CLINICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE EFFICIENCY OF PREGRAVID TREATMENT WITH DUPHASTON IN WOMEN AFTER NON-DEVELOPING PREGNANCIES


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To test the efficiency of pregravid treatment with duphaston in women after non-developing pregnancies. Subject and methods. Seventy-eight women were examined in two steps. The first step was the postmortem diagnosis of luteal phase defect, a dominant endocrine cause, from uterine cavity scrapes. Then they were on pregravid treatment with 1 duphaston tablet twice on cycle days 16 to 25 for 3 months. The second step involved the concurrent use of a triad of tests: 1) control endometrial aspiration biopsy on cycle day 26; 2) ultrasonographic measurement of the thickness of the endometrium and the diameter of the corpus luteum; 3) determination of blood progesterone concentration. Results. Analysis of these complementary indicators could identify 46 (61.54%) women with the adequate endometrium corresponding to the late secretory phase. Retarded development of the endometrial glands and a weak predecidual reaction around the spiral arterioles were revealed in the remaining 32 (38.46%) women; in them, a course of pregravid treatment with duphaston was additionally prolonged up to 6 months and uterine physiotherapy sessions were carried out to stimulate the receptor apparatus of endometrial cells. Conclusion. The use of the above clinical and morphological triad of signs permitted recommendation with certainty that the married couples should plan their next pregnancy, as confirmed by 90% good outcomes.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. P MILOVANOV

Research Institute of Human Morphology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

Email: a_p_milovanov@mail.ru

O. P GERASIMOVA

OOO Diamed-Estate

References

  1. Сидельникова В.М. Привычная потеря беременности. М. Триада-Х. 2000. 303 с.
  2. Сидельникова В.М., Сухих Г.Т. Невынашивание беременности. М. ООО «МИА». 2010. 536 с.
  3. Милованов А.П., Серова О.Ф. Причины и дифференцированное лечение раннего невынашивания беременности. М. МДВ. 2011. 214 с.
  4. Илизарова Н.А. Привычное невынашивание беременности: патоморфологический анализ эндометрия, клинические особенности и обоснование стратегии терапии. Автореф. докт. дисс. Новосибирск. 2009. 47 с.
  5. Li T.C., Dockery P. et al. Histological dating of endometrium. Fertil. Steril. 1989. V 51. p. 759-764.
  6. Li T.C., Tuckerman E.M. Endometrial factors in recurrend miscarriage. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2002. V 8. № 1. р. 43-52.
  7. Jordan J., Craig K. et al. Luteal phase defect. Fertil. Steril. 1994. V62. p. 54-58.
  8. Герасимова О.П., Милованов А.П. Роль морфологического контроля эффективности прегравидарного лечения женщин с неразвивающейся беременностью. Сб. Научн. Трудов ГУ НИИ морфологии человека РАМН. М. 2008. с. 27-29.
  9. Герасимова О.П., Милованов А.П. Клиникоморфологический контроль эффективности прегравидарного лечения женщин с неразвивающейся беременностью. Вестн. РУДН.Медицина. 2009. № 7. с. 76-78.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2013 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies