциональных нарушений развития центральной нервной системы плода: дис.. д-ра мед. наук. СПб., 2000: 143-147.
  14. Nardozza L.M., Caetano A.C., Zamarian A.C., Mazzola J.B., Silva C.P., Marçal V.M., Lobo T.F., Peixoto A.B. Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge. Araujo Jünior E. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295(5): 1061-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4341-9
  15. Тимохина Е.В. Синдром задержки роста плода: патогенез, прогнозирование, акушерская тактика: автореферат дис.. д-ра мед. наук. М., 2012. 48 с.
  16. Копылова Ю.В. Роль проангиогенных и антиангиогенных факторов в развитии плацентарной недостаточности: автореферат дис.. кандидата мед.наук. М., 2014. 24 с.
  17. Clausson B., Gardosi J., Francis A., Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG. 2001; 108(8): 830-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00205.x
  18. Gordijn S.J., Beune I.M., Thilaganathan B., Papageorghiou A., Baschat A.A., Baker P.N., Silver R.M., Wynia K., Ganzevoort W. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48(3): 333-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15884.
  19. Bakalis S., Akolekar R., Gallo D.M., Poon L.C., Nicolaides K.H. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 30-34 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45(4): 409-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.14822.
  20. Figueras F., Eixarch E., Meier E., Iraola A., Figueras J., Puerto B., Gratacos E. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur Obstet Gyneco Reprod Biol. 2008; 136(1): 34-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.016

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies