Surgical stage of infertility treatment: effectiveness, appropriateness, place and timing


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Purpose of the study. To specify the role of surgical intervention for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 1364 women aged 19 - 40 years who underwent the stage of surgical diagnosis and treatment of infertility in the period from January, 2010 to December, 2016. Results. Surgical treatment of infertility facilitates the recovery of reproductive function, mainly at a young age with minimal changes in human pelvic morphology. In addition, the surgery can be considered as a preparatory stage in assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs. There is little possibility for surgical treatment of severe morphological changes in the reproductive organs. Conclusion. Despite the diminishing role of reproductive surgery as the main method of infertility treatment, it continues to be important in the recovery of the fertility and improvement of the effectiveness of ART.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V Vostrikov

Altai State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; Siberian Institute of Reproduction and Human Genetics

Email: wkoctar@mail.ru
Cand. Med. Sci.; Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Course of Advanced Professional Education 40, Lenin Prosp., Barnaul 656038, Altai Territory, Russian Federation

E. A Makarova

Altai State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: markelena2010@yandex.ru
Cand. Med. Sci.; Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Course of Advanced Professional Education 40, Lenin Prosp., Barnaul 656038, Altai Territory, Russian Federation

T. A Kuznetsova

Altai State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Cand. Med. Sci.; Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Course of Advanced Professional Education 40, Lenin Prosp., Barnaul 656038, Altai Territory, Russian Federation

T. V Zhuk

Altai State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; Siberian Institute of Reproduction and Human Genetics

Email: tamarazhuk13@mail.ru
Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Course of Advanced Professional Education 40, Lenin Prosp., Barnaul 656038, Altai Territory, Russian Federation

M. A Timchenko

Clinical hospital "RZhD-Medicine"

Email: timsch@yandex.ru
Head, Gynecology Unit 40, Lenin Prosp., Barnaul 656038, Altai Territory, Russian Federation

References

  1. Сухих Г.Т., Стеняева Н.Н. Репродукция и сексуальность. Акушерство и гинекология. 2014; 7: 4-9
  2. Crawford G.E., Ledger W.L. In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection beyond 2020. BJOG. 2019; 126(2): 237-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15526.
  3. Краснопольская К.В., Назаренко Т.А. Клинические аспекты лечения бесплодия в браке. Диагностические и терапевтические программы с использованием методов восстановления естественной фертильности и вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2013. 376с.
  4. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения РФ от 1 ноября 2012 г. № 572н. Порядок оказания медицинской помощи по профилю «акушерство и гинекология (за исключением использования вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий)», Приложение № 20. Доступно по: http:// base.garant.ru/70352632/
  5. Трухачёва Н.В. Математическая статистика в медико-биологических исследованиях с применением пакета Statistica. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2013. 384с
  6. Cohain J.S., Buxbaum R.E., Mankuta D. Spontaneous first trimester miscarriage rates per woman among parous women with 1 or more pregnancies of 24 weeks or more. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1): 437. https://dx.doi. org/10.1186/s12884-017-1620-1.
  7. Glatstein I.Z., Sleeper L.A., Lavy Y., Simon A., Adoni A., Paid Z. et al. Observer variability in the diagnosis and management of the hysterosalpingogram. Fertil. Steril. 1997; 67(2): 233-7.
  8. Fatum M., Laufer N., Simon A. Investigation of the infertile couple: should diagnostic laparoscopy be performed after normal hysterosalpingography in treating infertility suspected to be of unknown origin? Hum. Reprod. 2002; 17(1): 1-3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.1.1.
  9. Yu X., Cai H., Guan J., Zheng X., Han H. Laparoscopic surgery: Any role in patients with unexplained infertility and failed in vitro fertilization cycles? Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(13): e14957. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ MD.0000000000014957.
  10. Gomel V. The place of reconstructive tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive techniques. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2015; 31(6): 722-31. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.010.
  11. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Committee opinion: role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 97(3): 539-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fertnstert.2011.12.031.
  12. Llarena N.C., Falcone T., Flyckt R.L. Fertility рreservation in women with endometriosis. Clin. Med. Insights Reprod. Health. 2019 Sep. 3; 13: 1179558119873386. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179558119873386.
  13. Harris А., Tsaltas J. Endometriosis and infertility: A systematic review. J. Endometr. Pelvic Pain Disord. 2017; 9(3): 139-49. https://dx.doi.org/10.5301/ jeppd.5000296.
  14. Zanelotti A., Decherney A.H. Surgery and Endometriosis. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 60(3): 477-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000291.
  15. Lee H.J., Lee J.E., Ku S.Y., Kim S.H., Kim J.G., Moon S.Y., Choi Y.M. Natural conception rate following laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with endometriosis. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2013; 40(1): 29-32. https://dx.doi. org/10.5653/cerm.2013.40.1.29.
  16. Munne S., Held K.R., Magli C.M., Ata B., Wells D., Fragouli E. et al. Intraage, intercenter, and intercycle differences in chromosome abnormalities in oocytes. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 97(4): 935-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fertnstert.2012.01.106.
  17. Zepiridis L.I., Grimbizis G.F., Tarlatzis B.C. Infertility and uterine fibroids. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016; 34: 66-73. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.12.001.
  18. Carranza-Mamane B., Havelock J., Hemmings R. The management of uterine fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained. infertility. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2015; 37(3): 277-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1701-2163(15)30318-2.
  19. Goldberg J., Pereira L. Pregnancy outcomes following treatment for fibroids: uterine fibroid embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 18(4): 402-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. gco.0000233934.13684.cb.
  20. Bulletti C., DE Ziegler D., Levi Setti P, Cicinelli E., Polli V., Stefanetti M. Myomas, pregnancy outcome, and in vitro fertilization. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004; 1034: 84-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1335.010.
  21. Ojo-Carons M., Mumford S.L., Armstrong A.Y., DeCherney A.H., Devine K. Is myomectomy prior to assisted reproductive technology cost effective in women with intramural fibroids? Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2016; 81(5): 442-6. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1159/000443391.
  22. Perquin D.A.M., Dorr P.J., de Craen A.J.M., Helmerhorst F.M. Routine use of hysterosalpingography prior to laparoscopy in the fertility workup: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 2006; 21(5): 1127-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei478.
  23. Shimizu Y., Yamaguchi W., Takashima A., Kaku S., Kita N., Murakami T. Longterm cumulative pregnancy rate in women with unexplained infertility after laparoscopic surgery followed by in vitro fertilization or in vitro fertilization alone. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2011; 37(5): 412-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.nn/ j.1447-0756.2010.01369.x.
  24. Campo R., Meier R., Dhont N., Mestdagh G., Ombelet W. Implementation of hysteroscopy in an infertility clinic: The one-stop uterine diagnosis and treatment. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014; 6(4): 235-9.
  25. Di Spiezio Sardo A., Di Carlo C., Minozzi S., Spinelli M., Pistotti V., Alviggi C. et al. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update. 2016; 22(4): 479-96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/ dmw008.
  26. Pundir J., Pundir V., Omanwa K., Khalaf Y., El-Toukhy T. Hysteroscopy prior to the first IVF cycle: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2014; 28(2): 151-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.025.
  27. Makled A.K., Farghali M.M., Shenouda D.S. Role of hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in women with unexplained infertility. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014; 289(1): 187-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2931-8.
  28. Elsetohy K.A., Askalany A.H., Hassan M., Dawood Z. Routine office hysteroscopy prior to ICSI vs. ICSI alone in patients with normal transvaginal ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015; 291(1): 193-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3397-z.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2020 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies