Application of NOSE technique for laparoscopic large bowel resection in patients with infiltrating endometriosis

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal endometriosis is used due to necessity for large bowel resection and application of сircular stapling anastomosis. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) is a technique that makes it possible to perform step-by step procedures for intestinal fragments extraction and installation of extraction device without using minilaparotomy. NOSE surgery is less painful and provides a cosmetic effect without worsening treatment results.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of NOSE technique for laparoscopic large bowel resection in patients with colorectal endometriosis.

Materials and methods: The study was carried out from 2023 to 2025 at the Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia. A total of 15 patients who underwent NOSE surgery, and 45 patients who underwent bowel resection using minilaparotomy were examined. The duration of surgery, blood loss, postoperative pain (according visual analog scale (VAS) scores), the length of hospital stay, and treatment outcomes were assessed.

Results: The duration of surgery, the length of hospital stay in the studied groups of patients were almost similar. Also, there were no differences in treatment outcomes. Pain intensity in the group of women who underwent NOSE surgery was significantly lower on the third day after surgery.

Conclusion: The use of NOSE technique for laparoscopic large bowel resection in patients with colorectal endometriosis makes it possible to achieve the effectiveness and safety comparable with conventional surgical approach. Moreover, there was reduction of postoperative pain and better cosmetic effect after surgery.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Dmitry Ovodenko

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: d_ovodenko@oparina4.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0700-8374

Dr. Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Innovative Oncology and Gynecology

Rússia, 4 Ac. Oparin str., Moscow, 117997

Fedor Cheknizov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: fedo7700@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0009-0005-1748-7630

2nd year clinical resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)

Rússia, 4 Ac. Oparin str., Moscow, 117997

Muslim Maltsagov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: terekman94@gmail.com

oncologist-gynecologist, Department of Innovative Oncology and Gynecology

Rússia, 4 Ac. Oparin str., Moscow, 117997

Vladimir Chuprynin

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_chuprynin@oparina4.ru
ORCID ID: 0009-0003-7856-2863

PhD, Head of the Surgical Department

Rússia, 4 Ac. Oparin str., Moscow, 117997

Bibliografia

  1. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Эндометриоз. 2020. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Endometriosis. 2020. (in Russian)].
  2. Parazzini F., Esposito G., Tozzi L., Noli S., Bianchi S. Epidemiology of endometriosis and its comorbidities. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017; 209: 3-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.021.
  3. Ota Y., Andou M., Ota I. Laparoscopic surgery with urinary tract reconstruction and bowel endometriosis resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Asian J. Endosc. Surg. 2018; 11(1): 7-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ases.12464.
  4. Yong P.J., Bedaiwy M.A., Alotaibi F., Anglesio M.S. Pathogenesis of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021; 71: 2-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.009.
  5. Roman H., Darwish B., Bridoux V., Chati R., Kermiche S., Coget J. et al. Functional outcomes after disc excision in deep endometriosis of the rectum using transanal staplers: a series of 111 consecutive patients. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 107(4): 977-986.e2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2016.12.030.
  6. Grigoriadis G., Daniilidis A., Merlot B., Stratakis K., Dennis T., Crestani A. et al. Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2024; 93: 102455. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102455.
  7. Malzoni M., Iuzzolino D., Rasile M., Coppola M., Casarella L., Di Giovanni A. et al. Surgical principles of segmental rectosigmoid resection and reanastomosis for deep infiltrating endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27(2): 258. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.06.018.
  8. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Adamyan L., Wattiez A., Donnez J. Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 98(3): 564-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061.
  9. Donnez O., Roman H. Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil. Steril. 2017; 108(6): 931-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2017.09.006.
  10. Wang X., ed. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery. Colorectal cancer. Springer; 2018. 195 p. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0466-8.
  11. Пучков Д.К., Хубезов Д.А., Игнатов И.С., Огорельцев А.Ю., Луканин Р.В., Евсюкова М.А., Ли Ю.Б., Кротков А.Р. Первый опыт выполнения лапароскопических операций с извлечением препарата через естественные отверстия (noses) при раке прямой кишки. Колопроктология. 2020; 19(2): 69-82. [Puchkov D.K., Khubezov D.A., Ignatov I.S., Ogoreltsev A.Y., Lukanin R.V., Evsiukova M.A., Li Y.B., Krotkov A.R. primary experience of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (noses) for rectal cancer. Koloproktologia. 2020; 19(2): 69-82. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.33878/ 2073-7556-2020-19-2-69-82.
  12. Tuttlies F., Keckstein J., Ulrich U., Possover M., Schweppe K.W., Wustlich M. et al. ENZIAN-Score, eine Klassifikation der tief infiltrierenden Endometriose [ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis]. Zentralbl. Gynakol. 2005; 127(5): 275-81. (in German). https:// dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-836904.
  13. He J., Hu J.F., Shao S.X., Yao H.B., Zhang X.F., Yang G.G. et al. The comparison of laparoscopic colorectal resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus mini-laparotomy specimen extraction for colorectal tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. J. Oncol. 2020; 2020: 6204264. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6204264.
  14. Liu R.J., Zhang C.D., Fan Y.C., Pei J.P., Zhang C., Dai D.Q. Safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic NOSE surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal diseases: a meta-analysis. Front. Oncol. 2019; 9: 597. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00597.
  15. He J., Yao H.B., Wang C.J., Yang Q.Y., Qiu J.M., Chen J.M. et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2020; 18(1): 215. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01982-w.
  16. Guan X., Liu Z., Longo A., Cai J.C., Tzu-Liang Chen W., Chen L.C. et al; International Alliance of NOSES. International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol. Rep. (Oxf.). 2019; 7(1): 24-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goy055.
  17. Попов А.А., Федоров А.А., Сопова Ю.И., Глебов Т.А., Трошина В.В., Головин А.А., Белоусов М.Д., Мамедова С.Г. Сравнение основных способов хирургического лечения больных с колоректальным эндометриозом. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2024; 24(6): 118-23. [Popov A.A., Fedorov A.A., Sopova Yu.I. et al. Comparison of the main methods of surgical treatment of patients with colorectal endometriosis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024; 24(6): 118-23. (in Russian)]. https:// dx.doi.org/10.17116/rosakush202424061118.
  18. Milone M., Angelini P., Berardi G., Burati M., Corcione F., Delrio P. et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer: results from a multi-institutional audit on 181 consecutive patients. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32(8): 3467-73. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6065-8.
  19. Swaid F., Sroka G., Madi H., Shteinberg D., Somri M., Matter I. Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted left colectomy for cancer: a retrospective review. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30(6): 2481-8. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4502-5.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Removal of the intestine through an extended access in the left iliac region

Baixar (779KB)
3. Fig. 2. Fixation of the anvil of the circular stapler in the proximal part of the intestine

Baixar (833KB)
4. Fig. 3. Intersection of the proximal edge of colon resection using the NOSE technique

Baixar (396KB)
5. Fig. 4. Intersection of the distal edge of colon resection using the NOSE technique

Baixar (572KB)
6. Fig. 5. Removal of the resected intestine specimen through the rectum

Baixar (367KB)
7. Fig. 6. Installation of the anvil of the circular stapler into the proximal part of the intestine

Baixar (610KB)
8. Fig. 7. Removing the tip of the anvil of the circular suturing device

Baixar (942KB)
9. Fig. 8. View of postoperative sutures after bowel resection using the NOSE method

Baixar (1MB)
10. Fig. 9. View of postoperative sutures after bowel resection using the traditional method

Baixar (1MB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2025