Postcovid syndrome in pregnant women

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of postcovid syndrome (PCS) in pregnant women who have not concomitant comorbid pathology.

Materials and methods: To assess the independent impact of the novel coronavirus infection on the development of PCS, the investigation involved women who had no known risk factors: those who are younger than 35 years, are without overweight/obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, and other somatic and chronic infectious diseases, who experienced COVID-19 in July to October 2021.

A study group consisted of patients without uncomplicated pregnancy (n=111); a comparison group included non-pregnant women (n=181). SARS-CoV-2 was identified by a polymerase chain reaction assay in the nasopharyngeal material in all cases. The symptoms of PCS were considered to be the clinical manifestations that were absent before COVID-19 and appeared not earlier than 4 weeks from the onset of the disease and lasted at least 2 months, which could not be explained by alternative diagnoses. The statistical database had been formed on the basis of primary medical documentation and an interview of the patients according to a special questionaire with an assessment of the existing symptoms on a 10-score scale.

Results: The pregnant women were 2.0 and 6.6 times more likely to have been ill with moderate and severe COVID infection, respectively, as compared with non-pregnant women (χ2=16.42; p<0.001; OR=2.99 (95% CI, 1.68; 5.35); p<0.001), which caused the increased risk of their hospitalization (OR=3.59 (95% CI, 2.06; 6.25); p<0.001). The incidence of PCS had no differences and amounted to 93.7 and 97.2%, respectively (p>0.05). PCS in the pregnant women was more frequently manifested by the development of dyspnea (37.8% vs 26.5%) (χ2=4.13; p=0.043; OR=1.69 (95% CI, 1.02; 2.80); p<0.05); moreover, the severity of the symptom did not differ in the comparison groups. Coughing and frequent urination occurred with same frequency in the pregnant and non-pregnant women, but their intensity prevailed in the maternal group. The pregnant women were less likely to have hair loss (46.8% vs 60.8% (χ2=5.4; p=0.021) with the symptom severity in the groups. Headache occurred less frequently in the pregnant women (30.6% vs 43.1% (χ2=4.52; p=0.034) and was less intensive (3.0 (2.6; 5.2) vs 5.0 (5.0; 5.9) scores (p=0.047). Other PCS symptoms (fatigue/easy fatigability, myalgia, weight loss, chest pain, palpitation, memory impairment, sleep disorders, depression, etc.) were recorded with the same frequency and severity.

Conclusion: Our investigation has demonstrated the widespread prevalence of PCS in young initially somatically healthy pregnant and non-pregnant women. The obtained facts regarding the symptoms identified in the pregnant women can be partly explained by physiological gestational changes in the mother’s body. However, further large-scale and longer-term investigations are needed to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of the development of PCS and its possible consequences in pregnant women.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Tatiana E. Belokrinitskaya

Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: tanbell24@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5447-4223

Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Pediatrics and Faculty of Additional Professional Education

Russian Federation, Chita

Natalya I. Frolova

Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: taasyaa@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7433-6012

Dr. Med. Sci., Associate Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Pediatrics and Faculty of Additional Professional Education

Russian Federation, Chita

Viktor A. Mudrov

Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: mudrov_viktor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5961-5400

Dr. Med. Sci., Associate Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Pediatrics and Faculty of Additional Professional Education

Russian Federation, Chita

Kristina A. Kargina

Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: kristino4ka100@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8817-6072

Assistant at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Pediatrics and Faculty of Additional Professional Education

Russian Federation, Chita

Evgeniya A. Shametova

Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: solnce181190@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2205-2384

Assistant at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Pediatrics and Faculty of Additional Professional Education

Russian Federation, Chita

Maria A. Agarkova

Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: rinary_19@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-4924-1475

Clinical Resident at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Pediatrics and Faculty of Additional Professional Education

Russian Federation, Chita

Chimita Ts. Zhamiyanova

Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: chimita_tunka@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-5293-615X

Clinical Resident at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Pediatrics and Faculty of Additional Professional Education

Russian Federation, Chita

References

  1. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020 Dec 18. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188
  2. Адамян Л.В., Вечорко В.И., Конышева О.В., Харченко Э.И., Дорошенко Д.А. Постковидный синдром в акушерстве и репродуктивной медицине. Проблемы репродукции. 2021; 27(6): 30-40. [Adamyan L.V., Vechorko V.I., Konysheva O.V., Kharchenko E.I., Doroshenko D.A. Post-COVID-19 syndrome in obstetrics and reproductive medicine. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2021; 27(6): 30 40. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/repro20212706130.
  3. Воробьев П.А., ред. Рекомендации по ведению больных с коронавирусной инфекцией COVID-19 в острой фазе и при постковидном синдроме в амбулаторных условиях. Проблемы стандартизации в здравоохранении. 2021; 7-8: 3-96. [Vorobyev P.A., ed. Recommendations for the management of patients with COVID-19 coronavirus infection in the acute phase and with post-COSVID syndrome on an outpatient basis. Problems of Standardization in Healthcare. 2021; (7-8): 3-96. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.26347/ 1607-2502202107-08003-096.
  4. Baig A.M. Chronic COVID syndrome: need for an appropriate medical terminology for long-COVID and COVID long‐haulers. J. Med. Virol. 2021; 93(5): 2555-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26624.
  5. Sivan M., Taylor S. NICE guideline on long COVID. BMJ. 2020; 371: m4938. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4938.
  6. Pierce J.D., Shen Q., Cintron S.A., Hiebert J.B. Post-COVID-19 syndrome. Nurs. Res. 2022; 71(2): 164-74. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000565.
  7. Kamal M., Abo Omirah M., Hussein A., Saeed H. Assessment and characterisation of post-COVID-19 manifestations. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2020; 75: e13746. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13746.
  8. Kayaaslan B., Eser F., Kalem A.K., Kaya G., Kaplan B., Kacar D. et al. Post-COVID syndrome: a single-center questionnaire study on 1007 participants recovered from COVID-19. J. Med. Virol. 2021; 93(12): 6566-74. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27198.
  9. Greenhalgh T., Knight M., A'Court C., Buxton M., Husain L. Management of post-acute COVID-19 in primary care. BMJ. 2020; 370: m3026. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3026.
  10. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C., Palacios-Ceña D., Gómez-Mayordomo V., Cuadrado M.L., Florencio L.L. Defining post-COVID symptoms (postacute COVID, long COVID, persistent post-COVID): an integrative classification. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(5): 2621. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052621.
  11. A clinical case definition of post COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus 6 October 2021. 27р. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1
  12. Machado K., Ayuk P. Post-COVID-19 condition and pregnancy. Case Rep. Womens Health. 2023; 37: e00458. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00458.
  13. Ludvigsson J.F. Case report and systematic review suggest that children may experience similar long-term effects to adults after clinical COVID-19. Acta Paediatr. 2021; 110: 914-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15673.
  14. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Методические рекомендации «Организация оказания медицинской помощи беременным, роженицам, родильницам и новорожденным при новой коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19». Версия 5 (28.12.2021). 135с. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Methodological guidelines «Organization of medical care for pregnant women, women in labor, women in labor and newborns with a new coronavirus infection COVID-19». Version 5 (28.12.2021). 135р. (in Russian)]. Available at: https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/059/052/original/BMP_preg_5.pdf
  15. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Временные методические рекомендации «Профилактика, диагностика и лечение новой коронавирусной инфекции (COVID-19)». Версия 17 (14.12.2022). 260с. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Temporary methodological guidelines «Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19)». Version 17 (28.01.2023). 260p. (in Russian)]. Available at: https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/061/254/original/%D0%92%D0%9C%D0%A0_COVID-19_V17.pdf
  16. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication, 2011. Availadle at: https://www.icjme.org Accessed 25.02. 2023.
  17. Lang T.A., Altman D.G. Statistical analyses and methods in the published literature: The SAMPL guidelines. Medical Writing. 2016; 25(3): 31-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.18243/eon/2016.9.7.4.
  18. Zambrano L.D., Ellington S., Strid P., Galang R.R., Oduyebo T., Tong V.T. et al.; CDC COVID-19 Response Pregnancy and Infant Linked Outcomes Team. Update: characteristics of symptomatic women of reproductive age with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by pregnancy status – united states, January 22-October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(44): 1641-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6944e3.
  19. Белокриницкая Т.Е., Артымук Н.В., Филиппов О.С., Фролова Н.И. Клиническое течение, материнские и перинатальные исходы новой коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19 у беременных Сибири и Дальнего Востока. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 2: 48-54. [Belokrinitskaya T.E., Artymuk N.V., Filippov O.S., Frolova N.I. Clinical course, maternal and perinatal outcomes of a new coronavirus infection COVID-19 in pregnant women in Siberia and the Far East. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; (2): 48-54. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.2.48-54.
  20. Gulic T., Blagojevic Zagorac G. COVID-19 and pregnancy: are they friends or enemies? Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2021; 42(1): 57-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2020-0054.
  21. Jafari M., Pormohammad A., Sheikh Neshin S.A., Ghorbani S., Bose D., Alimohammadi S. et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 and comparison with control patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021; 31(5): 1-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2208.
  22. Белокриницкая Т.Е., Фролова Н.И., Колмакова К.А., Шаметова Е.А. Факторы риска и особенности течения COVID-19 у беременных: сравнительный анализ эпидемических вспышек 2020 и 2021г. Гинекология. 2021; 23(5): 421-7. [Belokrinitskaya T.E., Frolova N.I., Kolmakova K.A., Shametova E.A. Risk factors and features of COVID-19 course in pregnant women: a comparative analysis of epidemic outbreaks in 2020 and 2021. Gynecology. 2021; 23(5): 421-7. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.26442/ 20795696.2021.5.201107.
  23. Wang H., Li N., Sun C., Guo X., Su W., Song Q. et al. The association between pregnancy and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2022; 56: 188-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.060.
  24. Mihajlovic S., Nikolic D., Santric-Milicevic M., Milicic B., Rovcanin M., Acimovic A., Lackovic M. Four waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: comparison of clinical and pregnancy outcomes. Viruses. 2022; 14(12): 2648. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14122648.
  25. Vousden N., Ramakrishnan R., Bunch K., Morris E., Simpson N., Gale C. et al. Management and implications of severe COVID-19 in pregnancy in the UK: Data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System national cohort. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2022; 101(4): 461-70. https://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14329.
  26. Andeweg S.P., Vennema H., Veldhuijzen I., Smorenburg N., Schmitz D., Zwagemaker F.; SeqNeth Molecular surveillance group; RIVM COVID-19 Molecular epidemiology group. Elevated risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant compared to Alpha variant in vaccinated individuals. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022; 15(684): eabn4338. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abn4338.
  27. Sharif N., Alzahrani K.J., Ahmed S.N., Khan A., Banjer H.J., Alzahrani F.M. et al. Genomic surveillance, evolution and global transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during 2019–2022. PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0271074. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271074.
  28. Артымук Н.В., Белокриницкая Т.Е. Клинические нормы. Акушерство и гинекология. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2018. 352с. [Artymuk N.V., Belokrinitskaya T.E. Clinical norms. Obstetrics and gynecology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. 352p. (in Russian)].
  29. Shan D., Li S., Xu R., Nie G., Xie Y., Han J. et al. 2022; 14: 1077384. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1077384.
  30. ACOG. Your pregnancy and childbirth: month to month from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG; Seventh edition. January 26, 2021. 762p. Available at: https://www.acog.org/womens-health/your-pregnancy-and-childbirth
  31. Malfertheiner M., Malfertheiner P., Costa S.D., Pfeifer M., Ernst W., Seelbach-Göbel B., Malfertheiner F.S. Extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease during pregnancy. Z. Gastroenterol. 2015; 53(9): 1080-3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1399453.
  32. Рябова М.А., Шумилова Н.А., Лаврова О.В., Пестакова Л.В., Федотова Ю.С. Дифференциальная диагностика причин кашля у беременных. Вестник оториноларингологии. 2016; 81(4): 50-3. [Riabova M.A., Shumilova N.A., Lavrova O.V., Pestakova L.V., Fedotova Yu.S. Differential diagnostics of the causes responsible for a cough in the pregnant women. Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2016; 81(4): 50-3. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/otorino201681450-53.
  33. Miwa M., Nakajima M., Kaszynski R.H., Hamada S., Ando H., Nakano T. et al. Abnormal pulmonary function and imaging studies in critical COVID-19 survivors at 100 days after the onset of symptoms. Respir. Investig. 2021; 59(5): 614-21. https://dx.doi.org/1016/j.resinv.2021.05.005.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies