Consulting gamete and embryo donors and surrogate mothers: problems and their solution ways in world practice
- Authors: Bashmakova N.V.1, Polyakova I.G.2, Symaniuk E.E.2, Khramtsova A.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
- Issue: No 11 (2021)
- Pages: 50-55
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/249357
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.11.50-55
- ID: 249357
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
About the authors
Nadezda V. Bashmakova
Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: bashmakovanv@nmomm.ru
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Superintendent in Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Ural Federal District, Director of the Center for Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Chief Researcher
Irina G. Polyakova
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsinresearcher, Ural Center for Advanced Studies
Elvira E. Symaniuk
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Email: e.e.symaniuk@urfu.ru
Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Professor, Head of the Department of Psychology
Aleksandra Yu. Khramtsova
Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: aleksaxr@mail.ru
obstetrician-gynecologist, Junior Researcher
References
- Hogan R.G., Wang A.Y., Li Z., Hammarberg K., Johnson L., Mol B.W., Sullivan E.A. Having a baby in your 40s with assisted reproductive technology: The reproductive dilemma of autologous versus donor oocytes. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020; 60(5): 797-803. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13179.
- Barri P.N., Coroleu B., Clua E., Tur R., Boada M., Rodriguez I. Investigations into implantation failure in oocyte-donation recipients. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2014; 28(1): 99-105. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.012.
- Visser М., Gerrits Т., Kop F, Van der Veen F., Mochtar M. Exploring parents’ feelings about counseling in donor sperm treatment. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 37(4): 156-63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1195806.
- Visser М., Gerrits Т., Van der Veen F., Mochtar M. Counsellors’ practices in donor sperm treatment. Hum. Fertil. 2019; 22(4): 255-65.https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2018.1449970.
- Machin L. A hierarchy of needs? Embryo donation, in vitro fertilisation and the provision of infertility counselling. Patient Educ. Couns. 2011; 85(2): 264-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.014.
- Mc Leod J. An introduction to counselling. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press; 2013.
- Blyth E., Thorn P., Wischmann T. CBRC and psychosocial counselling: assessing needs and developing an ethical framework for practice. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2011; 23(5): 642-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.009.
- Mahlstedt P.P., Greenfeld D.A. Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: the need for patient preparation. Fertil. Steril. 1989; 52(6): 908-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53150-1.
- Hammarberg K., Carmichael M., Tinney L., Mulder A. Gamete donors' and recipients' evaluation of donor counselling: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008; 48(6): 601-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00925.x.
- Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee. 2011. Available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/senate/legal_and_constitutional_affairs/completed_inquiries/2010-13
- Fertility Society of Australia Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee. Code of practice for assisted reproductive technology units. 2008. Available at: https://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/wp-content/uploads/ 20080924-rtac-cop-final.pdf
- Supreme Court of Canada. Reference re assisted human reproduction act, 2010 SCC 61. Available at: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/ item/7905/index.do:
- Braverman A.M. Mental health counseling in third-party reproduction in the United States: evaluation, psychoeducation, or ethical gatekeeping? Fertil. Steril. 2015; 104(3): 501-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.023.
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Guidelines for counselling in infertility: special interest group ‘Psychology and Counselling’. Grimberg, Belgium: ESHRE; 1999. Available at: https://www.eshre.eu/Specialty-groups/Special-Interest-Groups/Psychology-Counselling/Archive/ Guidelines.aspx
- Jones H. W. Jr., Cooke I., Kempers R., Brinsden P., Saunders D. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95(2): 491. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.011.
- Blyth E. Guidelines for infertility counselling in different countries: is there an emerging trend? Hum. Reprod. 2012; 27(7): 2046-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des112.
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Code of ractice. 8th ed. 2009. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2062/2017-10-02-code-of-practice-8th-edition-full-version-11th-revision-final-clean.pdf
- Shenfield F., Pennings G., De Mouzon J., Ferraretti A.P., Goossens V. ESHRE Task Force 'Cross Border Reproductive Care' (CBRC). ESHRE's good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26(7): 1625-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der090.
- Cousineau T.M., Domar A.D. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007; 21(2): 293-308. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.003.
- Pennings G., de Wert G., Shenfield F., Cohen J., Tarlatzis B., Devroey P. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 13: the welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22(10): 2585-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem237.
- Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 100(1): 45-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.028.
- Visser M., Mochtar M.H., de Melker A.A., van der Veen F., Repping S., Gerrits T. Psychosocial counselling of identifiable sperm donors. Hum. Reprod. 2016; 31(5): 1066-74. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew037.
- Schover L.R., Collins R.L., Quigley M.M., Blankstein J., Kanoti G. Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors. Hum. Reprod. 1991; 6(10): 1487-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137295.
- Schenker J.G. Ovum donation: ethical and legal aspects. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1992; 9(5): 411-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01204043.
- Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ACART). Guidelines on embryo donation for reproductive purposes. 2008. Available at: https://www.acart.health.govt.nz/publications-and-resources/ guidelines-and-advice-issued-ecart/guidelines-embryo-donation
- Pennings G., de Wert G., Shenfield F., Cohen J., Tarlatzis B., Devroey P. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 12: oocyte donation for non-reproductive purposes. Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22(5): 1210-3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem025.
- Tulay P., Atilan O. Oocyte donors’ awareness on donation procedure and risks: A call for developing guidelines for health tourism in oocyte donation programmes. J. Turk. Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2019; 20(4): 236-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0110.
- Pande A. “It May Be Her Eggs But It’s My Blood”: Surrogates and everyday forms of kinship in India. Qual. Sociol. 2009; 32(4): 379-97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11133-009-9138-0.
- Goedeke S., Daniels K., Thorpe M. Embryo donation and counselling for the welfare of donors, recipients, their families and children. Hum. Reprod. 2016; 31(2): 412-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev304.
- de Lacey S. Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20(6): 1661-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh831.
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine 58th Annual Meeting. October 12-17, 2002. Seattle, Washington, USA. Abstracts. Fertil. Steril. 2002; 78(3, Suppl. 1): S1-324.
- McMahon C.A., Gibson F.L., Leslie G.I., Saunders D.M., Porter K.A., Tennant C.C. Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors. Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18(4): 871-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg167.
- Newton C.R., McDermid A, Tekpetey F., Tummon I.S. Embryo donation: attitudes toward donation procedures and factors predicting willingness to donate. Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18(4): 878-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg169.
- Edelmann R.J. Surrogacy: the psychological issues. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 2004; 22(2): 123-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0264683042000205981.
- Appleton T.C. Surrogacy. In: Boivin J.C., Kentenich H. eds. ESHRE monographs: Guidelines to counseling in infertility. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002: 37-8.
- Tehran H.A., Tashi S., Mehran N., Eskandari N., Tehrani T.D. Emotional experiences in surrogate mothers: A qualitative study. Iran. J. Reprod. Med. 2014; 12(7): 471-80.
- Taebi M., Alavi N.M., Ahmadi S.M. The experiences of surrogate mothers: A qualitative study. Nurs. Midwifery Stud. 2020; 9(1): 51-9: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_19_19.
- van den Akker O.B. Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2007; 13(1): 53-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml039.
- Australian and New Zealand Infertility Counsellors Association. Guidelines for professional standards of practice in infertility counselling. 2003. Available at: https://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/wp-content/uploads/ 2018-ANZICA-Guidelmes-for-Professional-Standards-1.pdf
- Hammarberg K., Johnson L., Bourne K., Fisher J., Kirkman M. Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response. Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29(2): 286-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det434.
- Pennings G., de Wert G., Shenfield F., Cohen J., Tarlatzis B., Devroey P. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care. Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23(10): 2182-4. 10.1093/humrep/ den184.