Clinical cases of an adverse birth outcome of amniotic fluid embolism


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Amniotic fluid embolism, or anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy, is a formidable pregnancy complication that frequently results in death. The mortality rates amount to as much as 80%. This pathology accounts for 1.2 to 16.5% in the structure of maternal mortality. The risk factors may include age of over 30 years in a parturient woman; multiple pregnancy; overly strong delivery; cesarean section; uterine rupture; cervical tears; premature placental abruption; intrauterine asphyxia; and abdominal trauma. However, even the absence of risk factors does not rule out the possibility of amniotic fluid embolism. Clinical case report. The paper describes two clinical cases of fatal amniotic fluid embolism, which demonstrate the specific features of the course of this complication in the presence and absence of risk factors. Conclusion. Unfortunately, to date there are no clear predictors for amniotic fluid embolism that should alert the obstetricians/gynecologists when managing labor and delivery in any-risk patients.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mikhail M. Padrul

Academician E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m-padrul@mail.ru
MD, professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 614990, Russia, Perm, ul. Petropavlovskaya, d. 26

Gulnara K. Sadykova

Academician E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: gulnara-sadykova@mail.ru
PhD, associate professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 614990, Russia, Perm, ul. Petropavlovskaya, d. 26

Elena V. Turova

Academician E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: elena_turova06@mail.ru
assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 614990, Russia, Perm, ul. Petropavlovskaya, d. 26

References

  1. Савельева Г.М., Сухих Г.Т., Серов В.Н., Радзинский В.Е. Акушерство: национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2018. 1088 с.
  2. Возгомент О.В. О диагностике эмболии околоплодными водами. Трудный пациент. 2016; 2-3.
  3. Макацария А.Д., Панфилова О.Ю. Эмболия околоплодными водами, или анафилактоидный синдром беременности. Практическая медицина. 2010; 43.
  4. Clark S.L., Hankins G.D.V., Dudley D.A., et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1158-67. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91474-9
  5. Clark S.L., Cotton D.D., Gonik B., Greenspoon J., Phelan J.P. Central hemodynamic alterations in amniotic fluid embolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158:1124-26. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90236-0
  6. Clark S.L., Montz F.J., Phelan J.P. Hemodynamic alterations associated with amniotic fluid embolism: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151: 617-21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90150-4
  7. Хорева О.П., Милованов А.П., Ковров К.Н. О патогенезе эмболии околоплодными водами (обзор литературы). Проблемы репродукции. 2006; 3: 73-5.
  8. Константинова О.Д., Мазуровская О.П., Дёмина Л.М. Эмболия околоплодными водами. Ремедиум Приволжье. 2014; 3(123): 24-29.
  9. Dildy G.A., Belfort M.A., Clark S.L. Anaphylactoid Syndrome of Pregnancy (Amniotic Fluid Embolism). Critical Care Obstet. 2010; 466-72. doi: 10.1002/9781444316780.ch35

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies