Enhancing the efficiency of assisted reproductive technologies using artificial intelligence and machine learning at the embryological stage
- Authors: Sysoeva A.P.1, Makarova N.P.1, Kalinina E.A.1, Skibina J.S.2,3, Zanishevskaya A.A.2,3, Yanchuk N.O.2,3, Gryaznov A.Y.2,3
-
Affiliations:
- Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Research Production Enterprise "Nanostructured Glass Technology"
- International Research Educational Center "Structure-Mediated Nanobiophotonics"
- Issue: No 7 (2020)
- Pages: 28-36
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/248826
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.7.28-36
- ID: 248826
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
About the authors
Anastasia P. Sysoeva
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: sysoeva.a.p@gmail.com
embryologist of the Department of Assistive Technologies in the Treatment of Infertility
Natalya P. Makarova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: np_makarova@oparina4.ru
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Department of Assistive Technologies in the Treatment of Infertility
Elena Anatolievna Kalinina
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: e_kalinina@oparina4.ru
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Assistive Technologies in the Treatment of Infertility
Julia Sergeevna Skibina
Research Production Enterprise "Nanostructured Glass Technology"; International Research Educational Center "Structure-Mediated Nanobiophotonics"
Email: director@nano-glass.ru
Candidate of Physics and Mathematics, Director
Anastasia A. Zanishevskaya
Research Production Enterprise "Nanostructured Glass Technology"; International Research Educational Center "Structure-Mediated Nanobiophotonics"
Email: zanishevskayaaa@nano-glass.ru
Senior Researcher, NPP Nanostructural Glass Technology LLC, Head of the Advanced
Natalia Olegovna Yanchuk
Research Production Enterprise "Nanostructured Glass Technology"; International Research Educational Center "Structure-Mediated Nanobiophotonics"
Email: info@nano-glass.ru
Candidate of medical sciences, head of the sensor technology department
Aleksey Yu. Gryaznov
Research Production Enterprise "Nanostructured Glass Technology"; International Research Educational Center "Structure-Mediated Nanobiophotonics"
Email: info@nano-glass.ru
Leading Researcher, NPP Nanostructural Glass Technology LLC, Head of the Decision System Department of the Structural Nanobiophotonics Research Center.
References
- GBD 2017 Population and Fertility Collaborators. Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018; 392(10159): 1995-2051. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32278-5.
- Mascarenhas M.N., Flaxman S.R., Boerma T., Vanderpoel S., Stevens G.A. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(12): e1001356. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356.
- Turchi P. Prevalence, definition, and classification of infertility. In: Cavallini G., Beretta G. Clinical management of male infertility. Springer; 2015: 5-11.
- Wang J., Sauer M.V. In vitro fertilization (IVF): a review of 3 decades of clinical innovation and technological advancement. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2006; 2(4): 355-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.2006.2.4.355.
- Gardner D.K., Sakkas D. Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer - a review. Placenta. 2003; 24(Suppl. B): S5-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0143-4004(03)00136-x.
- Baxter A., Mayer J., Shipley S., Catherino W. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil. Steril. 2006; 86(6): 1608-15. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037.
- Storr A., Venetis C. A., Cooke S., Kilani S., Ledger W. Inter-observer and intraobserver agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study. Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32(2): 307-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew330.
- Curchoe C.L., Bormann C.L. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for human reproduction and embryology presented at ASRM and ESHRE 2018. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019; 36(4): 591-600. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10815-019-01408-x.
- Kononenko I. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif. Intell. Med. 2001; 23(1): 89-109.
- Kaufmann J., Eastaugh J., Snowden S., Smye S., Sharma V. The application of neural networks in predicting the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 1997; 12(7): 1454-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.7.1454.
- Badura A., Marzec-Wroblewska U., Kaminski P., Lakota P., Ludwikowski G., Szymanski M., Karolina Wasilow K. Prediction of semen quality using artificial neural network. J. Appl. Biomed. 2019; 17(3): 167-74. https://dx.doi. org/10.32725/jab.2019.015.
- Ma J., Zhen A., Guan S., Liu C., Huang X. Predicting seminal quality using back-propagation neural networks with optimal feature subsets.In: International conference on brain inspired cognitive systems. Springer; 2018: 25-33.
- Gil D., Girela J.L., De Juan J., Gomez-Torres M.J., Johnsson M. Predicting seminal quality with artificial intelligence methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012; 39(16): 12564-73.
- Helwan A., Khashman A., Olaniyi E.O., Oyedotun O.K., Oyedotun O.A. Seminal quality evaluation with RBF neural network Bull. Transilvania Univ. Brasov. Mathematics, Informatics, Physics. Series III. 2016; 9(2): 137.
- Wald M., Sparks A., Sandlow J., Van-Voorhis B., Syrop C.H., Niederberger C.S. Computational models for prediction of IVF/ICSI outcomes with surgically retrieved spermatozoa. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2005; 11(3): 325-31. https:// dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60840-1.
- Mostaar A., Sattari M., Hosseini S., Deevband M.R. Use of artificial neural networks and PCA to predict results of infertility treatment in the ICSI method. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 2019; 9(6): 679-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe. v0i0.1187.
- Linneberg C., Salamon P., Svarer C., Hansen L.K., Meyrowitsch J. Towards semen quality assessment using neural networks In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing. 1994: 509-17.
- Mirsky S., Barnea I., Levi M., Greenspan H., Shaked N.T. Automated analysis of individual sperm cells using stain-free interferometric phase microscopy and machine learning. Cytometry A. 2017; 91(9): 893-900. https://dx.doi. org/10.1002/cyto.a.23189.
- Alegre E., Biehl M., Petkov N., Sanchez L. Automatic classification of the acrosome status of boar spermatozoa using digital image processing and LVQ. Comput. Biol. Med. 2008; 38(4): 461-8.
- Bijar A., Benavent A.P., Mikaeili M., Khayati R. Fully automatic identification and discrimination of sperm’s parts in microscopic images of stained human semen smear. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2012; 5(7): 384-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ jbise.2012.57049.
- Tsai V., Zhuang B. MP46-10 An at-home system that adapts to different types of mobile phones for measuring sperm motility - verification of its performance of artificial intelligence (AI) sperm image recognition with cloud computing. J. Urol. 2019; 201(Suppl. 4). https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. JU.0000556302.57109.2b.
- Manna C., Nanni L., Lumini A., Pappalardo S. Artificial intelligence techniques for embryo and oocyte classification. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2013; 26(1): 42-9.
- Rocha J., Passalia F., Matos F. et al. A method based on artificial intelligence to fully automatize the evaluation of bovine blastocyst images. Scientific Rep. 2017; 7(1): 1-10.
- VerMilyea M., Hall J.M.M., Diakiw S.M., Johnston A., Nguyen T., Perugini D. et al. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. Hum. Reprod. 2020; 35(4): 770-84. https://dx.doi. org/10.1093/humrep/deaa013.
- Kanakasabapathy M., Thirumalaraju P., Bormann C., Kandula H. et al. Development and evaluation of inexpensive automated deep learning-based imaging systems for embryology. Lab. Chip. 2019; 19(24): 4139-45.
- Miyagi Y., Habara T., Hirata R. et al. Feasibility of artificial intelligence for predicting live birth without aneuploidy from a blastocyst image. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2019; 18(2): 204-11.
- Wong C., Loewke K.E., Bossert N., Behr B., De Jonge C.J., Baer T.M., Reijo Pera R.A. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010; 28(10): 1115.
- Conaghan J., Chen A., Willman S., Ivani K., Chenette P.E., Boostanfar R. et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 100(2): 412-9.