A Russian nomogram for assessing the risk of metastatic regional lymph node involvement in patients with breast cancer


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To comparatively analyze the Russian nomogram developed at the Ulyanovsk State University (the UlSUnomogram) and the foreign nomogram developed at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (the MSKCC nomogram) for accurately predicting metastatic regional lymph node involvement in the same population of patients with breast cancer (BC). Subjects and methods. The study enrolled 420patients with morphologically verified invasive BC who had been treated at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary or the Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology. At least one metastatic axillary lymph node was diagnosed in 137/420(32.6%) patients. The probability of axillary lymph node metastasis was calculated using the MSKCC nomogram available on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center website (USA) and using the UlSU nomogram. For each nomogram, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed; the integrated assessment of the diagnostic potential of the nomograms was determined by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results. Univariate analysis revealed that primary node tumor size (p = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), total malignancy score (p <0.001), estrogen receptor status (p = 0.025), and HER2 status (p = 0.032) were statistically significantly associated with metastatic regional lymph node involvement in BC patients. Both nomograms showed moderate prediction abilities: the AUC (95% CI) for the UlSU nomogram was 0.669 (0.6141-0.7239); that for the MSKCC nomogram was 0.694 (0.6405-0.7479); the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion. The comparative analysis using the MSKCC nomogram has demonstrated that the UlSU nomogram has equal prognostic value and is more convenient to use.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Valery V. Rodionov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_rodionov@oparina4.ru
MD, professor, Head of the Department of Breast Cancer Department

Vlada V. Kometova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_kometova@oparina4.ru
MD, Senior Researcher, Pathology Department

Sirinya R. Idrisova

Ulyanovsk State University

Email: idrisovasr987232@yandex.ru
Graduate student of Oncology and Radiologist Department

Yury G. Savinov

Ulyanovsk State University

Email: uras@aport.ru
PhD, Associate Professor of Department of Applied Mathematics

Ivan S. Balashov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: fiordmaster@gmail.com
Researcher of Biostatistics Laboratory

Pavel I. Borovikov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: borpi@mail.ru
MD, head of Biostatistics Laboratory

Lev A. Ashrafyan

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: L_Ashrafyan@Oparina4.ru
MD, professor, academician of RAS, Head of the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, Deputy director

References

  1. Родионов В.В. Лимфодиссекция у больных ранним раком молочной железы: за и против (обзор). Креативная онкология и хирургия (электронный журнал). 2012: 24 с.
  2. Lucci A., McCall L.M., Beitsch P.D., Whitworth P.W., Reintgen D.S., Blumencranz P.W., et al. Surgical complications associated with Sentinel Lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J. Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3657-63.
  3. Giuliano A.E., Hunt K.K., Ballman K.V., Beitsch P.D., Whitworth P.W., Blumencranz P.W., et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. A Randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011; 305(6): 569-75.
  4. Langer I., Guller U., Berclaz G., Koechli O.R., Schaer G., Fehr M.K., et al. Morbidity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) alone versus SLN and completion axillary lymph node dissection after breast cancer surgery: a prospective Swiss multicenter study on 569 patients. Ann. Surg. 2007; 245: 452-61.
  5. Choong P.L., deSilva C.J., Dawkins H.J., Sterrett G.F., Robbins P., Harvey J.M., et al. Predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996; 37: 135-49.
  6. Voogd A.C., Coebergh J.W., Repelaer van Driel O.J., Roumen R.M., van Beek H.W., Vreugdenhil A., et al. The risk of nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes: a population-based analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000; 62: 63-9.
  7. Viale G., Zurrida S., Mariorano E., Mazzarol G., Pruneri G., Paganelli G., et al. Predicting the status of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in 4351 patients with invasive breast carcinoma treated in a single institution. Cancer. 2005; 103: 492-500.
  8. U. Rodionov V., Zankin V., Kometova V., Rodionova M. Clinico-pathological predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. The Breast. 2013; 22 (Supp. l): 59-60
  9. Bevilacqua J.L., Kattan M.W., Fey J.V, Cody H.S., Borgen P.I., Van Zee K.J. Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007; 25(24): 3670-9
  10. Klar M., Foeldi M., Markert S., GitschG., Stickeler E., Watermann D. Good prediction of the likelihood for sentinel lymph node metastasis by using the MSKCC nomogram in a German breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009; 16: 1136-42
  11. Qiu P., Liu J., Wang Y., Yang G., Liu Y., Sun X., et al. Risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis and validation study of the MSKCC nomogram in breast cancer patients. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012; 42 (11): 1002-7
  12. Rodionov V., Panchenko S., Voronov Y., Kometova V., Rodionova M. Predicting axillary metastasis in breast cancer patients without axillary surgery: a new nomogram. E.J.C. 2014; 50(Suppl. 2.): S 140
  13. Родионов В.В., Панченко С.В., Идрисова С.Р., Кометова В.В., Савинов Ю.Г. Номограмма для прогнозирования вероятности метастатического поражения регионарных лимфатических узлов у больных раком молочной железы. Вопросы онкологии. 2015; 61(3): 435-8.
  14. Van Zee K.J., Manasseh D.M., Bevilacqua J.L., Boolbol S.K., Fey J.V., Tan L.K., et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann. of Surg. Oncol. 2004; 10(10): 1140-51

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies