Electrosurgical ablation of the endometrium in saline medium in postmenopausal women


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Objective. To improve high-frequency hysteroresectoscopic electrosurgical (300 kHz) coagulant ablation of the endometrium, by comparatively assessing the use of monopolar ablation in dielectric medium and that of bipolar technology in saline solution. Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 100 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 71 years with uterine bleeding who had repeatedly undergone separately diagnostic dilatation and curettage. Endometrial pathology in the presence of atrophy was a criterion for inclusion into study groups. All the patients underwent laboratory, clinical, and gynecological examinations using a package of special diagnostic measures (ultrasonography, diagnostic hysteroscopy, and separately diagnostic dilatation and curettage and then a morphological examination of the removed material). They were subdivided into 2 groups according to monopolar or bipolar electrosurgical endometrial destruction. With monopolar technology, 5% glucose solution was used as an expansion medium (Group 1, n=50). Bipolar technology and 0.9% NaCl as an expansion medium were employed in Group 2 (n=50). Out of them, 8% had a cardiac pacemaker and 8% had metallic prostheses in the small pelvis. The endometrium was ablated using a 26Fr rigid two-way (continuous-flow) hysteroresectoscope (Olympus, Japan) with changeable mono- and bipolar passive working elements and roll electrodes in a coagulation mode. Surgery was performed under intravenous anesthesia with diprivan orfentanyl. The investigators intraoperatively estimated the levels of potassium, sodium, chlorine, intravasation, blood loss, and gas formation and the duration of intervention. All the patients received 5-day antibiotic therapy. They underwent small pelvic ultrasonography on days 1 and 5 postsurgery. Results. Both study groups showed no differences in the level of intravasation. Comparison of the levels the blood electrolytes potassium, sodium, and chlorine revealed that their values were in the normal range and the difference in their pre- and postoperative values was statistically insignificant. Conclusion. Monopolar (in 5% glucose) and bipolar (in saline solution - 0.9% NaCl) endometrial ablations were comparatively analyzed in postmenopausal women. Unlike the monopolar technology, the bipolar technology required the high output of an electricity generator and endometrial destruction was accompanied by high gas formation within the uterine cavity.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Satenik Gyurdzhyan

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: medikjan@yandex.ru
graduate student offices innovative minimally invasive techniques in gynecology

Sergey Sarkisov

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: 734i497@mail.ru
PhD, professor, head of the Innovative Department of minimally invasive technologies in gynecology

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Брусенко В.Г., Капушева Л.М., Мишева О.И., Иванова Н.В. Опыт применения гистероскопии в практике гинекологического стационара. Вестник Российской ассоциации акушеров-гинекологов. 1995; 3: 54-8. [Brusenko V.G., Kapusheva L.M., Misheva O.I., Ivanova N.V Experience of hysteroscopy in the gynecological hospital practice. Vestnik Rossiyskoy assotsiatsii akusherov-ginekologov. 1995; 3: 54-8. (in Russian)
  2. Саркисов С.Э. Эндохирургия матки: дисс.. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 1999. 215с. [Sarkisov S.E. Endosurgery cancer. Diss. Moscow; 1999. 215p. (in Russian)
  3. Rubin I.C. Uterine endoscopy, endometroscopy with the aid of uterine insu-flation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1925; 10: 313.
  4. Адамян Л.В., Белоглазова С.Е. Роль гистероскопии и гистерорезектос-копии в диагностике и лечении гинекологических заболеваний. В кн.: Кулаков В.И., Адамян Л.В., ред. Эндоскопия в диагностике и лечении патологии матки. Материалы Международного конгресса с курсом эндоскопии. М.; 1997; т.1: 63-9.
  5. Савельева Г.М., Бреусенко В.Г., Каппушева Л.М. Гистероскопия. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 1999. 176с. [Saveleva G.M., Breusenko V.G., Kappusheva L.M. Hysteroscopy. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 1999. 176p. (in Russian)
  6. Данильченко В.Н. Биполярная электрохирургия в оперативной гинекологии: дисс.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2002. 80с. [Danilchenko V.N. Bipolar electrosurgery in operative gynecology. Diss. Moscow; 2002. 80p. (in Russian)
  7. Данильченко В.Н., Саркисов С.Э., Карамышев В.К., Азиева А.А. Биполярная электрохирургическая деструкция эндометрия. В кн.: Актуальные проблемы акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии. Материалы 3-го Российского научного форума. М.; 2001: 60. [Danilchenko V.N., Sarkisov S.E., Karamyishev V.K., Azieva A.A. The bipolar electrosurgical destruction of the endometrium. In: Actual problems of obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology. Proceedings of the 3rd Russian scientific forum. M.; 2001: 60. (in Russian)
  8. Taylor PJ., Gordon A.G. Practical hysteroscopy. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ.; 1993. 114p.
  9. Kung R.C., Vilos G.A., Thomas B., Penkin P., Zaltz A.P., Stabinsky S.A. New bipolar system for performing operative hysteroscopy in normal saline. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 1999; 6(3): 331-6.
  10. Miki M., Shiozawa H., Matsumoto T., Aizawa T. Transurethral resection in normal saline solution TURIS in advanced system, preventing a reflex of an obturator nerve. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2003; 94(7): 671-7.
  11. James F., Daniell M.D. Аблация эндометрия как альтернатива гистерэктомии. В кн.: Кулаков В.И., Адамян Л.В., ред. Эндоскопия в диагностике и лечении патологии матки. Материалы Международного конгресса с курсом эндоскопии. М.; 1997; т.1: 83-102. [James F. Daniell M.D. Endometrial ablation as an alternative gisterek-tomy. In the book.: Kulakov VI, Adamyan LV, ed. Endoscopy diagnosis and treatment of pathologies of the uterus. Proceedings of the International Congress with a course of endoscopy. Moscow; 1997; vol.1: 83-102. (in Russian)
  12. Molloy D., Taylor P.T. Gynaecological surgery after endometrial ablation. Med. J. Aust. 1994; 161(10): 604-6.
  13. Wattiez A., Khandwala S., Bruhat M.A. Electrosurgery in operative endoscopy. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1995. 274p.
  14. Issa M.M., Young M.R., Bullock A.R., Bouet R., Petros J.A. Dilutional hyponatremia of TURP syndrome: a historical event in the 21 st century. Urology. 2004; 64(2): 298-301.
  15. Mencaglia L., Hamou J.E. Manual of gynecological hysteroscopy: diagnosis and surgery. Tuttlingen: Endo-Press; 2000: 75-6.
  16. Botto H., Lebret T., Barre P., Orsoni J.L., Herve J.M., Lugagne P.M. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J. Endourol. 2001; 15(3): 313-6.
  17. Shiozawa H., Aizawa T., Ito T., Miki M. A new transurethral resection system: operating in saline environment precludes obturator nerve reflexes. J. Urol. 2002; 168(6): 2665-7.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bionika Media, 2015

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>