ISSUES IN THE CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF BOWEL ENDOMETRIOSIS


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Objective. To evaluate the clinical symptoms of bowel endometriosis and to identify a group at risk for this disease. Subject and methods. Complaints, medical history, and clinical features were analyzed in 93 patients with the verified diagnosis of bowel endometriosis. Results. The clinical forms of bowel endometriosis were identif ied as follows: 1. An aggressive form. This was typical for young women aged 18 to 25 years who had not been treated for endometriosis. In this group, the disease manifested with obvious «intestinal» symptoms (cyclic rectal bleeding, impaired passage of the intestinal contents). 2. A subtle form. This was typical for patients aged 25 to 34 years with meager clinical manifestations, in whom the clinical symptoms of bowel endometriosis were found only during an accentuated survey. This patient group showed a preponderance of complaints of infertility. Patients who had complaints associated with bowel dysfunction were not of particular concern due to their minor impact on quality of life. 3. A stenotic form. This was typical for patients aged 35 to 45 years with a long disease history who had previously received combination (medical and surgical) treatment for endometriosis. The effect of treatment was transient in all the patients. The patients commonly complained of chronic constipation, had to be on a strict diet and to constantly take laxatives, and had a complete lack of defecation and flatus during menstruation. Conclusion. The bowel endometriosis risk group comprises young patients with characteristic clinical symptoms and women with a long disease history who had been previously reoperated on for endometriosis and received ineffective medical treatment. In these patients, a directed search for bowel endometriosis should be carried out using a set of current examination techniques: ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, colonoscopy, and biopsy.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

M. MELNIKOV

V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Email: m_melnikov@oparina4.ru
Moscow

V. CHUPRYNIN

V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Email: v_chuprynin@oparina4.ru
Moscow

S. ASKOLSKAYA

V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Email: s_askolskaya@oparina4.ru
Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Адамян Л.В., Сонова М.М., Логинова О.Н., Яроцкая Е.Л., Арсланян К.Н. Оптимизация лечения наружного генитального эндометриоза с использованием антиоксидантных средств. В кн.: Тезисы докладов VI Международного конгресса по репродуктивной медицине. М.; 2012: 147.
  2. Айламазян Э.К., Цвелев Ю.В., Беженарь В.Ф. Российская гинекологическая школа в разработке проблемы эндометриоза. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2002; 51(3): 10-5.
  3. Баскаков В.П., Цвелев Ю.В., Кира Е.Ф. Эндометриоидная болезнь. СПб.: «Издательство Н-JI»; 2002. 452 с.
  4. Демидов В.Н., Зыкин Б.И. Ультразвуковая диагностика в гинекологии. М.: Медицина; 1990. 224 с.
  5. Краснопольский В.И., Буянова С.Н. Хирургическое лечение гинекологических заболеваний с поражением смежных органов. Вестник Российской ассоциации акушеров-гинекологов. 1994; 1: 70-6.
  6. Краснопольский В.И., Ищенко А.И. Врачебная тактика при распространенных формах генитального эндометриоза. Акушерство и гинекология. 1997; 5: 16-8.
  7. Ищенко А.И. Патогенез, клиника и оперативное лечение распространенных форм генитального эндометриоза: Автореф. дис.. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 1993. 44 с.
  8. Ищенко А.И., Кудрина Е.А., Бабурина И.П., Зуев В.М., Джибладзе Т.А. Эндоскопическое хирургическое лечение различных форм эндометриоза. Акушерство и гинекология. 1996; 5: 5-8.
  9. Chapron C., Fauconnier A., Goffinet F., Breart G., Dubuisson J.B. Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynecologic pathology: results of a meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 2002; 17: 1334-42.
  10. Краснопольский В.И., Ищенко А.И., Кудрина Е.А., Гадаева И.В., Бабурина И.П. Принципы хирургического лечения распространенных форм генитального эндометриоза с поражением соседних органов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2000; 3: 31-5.
  11. Remorgida V., Ferrero S., Fulcheri E., Ragni N., Martin D.C. Bowel endometriosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2007; 62(7): 461-70.
  12. Darai E., Ackerman G., Bazot M., Rouzier R., Dubernard G. Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis: limits and complications. Surg. Endosc. 2007; 21: 1572-7.
  13. Milburn A., Reiter R.C., Rhomberg A.T. Multidisciplinary approach to chronic pelvic pain. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 1993; 20: 643-61.
  14. Darai E., Thomassin I., Barranger E., Detchev R., Cortez A., Houry S., Bazot M. Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 192(2): 394-400.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bionika Media, 2013

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>