SURGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF ENDOMETRIOSIS REVISITED


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective: To propose new approaches to the classification of the disease based on the analysis of 2352 operations of patients with endometriosis performed in the department over 10 years. Materials and methods: A total of 12125 operations were performed in the surgical department. Surgeries for endometriosis accounted for 19.4% of them (2352/12 125). In 81.9% of cases, endometriosis was the main indication for surgical treatment. The mean age of the patients was 34.1±6.03 years. There were the following forms of the disease: ovarian endometriosis in 13.9% of cases, superficial endometriosis in 49.4% of cases, deep endometriosis with the lesion of the underlying layers of the peritoneum (muscular, submucosal, subperitoneal) in 58.3% of cases, nodular adenomyosis (the size of adenomyotic nodule exceeding 2 cm) in 3.6% of cases. Results: We proposed a new approach to the classification of endometriosis based on the depth of the lesion and type of surgical technology. The patients with stage 1 (superficial endometrioid heterotopias with a lesion depth not exceeding one layer) amounted to 25.7%; the rate of patients with stage 2 (endometriosis with the lesion of two layers (peritoneum, muscle/abdominal layers of any anatomical structure)) was 43.3%; stage 3 (endometriosis with the lesion of all layers of any anatomical structure, but without organ dysfunction) was noted in 17.2% of cases; stage 4 (endometriosis with the lesion of all layers of any anatomical structure and organ dysfunction) was detected in 7.1% of patients. Different methods of surgical treatment of endometriosis were applied, depending on the depth of the lesion: coagulation was used in 95% of patients with stage 1 lesion, excision was used only in 5% of cases with peritoneal confluent lesion. The main method of surgical treatment of patients with stage 2 was excision (100%) followed by suturing or coagulation. The clinical picture of the disease was determined not by the number of foci but by the depth of the lesion since the neurovascular unit was involved. The main method of removal of foci in patients with stage 3 (endometriosis of all layers of the organ but without impairment of its function) was excision/resection, and the method of restoring the integrity of the organ/tissue was suturing/anastomosis. In case of damage to all layers and organ dysfunction (stricture, angulation, damage to neighboring organs), the extent of surgical treatment was expanded to resection in 95% and removal of the organ in 5% of cases. Conclusion: This classification of endometriosis is relevant as the severity of endometriosis is assessed not due to the extension of the lesion but according to its depth. The use of this classification may help to identify the severity of the course of the disease most accurately and to predict further treatment tactics and rehabilitation which can improve reproductive outcomes and quality of life.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir D. CHUPRYNIN

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_chuprynin@oparina4.ru
PhD, Head of the Surgery Department Moscow, Russia

Tatyana Yu. SMOLNOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: smoltat@list.ru
Dr. Med. Sci., Senior Reseacher at the Surgery Department Moscow, Russia

Mikhail V. MELNIKOV

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m_melnikov@oparina4.ru
PhD, Head in Clinical Work, Surgery Department Moscow, Russia

Natalia A. BURALKINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: n_buralkina@oparina4.ru
Dr. Med. Sci., Senior Researcher at the Surgical Department Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Эндометриоз: диагностика, лечение и реабилитация. Клинические рекомендации. М.; 2013. 86c.
  2. Айламазян Э.К., Ярмолинская М.И., Молотков А. С., Цицкарава Д.З. Классификации эндометриоза. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2017; 66(2): 77-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.17816/JOWD66277-92.
  3. Saridogan E., Becker C.M., Feki A., Grimbizis G.F., Hummelshoj L., Keckstein J. et al.; Working group of ESGE, ESHRE and WES. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 1: Ovarian endometrioma. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2017; 2017(4): hox016. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox016.
  4. Keckstein J., Becker C.M., Canis M., Feki A., Grimbizis G.F., Hummelshoj L. et al.; Working Group of ESGE, ESHRE, and WES. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2020; 2020(1): hoaa002. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa002.
  5. Beecham C.T. Classification of endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1966; 28(3): 437.
  6. Acosta A.A., Buttram V.C. Jr, Besch P.K., Malinak L.R., Franklin R.R., Vanderheyden J.D. A proposed classification of pelvic endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1973; 42(1): 19-25.
  7. The American Fertility Society. Classification of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril.1979; 32(6): 633-4.
  8. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. Fertil. Steril. 1985; 43(3): 351-2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48430-x.
  9. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil. Steril. 1997; 67(5): 817-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81391-x.
  10. Koninckx P.R., Meuleman C., Demeyere S., Lesaffre E., Cornillie F.J. Sugges tive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is as sociated with pelvic pain. Fertil. Steril. 1991; 55(4): 759-65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54244-7.
  11. Адамян Л.В., Кулаков В.И. Эндометриозы. М.: Медицина; 1998.
  12. Горпенко А.А., Чупрынин В.Д., Асатурова А.В., Смольнова Т.Ю., Буралкина Н.А. Опыт органосохраняющего оперативного лечения женщин с диффузной формой аденомиоза III-IV стадии. Consilium Medicum. 2021; 23(7): 552-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2021.7.201076.
  13. Ищенко А.И., Кудрина Е.А. Эндометриоз: диагностика и лечение. М.: ГЭОТАР-МЕД; 2002. 104 с.
  14. Tuttlies F., Keckstein J., Ulrich U., Possover M., Schweppe K.W., Wustlich M. et al. ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl. Gynakol. 2005; 127: 275-81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-836904.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies